Jump to content

No Roll Back On The Cerll?


13 replies to this topic

#1 Damien Tokala

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 788 posts

Posted 19 August 2014 - 10:34 AM

what is this? we were told it was only for the weekend.

#2 Bilbo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 7,864 posts
  • LocationSaline, Michigan

Posted 19 August 2014 - 10:38 AM

Who told you that?

Edited by Bilbo, 19 August 2014 - 10:38 AM.


#3 Bigbacon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3,088 posts

Posted 19 August 2014 - 10:38 AM

nope, we are stuck with the nerfs because the elite folks have spoken.....

#4 Damien Tokala

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 788 posts

Posted 19 August 2014 - 10:41 AM

said tweet HERE https://twitter.com/...601757569372161

#5 Bilbo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 7,864 posts
  • LocationSaline, Michigan

Posted 19 August 2014 - 10:50 AM

View PostDamien Tokala, on 19 August 2014 - 10:41 AM, said:


Not to pick nits, but that doesn't say the changes would only be in place for the weekend and I would refer you to this: http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__3624417

#6 Ren Kurogane

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Defiant
  • The Defiant
  • 175 posts
  • Location10.4.2 401

Posted 19 August 2014 - 11:02 AM

Well...the only thing they changed was -how many C-ERLL you can fire before ghost heat comes to haunt you- thing....about the C-ERLL duration...i just hope they won't test it on the training ground with dummies this time.

#7 Savage Wolf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Wolf
  • The Wolf
  • 1,323 posts
  • LocationÅrhus, Denmark

Posted 19 August 2014 - 11:03 AM

He was refering to the ghost heat limit of CERLLs which was rolled back last weekend which fits with the date of the tweet.

#8 nehebkau

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,386 posts
  • LocationIn a water-rights dispute with a Beaver

Posted 19 August 2014 - 11:05 AM

I really wish they would simply reduce the damage or range of the Cerll and get rid of the two seconds. From a DPS standpoint I want to run IS erLLs instead of Cerlls because of the duration.

#9 Daneiel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 490 posts
  • LocationSheridan

Posted 19 August 2014 - 12:08 PM

I see once again PGI ignore the feedback and continue to kill light and mediums mechs.

Edited by Daneiel, 19 August 2014 - 12:08 PM.


#10 Wraithlord77

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 59 posts
  • LocationIreland

Posted 19 August 2014 - 04:09 PM

Well i dont mind a bit extra heat (though it is still way to much at the moment) but that combined with the 2sec fireing time (that they said was a test as i recall) is a complete joke, any long range fit now is either Gauss +ERPPC or AC/UAC5+PPC which in a clan mech is close to impossable to fit right becouse of lack of free slots for DHS and ammo , you can have DHS's or ammo but not enough of both.

Im glad i only got the DWF and TWF a le carte , though i wish i haddn't even done that now, my DWF is just a 53kmh walking peice of junk nowand the my timber wolves are mid rage LRM spammers (and i hate spaming lrms) every time they come out with something you might actualy spend dosh on they go and cripple it becouse of lack of fore thought and proper testing.

#11 ShinobiHunter

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,009 posts
  • LocationPennsylvania

Posted 19 August 2014 - 07:02 PM

That plus all the whining on the forums. I know it's not the fix everyone was asking for, but it seemed to change the dynamics of the clanners.

#12 EvilCow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,233 posts

Posted 19 August 2014 - 10:29 PM

Bad ideas are never simply rolled back, never.

#13 DeathlyEyes

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Messenger
  • 940 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationMetaphorical Island somewhere in the Pacific

Posted 20 August 2014 - 05:20 AM

View PostEvilCow, on 19 August 2014 - 10:29 PM, said:

Bad ideas are never simply rolled back, never.

That would mean admitting total fault. It would also mean admitting whoever made the bad decisions is only making bad decisions.

Edited by DeathlyEyes, 20 August 2014 - 05:24 AM.


#14 nehebkau

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,386 posts
  • LocationIn a water-rights dispute with a Beaver

Posted 20 August 2014 - 06:32 AM

View PostDeathlyEyes, on 20 August 2014 - 05:20 AM, said:

That would mean admitting total fault. It would also mean admitting whoever made the bad decisions is only making bad decisions.


That is one of the fundamental, defining characteristics of a bad organization and/or bad leadership (refusal to admit errors) in an organization -- not saying this is the case with PGI -- but is one of the flags to watch out for when dealing with an individual or corporation.

Edited by nehebkau, 20 August 2014 - 06:33 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users