The Heavy Mech Debate
#1
Posted 02 September 2014 - 06:04 AM
#2
Posted 02 September 2014 - 06:19 AM
#3
Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:17 AM
Go Timberwolf any day!
The payload of the Summoner is just crap (a Stormcrow can do pretty much anything a Summoner can do too - except for the JJ's - while being a MEDIUM).
Despite that the Timberwolf is currently the most dangerous and useful Mech in the game.
It packs a serious punch, combined with decent armour and outrageous (!) speed + JJ's too.
#4
Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:31 AM
#6
Posted 02 September 2014 - 10:50 AM
That doesn't mean the Summoner isn't fun though. It's just never going to be as powerful as the Timber.
#7
Posted 03 September 2014 - 08:29 AM
I think if PGI were to introduce leg omnipods for the Summoner that lacked the jump jets of the current variants it would transform it from a maneuverable 70 ton mech to a less maneuverable but potent heavy hitter. It would give the Summoner one CT jump jet but free up four more tons for weapons and allow heat sinks or ammunition to be put into the legs.
#8
Posted 03 September 2014 - 08:37 AM
TopshotTiger, on 02 September 2014 - 06:04 AM, said:
The timberwolf does everything the summoner can do, but better (except jumping)
Now, as you know, jump jetting was severely nerfed. Thus, the 5JJ in the summoner now means less than ever before.
Furthermore, a good loadout with the summoner was the dual ppc/ac5 combo, but, PPCs now have been nerfed aswell and there's no logical reason to take them over pure lasers, especially on something like the TW that can boat more of them.
Logic 10/10
Edited by E N E R G Y, 03 September 2014 - 08:38 AM.
#9
Posted 03 September 2014 - 09:10 AM
Ruccus, on 03 September 2014 - 08:29 AM, said:
The jets are hard locked to the chassis, like the engine and ferro armor are. A version of the Summoner without hardwired jets does not enter production until 3119, current year in game is 3049.
#10
Posted 04 September 2014 - 06:30 AM
Escef, on 03 September 2014 - 09:10 AM, said:
The jets are hard locked to the chassis, like the engine and ferro armor are. A version of the Summoner without hardwired jets does not enter production until 3119, current year in game is 3049.
Had it had MWO's 'hover jets' rather than true Battletech jump jets, the Summoner would have lost its jump jets well before 3119.
Though to be honest, if they'd just unnerf jump jets I think I'd have a huge amount of fun with the Summoner (I already like the mech, I just see the flaws in it as well).
#11
Posted 04 September 2014 - 11:50 AM
#12
Posted 08 September 2014 - 08:03 AM
#13
Posted 13 October 2014 - 06:55 PM
E N E R G Y, on 03 September 2014 - 08:37 AM, said:
Now, as you know, jump jetting was severely nerfed. Thus, the 5JJ in the summoner now means less than ever before.
Furthermore, a good loadout with the summoner was the dual ppc/ac5 combo, but, PPCs now have been nerfed aswell and there's no logical reason to take them over pure lasers, especially on something like the TW that can boat more of them.
Logic 10/10
You gave the most accurate answer.
With the coming jump jet thrust and turn-rate update, how do you think this will change combat dynamcs and effectiveness of jump-jet capable builds?
Also I have to ask, which 5 missile system builds does a Timber Wolf do better than the Summoner?
I've seen some interesting 5 SSRM/SRM builds out there on Summoners
[Edited typos]
Edited by HeroForHire, 13 October 2014 - 07:00 PM.
#14
Posted 19 October 2014 - 06:25 PM
#16
Posted 21 October 2014 - 07:42 AM
But all that said; I am working on my 3 summoners right now and now that I found builds that work for each variant I am finding the summoner with skills to be a very powerful and effective mech. I try to keep stock omnipods on the mechs and adjust the load out according to that mech setup and omnipods. Makes getting XP and that grind more fun across the board to me.
Had a personal best last night with 2 kills 2 assists and 1213 damage on the B with 5 SSRM-4's, I harpooned a Solo D. Whale and ripped him up well, soooo fun
#17
Posted 28 October 2014 - 12:06 PM
I mean, they are going to have to give us MASC and stuff sooner or later (not to mention new weapons, particularly for IS; that I'm looking forward to) and on a 75-ton heavy I'd prefer slightly more favorable hardpoints and more tonnage to devote to weaponry over that much engine...
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users