Jump to content

Liao Is Doomed.


52 replies to this topic

#1 Rosscoe

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 73 posts
  • LocationCrazy Canuck Land!

Posted 29 December 2014 - 09:56 PM

No amount of Bonus is going to save Liao from be coming A battle field for Marik, Davion, & Stiner to fight over.

That being said. Who will conqoure the home world first yea figure? (or if its even possible!)

#2 Roadbeer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 8,160 posts
  • LocationWazan, Zion Cluster

Posted 29 December 2014 - 10:00 PM



#3 Basskicker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 304 posts
  • LocationNashville, Tennessee

Posted 29 December 2014 - 10:01 PM

I will just leave this here.



:D

Grrr youtube owner nolike sharing.

Edited by Basskicker, 29 December 2014 - 10:04 PM.


#4 Karl Marlow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,277 posts

Posted 29 December 2014 - 10:01 PM

I wish we had the option of joining the defence of other IS factions the way we can against the clans.

#5 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 29 December 2014 - 10:06 PM

We, the FLW, needs the pathetic Capellan Confederation somewhat intact, so we don't have to fight both Steiners and Davions. Kapteyn Concord is supposed to be still valid. Let us help these Liaos!

#6 Milkman Luke

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 65 posts
  • Location407

Posted 30 December 2014 - 12:09 AM

House Liao is merely benevolently making way to provide room for the waves of child soldiers and refugees being thrown at us. We allow them to grieve for the loss of their parents by flailing wildly on undefended planets and hurling themselves against our unmanned turret systems.

#7 Leopardo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,690 posts

Posted 30 December 2014 - 12:45 AM

Tell you what - liao have only 1 problem - number of pilots. we play we win! but we have not enough games . also our unit plays at different time.

#8 ShinVector

    Liao Mercenary

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 3,711 posts

Posted 30 December 2014 - 01:14 AM

View PostLeopardo, on 30 December 2014 - 12:45 AM, said:

Tell you what - liao have only 1 problem - number of pilots. we play we win! but we have not enough games . also our unit plays at different time.


Might change when they give other time zones a chance... Currently the game is focused on NA. Oh well.

#9 MingTheMerciless

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 200 posts
  • LocationSomewhere between here and Sian

Posted 30 December 2014 - 04:02 AM

It is tough being Liao at the moment and I think the CC is losing more planets than we've ever lost! The majority of times that I have dropped and managed to find enough fellow LIAO pilots be they [APOC], [GS]. [4TCR] etc. - we have won.

However, am sure many of them can't be online 24/7.

Currently, the way CW is working is that it does not take into account factors that would normally work in favour of an opponent being pushed back into a smaller area: shorter lines of communications, less planets to defend, quicker response times, more defensible planets and a higher density of defending units per planet.

Right now, it is a straight 12 v 12 AND it doesn't take into account the number of wins/losses in total just who is on top when the specific invasion cycles ends, which is TZ specific. Doesn't help me much as I am in the Euro TZ.

Also......isn't the IS being attacked by the clans? Shouldn't we be putting our petty squabbles aside and go after the Clanners?

Just saying... <_<

Edited by WaiMingLee, 30 December 2014 - 04:02 AM.


#10 Triordinant

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,495 posts
  • LocationThe Dark Side of the Moon

Posted 30 December 2014 - 04:21 AM

View PostWaiMingLee, on 30 December 2014 - 04:02 AM, said:

Also......isn't the IS being attacked by the clans? Shouldn't we be putting our petty squabbles aside and go after the Clanners?

From a roleplaying point of view, you are correct (but roleplayers are few and far in between). From a practical point of view, the way CW is now it's far more likely for an average IS player to win and earn more cbills/XPs if they fight only IS enemies (assuming they play CW at all).

#11 Thorn Hallis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,902 posts
  • LocationUnited States of Paranoia

Posted 30 December 2014 - 04:21 AM

View PostWaiMingLee, on 30 December 2014 - 04:02 AM, said:

Also......isn't the IS being attacked by the clans? Shouldn't we be putting our petty squabbles aside and go after the Clanners?

Just saying... <_<


The Clans never took a planet away from Liao, so there is no reason to go after 'em.

#12 Alexander Steel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hunter
  • The Hunter
  • 1,031 posts

Posted 30 December 2014 - 06:06 AM

Quote

Currently, the way CW is working is that it does not take into account factors that would normally work in favour of an opponent being pushed back into a smaller area: shorter lines of communications, less planets to defend, quicker response times, more defensible planets and a higher density of defending units per planet.


It also doesn't take into account the factors that would work against a country being pushed back and losing planets that had major war manufacturing on them.

#13 Maxwell Albritten

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 426 posts
  • LocationWoogi, Taurian Concordat

Posted 30 December 2014 - 07:01 AM

View PostWaiMingLee, on 30 December 2014 - 04:02 AM, said:

However, am sure many of them can't be online 24/7.


Well, they need to step up their game then! I mean, do they really need to eat and sleep EVERY day?


View PostWaiMingLee, on 30 December 2014 - 04:02 AM, said:

Also......isn't the IS being attacked by the clans? Shouldn't we be putting our petty squabbles aside and go after the Clanners?


I help the Dracs whenever I can, but even the most honorless clanner is better than a FedRat.

#14 BlakeAteIt

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 394 posts

Posted 30 December 2014 - 07:37 AM



#15 poopenshire

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Referee
  • The Referee
  • 684 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 30 December 2014 - 07:47 AM

I hate to say this, but we need all House factions in tact. We need to stop fighting each other and just take it to the clans.

#16 Jacob Side

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 390 posts

Posted 30 December 2014 - 07:50 AM

disagree Poopershire,

Laio must disappear from the map

#17 Faith McCarron

    Banned - Cheating

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 607 posts

Posted 30 December 2014 - 08:21 AM

View PostJacob Side, on 30 December 2014 - 07:50 AM, said:

disagree Poopershire,

Laio must disappear from the map


Propaganda minister might want to learn to spell better.

#18 BlakeAteIt

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 394 posts

Posted 30 December 2014 - 08:44 AM

View PostJacob Side, on 30 December 2014 - 07:50 AM, said:

disagree Poopershire, Laio msut diappear from the map


It's spelled T-e-t-a-t-a-e.

#19 Maxwell Albritten

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 426 posts
  • LocationWoogi, Taurian Concordat

Posted 30 December 2014 - 08:55 AM

View Postpoopenshire, on 30 December 2014 - 07:47 AM, said:

I hate to say this, but we need all House factions in tact. We need to stop fighting each other and just take it to the clans.


Then please lead by example and have all your forces on the clan front. Surely the most honorable actions of the angelic and pure Davion will inspire us Liao to a greater standard.

#20 MayGay

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 304 posts
  • LocationOntario

Posted 30 December 2014 - 09:32 AM

It's for your own good, psychopaths are unfit for leadership.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users