A Heavy Is Ecm-Able Mech?
#1
Posted 23 October 2014 - 11:40 AM
#2
Posted 23 October 2014 - 11:56 AM
#3
Posted 23 October 2014 - 11:57 AM
#4
Posted 23 October 2014 - 12:22 PM
#5
Posted 23 October 2014 - 12:52 PM
TygerLily, on 23 October 2014 - 11:56 AM, said:
Versus 3.
Kitfox, MystLynx and Hellbringer.
5 versus 3.
25 ton, 30 ton, 35 ton, 40 ton, 100 ton for IS currently.
25 ton, 30 ton, 65 ton for Clan currently.
Currently as in either already here or listed to come at the moment.
#6
Posted 23 October 2014 - 12:58 PM
Koniving, on 23 October 2014 - 12:52 PM, said:
Kitfox, MystLynx and Hellbringer.
5 versus 3.
25 ton, 30 ton, 35 ton, 40 ton, 100 ton for IS currently.
25 ton, 30 ton, 65 ton for Clan currently.
Currently as in either already here or listed to come at the moment.
The IS could use a moderate speed ECM mech. The Atlas is nice, but being slow it's has issues. The Loki can stick with the Dire Wolves or run with the faster mechs, making it potentially a bit scarier. The IS could use something to counter that.
Or, they could just tweak ECM and then open up more mechs to carry it.
#7
Posted 23 October 2014 - 01:06 PM
Koniving, on 23 October 2014 - 12:52 PM, said:
Kitfox, MystLynx and Hellbringer.
5 versus 3.
25 ton, 30 ton, 35 ton, 40 ton, 100 ton for IS currently.
25 ton, 30 ton, 65 ton for Clan currently.
Currently as in either already here or listed to come at the moment.
RIGHT! I forgot the Myst Lynx...good call.
#8
Posted 23 October 2014 - 01:08 PM
Bront, on 23 October 2014 - 12:58 PM, said:
I like this option.
And lets face it... ECM isn't a must-have in Battletech. If anything it's a nicety that you can often do without. (BAP on the other hand is the most overpowered P.o.S. you can possibly get for 1.5 tons when it comes to Megamek and double-blind rules. You want a Jesus Box? Go with BAP! But then again, BAP can detect things that are not in your line of sight, for incredible ranges... when it actually succeeds in a roll. Thankfully that's rare, but it's similar to Seismic in MWO, except with a range of 1,000+ meters in all directions, no matter what is in between you.)
#9
Posted 23 October 2014 - 01:09 PM
Koniving, on 23 October 2014 - 01:08 PM, said:
And lets face it... ECM isn't a must-have in Battletech. If anything it's a nicety that you can often do without. (BAP on the other hand is the most overpowered P.o.S. you can possibly get for 1.5 tons when it comes to Megamek and double-blind rules. You want a Jesus Box? Go with BAP! But then again, BAP can detect things that are not in your line of sight, for incredible ranges... when it actually succeeds in a roll. Thankfully that's rare, but it's similar to Seismic in MWO, except with a range of 1,000+ meters in all directions, no matter what is in between you.)
This is why I play simple slug it out table top
#10
Posted 23 October 2014 - 01:11 PM
Bront, on 23 October 2014 - 01:09 PM, said:
This is why I play simple slug it out table top
Not that I could see.
BAP in use. Fun read.
#12
Posted 23 October 2014 - 01:27 PM
#13
Posted 23 October 2014 - 02:21 PM
That being said, I would like the ECM to work differently than it does at the moment. But since players have been clamouring for that for some time and nothing came out of it, I guess we have to work with the current...erm...solution.
And in this context we need an ECM option in the 40-100 ton range.
Not neccessarily a heavy, though. Especially since the Wardog comes with its own problems. (lack of variants, rather late introduction date, goofy looks = all leg hitboxes and almost no CT hitbox)
Edited by Molossian Dog, 24 October 2014 - 02:05 AM.
#14
Posted 24 October 2014 - 01:45 AM
With the hellbringer and it's 3 variants all capable of ecm, the myst lynx and it's 3 variants all capable of ecm and the kitfox and it's 3 variants all capable of ecm that's 9 to 5 ecm mechs in favour of the clans, who (the clans) in canon disapproved of ecm in the first place and the inner sphere was noted for using it.....
If anyone is looking to provide balance this nearly 2 to 1 imbalance should be considered.
Edited by Mark Brandhauber, 24 October 2014 - 01:50 AM.
#15
Posted 24 October 2014 - 04:01 AM
But ECM is not OP than the discussion about a ECM capable IS Heavy Mech is not necessary.
Before i want to see more ECM Mechs i want to see a working information warfare system with a ECM as one part of this pillar - instead of being the pillar itself.
#16
Posted 24 October 2014 - 07:06 AM
I do agree with OP though. More ECM mechs are a boon to the tactical aspect game. Since the Kitfox is the only clanner with ecm at the moment, running it without ecm is usually going to lead to more losses than wins.
Didn't they remove ECM from a bunch of IS mechs that would normally have it in BT? Let's just add that back to some of them when Wave 2 hits.
Edited by MadLibrarian, 24 October 2014 - 07:09 AM.
#17
Posted 23 December 2014 - 11:57 AM
"Originally intended as a stealthy hunter-killer of light and medium 'Mechs for the SLDF, the Grasshopper entered service in 2780" (c) Sarna
And TRO says about covert ops.
I guess thats reason enough (i guess you noticed, for ECM capability in MWO mech doesn't need one in TT)
UPD Though Resistance page says it will be not EMC-able. Well, no tears from me. But seemed like best candidate..
Edited by Sigmar Sich, 23 December 2014 - 12:07 PM.
#18
Posted 23 December 2014 - 12:18 PM
#19
Posted 05 January 2015 - 06:05 PM
Edited by Zephonarch II, 05 January 2015 - 06:11 PM.
#20
Posted 06 January 2015 - 01:17 PM
That said I do think that GRF-2N (Star League era Griffin w/ ECM) should added to the game.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users