Tournament Feedback
#41
Posted 22 February 2013 - 03:46 PM
#43
Posted 22 February 2013 - 04:00 PM
#44
Posted 22 February 2013 - 04:03 PM
Bryan Ekman, on 22 February 2013 - 03:18 PM, said:
For this challenge the rules will reward quality and quantity about evenly. For future challenges we will offer different win conditions.
For the future, I think this format works pretty well, but rewards quantity too strongly.
I fully understand requiring a minimum number of matches to qualify, as you want to avoid Bob getting a half dozen spectacular wins then dropping out... But if you reward quantity and quality evenly, those who can't play a lot can't compete effectively.
I'd far, far rather see a minimum - say, 25 matches? And after that, have # of games only count as a tie breaker.
While I was doing ok thus far, this is the only day I can really play much - sadly, despite doing (what I consider) reasonably well, I'll fall off over the weekend simply because I can't put enough games in. If there were a specific number I needed to qualify, it would be easier to work that in, but as it stands? There's really not much point in continuing, which is sad.
#47
Posted 22 February 2013 - 04:37 PM
BrianMMXII, on 22 February 2013 - 03:36 PM, said:
I'd rather have a no-lifer tourney than a tourney in which people can pad scores in ten matches by sync dropping with a large number of other people.
It seems to me that there is no good way to do a random queue solo Tourney.
Edited by Hell Mel, 22 February 2013 - 04:40 PM.
#48
Posted 22 February 2013 - 04:39 PM
100 games for the weekend would have been a good cap.
#49
Posted 22 February 2013 - 04:52 PM
#50
Posted 22 February 2013 - 04:54 PM
#51
Posted 22 February 2013 - 04:56 PM
#52
Posted 22 February 2013 - 04:57 PM
I am thinking it is a bad sign if your in the top 25, south parks WoW episode keeps springing to mind.
Maybe this is PGI's version of dracul's free feast for the 'poor'
#53
Posted 22 February 2013 - 05:02 PM
#54
Posted 22 February 2013 - 05:02 PM
Abivard, on 22 February 2013 - 04:57 PM, said:
I am thinking it is a bad sign if your in the top 25, south parks WoW episode keeps springing to mind.
Maybe this is PGI's version of dracul's free feast for the 'poor'
Don't bother trying, I went from 2nd to 9th. It's been 20 minutes since I stopped lol.
#55
Posted 22 February 2013 - 05:11 PM
The only thing this weekend will confirm is they need to get integrated voice working, fix the 3L, and actually start tweaking ECM in a meaningful way. 2/3 Things in this list they don't seem at all interested in doing, and haven't made any headway on integrated voice since before they went to open beta. Not holding my breath.
#56
Posted 22 February 2013 - 05:17 PM
#57
Posted 22 February 2013 - 05:23 PM
#59
Posted 22 February 2013 - 05:40 PM
#60
Posted 22 February 2013 - 05:45 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users