Rewriting The Canon BT Universe
#141
Posted 12 June 2012 - 08:42 PM
Its like, "Ok everyone, we're going to colonize space! Now everyone from Japan has to colonize 1000 star systems in this direction, and everyone from China gets this part of the pie, and somehow we'll maintain these distinct cultural differences a thousand years later with the advent of faster-than-light travel being common place. Yeah thats right we're gonna walk around with katanas and pretend we're samurais in the 31st century!! Derp!"
#142
Posted 12 June 2012 - 08:52 PM
Jayboltz, on 12 June 2012 - 08:42 PM, said:
Its like, "Ok everyone, we're going to colonize space! Now everyone from Japan has to colonize 1000 star systems in this direction, and everyone from China gets this part of the pie, and somehow we'll maintain these distinct cultural differences a thousand years later with the advent of faster-than-light travel being common place. Yeah thats right we're gonna walk around with katanas and pretend we're samurais in the 31st century!! Derp!"
Hell yea we are gonna pretend we are samurais in the 31st Century!!!
#143
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:15 PM
Delete the jihad, Word of blake, and dark age.
No seriously that has been the stupidest thing to be added to battletech since well dare I say the phoenix project in which btw all the mechs are hideous garbage art-wise. The problem with everything from 3058 onward was simply that all the mech designs became more and more rediculous, and thus it was less about a joy of the game and more about wizkids grabbing for cash.
Edit for comments:
Jayboltz, on 12 June 2012 - 08:42 PM, said:
Its like, "Ok everyone, we're going to colonize space! Now everyone from Japan has to colonize 1000 star systems in this direction, and everyone from China gets this part of the pie, and somehow we'll maintain these distinct cultural differences a thousand years later with the advent of faster-than-light travel being common place. Yeah thats right we're gonna walk around with katanas and pretend we're samurais in the 31st century!! Derp!"
The boundaries are not so well defined, inf act they're more or less centralized territories but there are many noted incidences of people of varied decents living within primary areas of other ethinic decent the Azami in the DC come to mind, Rassulhage is another...before they broke off that is.
Edited by TKG, 12 June 2012 - 10:18 PM.
#144
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:19 PM
Jayboltz, on 12 June 2012 - 08:42 PM, said:
Its like, "Ok everyone, we're going to colonize space! Now everyone from Japan has to colonize 1000 star systems in this direction, and everyone from China gets this part of the pie, and somehow we'll maintain these distinct cultural differences a thousand years later with the advent of faster-than-light travel being common place. Yeah thats right we're gonna walk around with katanas and pretend we're samurais in the 31st century!! Derp!"
And this, kids, is why reading is fundamental.
You make valid points regarding the gross misinterpretation and flat-out oversimplification of the Battletech lore. But people want one-to-one analogies and one line soundbites so they don't have to read or actually think about anything. This kind of nonsense irks me to no end because people actual think that is how it works.
Sorry, Jayboltz, this wasn't directed at you but your post was convenient.
#146
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:35 PM
Either way, I see no reason for any present or imminent events to be changed.
#147
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:48 PM
Jayboltz, on 12 June 2012 - 08:42 PM, said:
ahm, you are a bit off here... Actually the houses and their territories are INFLUENCED by the former earth cultures, they are not what these nations and cultures are today... there are caucasian kuritas en masse, as well as coloured Liaos, Korean Steiners and what not... cultures evolved, and ppl take those cultures for identification... i can´t see what´s wrong with that
#148
Posted 13 June 2012 - 11:44 AM
Basically you're saying that they're not as culturally tied to earth cultures as I think, but comon dude. Using katanas...bushido code... countless references to Japanese culture throughout the lore. Sounds like an entire japanese space empire to me.
I'm not bashing the crap out of Battletech lore. And I don't have a vendetta against the DC. Don't get bent out of shape, I've always been a big fan of it. But I certainly wouldn't go so far as to treat Btech lore as gospel. What would be so wrong with just having a dynamic timeline. People are getting MAD when someone wants to re-write the clan invasion and such in a game. It doesn't have to be canon. I think that would be fun, not heresy.
Look at Starwars, it's one of the best Sci-fi stories of all time, but there's tons of great (and not so great) non-canon lore in it. If anything, the worst thing that happened to Starwars was the new canon that came with the new episodes. Some of it is really cringe-worthy.
#149
Posted 14 June 2012 - 05:41 PM
#150
Posted 15 June 2012 - 11:14 AM
blindprophet, on 12 June 2012 - 04:36 AM, said:
You could easily call them 'obscure'. None of them are particularly famous or popular outside of btech circles at all. Heck I've been into btech since the mid 90's as a kid and haven't heard of most of the titles you listed. Just because they've been around since I was 3 does not make them any less obscure to a lot of people. Heck I know plenty of people who love battletech and have no clue the novels even exist.
Theres probably a metric ton of people who've never played the table top game, and have only played the computer games some only having started with mech 4, who don't even know there are books about a game they know nothing about. And more and more people are going to join in on the universe at MWO as their first btech/mechwarrior game pushing the books into further obscurity.
People who've read all the books and know them all are going to become more and more of a minority than they already are, and the books are going to continue to fade into obscurity. This is the way of things. And considering all the plot armor, mary sues, favortism I have heard complaned about from different people I've gamed with over the past 20 years I don't see how thats not a good thing...
this ones kind of silly, no they are not obscure, while yes there are not a billion of us BT lovers out there I have never had a problem walking into Barnes and Nobles and finding plenty of BT books from the beginnng to the end, heck even Waldons usually has some of the older books, you just have to be the type of reader who goes to the Book store as often as the hobby shop, or just order them online you can get em easy peasy and rikki tik, so im wicked confused by this constant reference to obscure, heck they have free copies of everyone of em online, but im not sure if they are legal or not, bit fuzzy on internet laws.
#151
Posted 15 June 2012 - 11:33 AM
Team Leader, on 10 June 2012 - 07:27 PM, said:
I've been playing the tabletop since before the game was a decade old. I've read tons of the fiction, played nearly every iteration of the BT/MW games, and absolutely love the lore. I am definitely a "diehard" fan, and I'm EXTREMELY excited about the chance to be a part of a re-written future. A Clan invasion from a completely different axis, for example, would be awesome!
I know for a fact I'm not the only "diehard" or "old-school" BT/MW fan that thinks this way, either. For some of us the chance to re-write history (or, more appropriately, write the future) is one of the most exciting things about this game.
Edited by Samuel Graves, 15 June 2012 - 11:34 AM.
#152
Posted 17 June 2012 - 06:08 PM
#153
Posted 17 June 2012 - 10:09 PM
Sychodemus, on 12 June 2012 - 10:19 PM, said:
And this, kids, is why reading is fundamental.
You make valid points regarding the gross misinterpretation and flat-out oversimplification of the Battletech lore. But people want one-to-one analogies and one line soundbites so they don't have to read or actually think about anything. This kind of nonsense irks me to no end because people actual think that is how it works.
Sorry, Jayboltz, this wasn't directed at you but your post was convenient.
Yes, somehow Swedenese got left out in the "I'm going to think about this as simply as possible" rant.
If it were so obvious, I'm not sure we'd see the diversity of thoughtful responses and friendly disagreements here
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














