Yet another minimum specs question
#1
Posted 16 June 2012 - 07:04 AM
OS Version: Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Home Premium
System RAM: 6134 MB
CPU Name: Intel® Core i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
CPU Speeds: 2668
Physical CPUs: 1
Virtual CPUs: 8
Video Card Description: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
VRAM: 512 MB
Primary Display Resolution: 1280x1024
Multi-Monitor Desktop Resolution: 1280x1024
Microphone: True
Language: English (United States)
Free Hard Drive Space: 399634 MB
Total Hard Drive Space: 938436 MB
#2
Posted 16 June 2012 - 07:12 AM
#3
Posted 16 June 2012 - 07:44 AM
Here is a Benchmark of the 4850 with the card highlighted in red against tonz of other cards.
http://www.videocard...=Radeon+HD+4850
Edited correct card in link.
Edited by NinjaCool, 17 June 2012 - 08:51 AM.
#4
Posted 16 June 2012 - 07:59 AM
This game will scale far below this. I'm pretty sure you'll probably be able to run it (albeit in ugly fashion) on Sandy Bridges Intel 3000s because all MMOs do that for two reasons. Big matches with lots of players (so you can turn everything down) and the need to support weak machines.
#5
Posted 16 June 2012 - 08:05 AM
Gen0, on 16 June 2012 - 07:59 AM, said:
This game will scale far below this. I'm pretty sure you'll probably be able to run it (albeit in ugly fashion) on Sandy Bridges Intel 3000s because all MMOs do that for two reasons. Big matches with lots of players (so you can turn everything down) and the need to support weak machines.
Yeah the more people you cut out from being able to play the less money you get in the long run. Which is why most MMOs are made the way they are
#6
Posted 16 June 2012 - 08:15 AM
#7
Posted 16 June 2012 - 09:44 AM

#8
Posted 16 June 2012 - 09:48 AM
#10
Posted 16 June 2012 - 10:01 AM
Capnflintlock, on 16 June 2012 - 07:04 AM, said:
OS Version: Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Home Premium
System RAM: 6134 MB
CPU Name: Intel® Core™ i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
CPU Speeds: 2668
Physical CPUs: 1
Virtual CPUs: 8
Video Card Description: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
VRAM: 512 MB
Primary Display Resolution: 1280x1024
Multi-Monitor Desktop Resolution: 1280x1024
Microphone: True
Language: English (United States)
Free Hard Drive Space: 399634 MB
Total Hard Drive Space: 938436 MB
You can run it, and I am sure you can run it at decent settings as well. I predict mid range settings, or maybe even a little higher if you are willing to sacrifice some resolution.
#11
Posted 16 June 2012 - 10:06 AM
#12
Posted 16 June 2012 - 10:09 AM
Yuba Frank, on 16 June 2012 - 10:06 AM, said:
I think you are correct, however, the i7 is a massive upgrade from the minimum required CPU. Im pretty sure the i7 alone could run this game with 2GB of ram and integrated graphics without a dedicated graphics card at minimum settings with low resolution. Maybe mid resolution.
How well it performs depends on how well MWO integrates multi-core support as well.
#13
Posted 16 June 2012 - 01:15 PM
NinjaCool, on 16 June 2012 - 07:44 AM, said:
Here is a Benchmark with the card highlighted in red against tonz of other cards.
http://www.videocard...eForce4+Ti+4800
Thanks a lot man. I've really been looking forward to this game, but I was worried when I saw my card. My computer has been able to run nearly any game I've wanted to play fairly decently, usually on medium graphics or higher. However, it looks like I'll have to save up for a new graphics card if I want to play Mechwarrior Online. Any idea which would be a good choice? I'm not very hardware or software savy, so I don't know which card would be good in the long run with the setup I have
Edited by Capnflintlock, 16 June 2012 - 01:19 PM.
#14
Posted 16 June 2012 - 01:26 PM
#15
Posted 16 June 2012 - 01:42 PM
shroomprince, on 16 June 2012 - 01:26 PM, said:
Would the ATI 7700 integrate well with the setup I currently have? I was reading up on it, and there's a lot of required specs to be able to run well with what its put into.
#16
Posted 16 June 2012 - 01:48 PM
#17
Posted 16 June 2012 - 01:55 PM
Oh and BTW, Aegic, you could have the $1000 Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition Sandy Bridge-E six-core CPU, and without a video card, your not going to be able to play MW:O with decent graphics settings and get good FPS. The only integrated graphics I would try to use is in AMD's new FM1 socket APUs, which is the HD6530 gpu chipset.
#18
Posted 16 June 2012 - 02:00 PM
NinjaCool, on 16 June 2012 - 07:44 AM, said:
Here is a Benchmark with the card highlighted in red against tonz of other cards.
http://www.videocard...eForce4+Ti+4800
Capnflintlock, on 16 June 2012 - 01:15 PM, said:
Thanks a lot man. I've really been looking forward to this game, but I was worried when I saw my card. My computer has been able to run nearly any game I've wanted to play fairly decently, usually on medium graphics or higher. However, it looks like I'll have to save up for a new graphics card if I want to play Mechwarrior Online. Any idea which would be a good choice? I'm not very hardware or software savy, so I don't know which card would be good in the long run with the setup I have
WHOAAAAA MAN. Ninjacool is mistaken on which video card you have. You have a AMD 4800 chipset, not a Nvidia TI4800. There is a huge difference between the two. The AMD 4800 chip is much much much more powerful than the ti4800.
#19
Posted 16 June 2012 - 02:00 PM
Yuba Frank, on 16 June 2012 - 10:06 AM, said:
Minimum was actually the 5600/5700 series...the older 4850 (The weakest card in the 4800 series), outperforms the 5670 and the 5750, while being only slightly outdone by the 5770...so any card in the 4800 series meets the minimum for this game, or exceeds it marginally.
#20
Posted 16 June 2012 - 02:03 PM
Squigles, on 16 June 2012 - 02:00 PM, said:
Minimum was actually the 5600/5700 series...the older 4850 (The weakest card in the 4800 series), outperforms the 5670 and the 5750, while being only slightly outdone by the 5770...so any card in the 4800 series meets the minimum for this game, or exceeds it marginally.
That is really a matter of opinion. Besides, those 5000 series you mention are made for multimonitor support.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users














