Last Post Wins!
#4181
Posted 18 August 2014 - 06:38 PM
#4182
Posted 19 August 2014 - 02:16 PM
RAAAAAAAAAAAAWWRR ******* LESS THAN 100 DAMAGE AGAIN? RAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWRRR
(I understand it's a fast brawler but lack of armor is really, really hard to get used to.)
Edited by StompingOnTanks, 19 August 2014 - 03:17 PM.
#4183
Posted 20 August 2014 - 08:49 AM
#4184
Posted 21 August 2014 - 05:37 AM
http://news.yahoo.co...-100148319.html
I really hope they took the appropriate post-treatment quarantine method (take him off the treatment when he looks ok, keep him in isolation for the incubation period, if he is still ok then release him). Then again, these guys wouldn't be doctors if they didn't think of that. I hope.
#4185
Posted 21 August 2014 - 08:15 AM
#4186
Posted 21 August 2014 - 09:41 AM
XphR, on 21 August 2014 - 08:15 AM, said:
Me. Also, Kent did have a blood transfusion with a boy who survived the (Z)EBOV. Which probably helped a lot.
Truly a miracle of God's creation. Tobacco and rodents can beat off a virus that has a >50% death rate. Who'd have thought?
Edited by DavidHurricane, 21 August 2014 - 09:42 AM.
#4188
Posted 21 August 2014 - 12:09 PM
XphR, on 21 August 2014 - 11:52 AM, said:
Actually, I thought when I read about it for the first time (when it was first administered). I thought it would work. I didn't think of anti-bodies, mice, viruses, atoms, or numbers. That is something beyond humans.
Edited by DavidHurricane, 21 August 2014 - 12:09 PM.
#4189
Posted 21 August 2014 - 12:27 PM
#4190
Posted 22 August 2014 - 04:28 AM
#4191
Posted 22 August 2014 - 04:51 AM
StompingOnTanks, on 22 August 2014 - 04:28 AM, said:
At the same time they could disintegrate any matter.
I have no clue as to why people want nano-bots to self replicate. All a micro/nano bot needs to do is track a cell/virus and kill it with a chemical that stops its ability to replicate. Be it cancer or HIVs, that is all you have to do. Keep it from making babies and it depopulates and dies.
#4192
Posted 22 August 2014 - 06:51 AM
DavidHurricane, on 22 August 2014 - 04:51 AM, said:
At the same time they could disintegrate any matter.
I have no clue as to why people want nano-bots to self replicate. All a micro/nano bot needs to do is track a cell/virus and kill it with a chemical that stops its ability to replicate. Be it cancer or HIVs, that is all you have to do. Keep it from making babies and it depopulates and dies.
Good point. They would make absolutely terrifying weapons, probably worse than nukes. No self replicating then!
#4193
Posted 22 August 2014 - 08:10 AM
#4194
Posted 22 August 2014 - 03:04 PM
To me a self-replicating fighting robot is the most stupid thing ever. The best thing about robot armies is how easily they can be controlled. If you have a robot army that can build more of itself and (God Forbid) it has enough capacity to think for itself then you have a potential recipe for a disaster on the global scale.
But maybe I've seen too many sci-fi movies.
Edited by StompingOnTanks, 22 August 2014 - 03:04 PM.
#4195
Posted 22 August 2014 - 03:08 PM
XphR, on 22 August 2014 - 08:10 AM, said:
Only if you let them. They can't develop AI unless we give them the ability to. And you can run maintenance by hand. Or, by a nano hand you can control. You can have a chamber to repair them in, where they are suspend and a human controls a nano hand (or micro hand) to fix them.
And if worst comes to worst, scrap the bot and re-make it.
StompingOnTanks, on 22 August 2014 - 03:04 PM, said:
To me a self-replicating fighting robot is the most stupid thing ever. The best thing about robot armies is how easily they can be controlled. If you have a robot army that can build more of itself and (God Forbid) it has enough capacity to think for itself then you have a potential recipe for a disaster on the global scale.
But maybe I've seen too many sci-fi movies.
You're correct. But they can't just develop AI unless you allow them to run a learning cycle and modify their own code. And even then, you still can't make AI. It is just impossible with "computers" (not with electronics, but with transistors).
Also, why is StompingOnTanks' name in italics at the bottom of the page?
Edited by DavidHurricane, 22 August 2014 - 03:08 PM.
#4197
Posted 22 August 2014 - 03:51 PM
#4198
Posted 22 August 2014 - 04:39 PM
#4199
Posted 22 August 2014 - 11:48 PM
#4200
Posted 24 August 2014 - 02:36 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users