2
Northern Is Houses: Stop It!
Started by Roadbeer, Jan 04 2015 09:02 AM
53 replies to this topic
#41
Posted 01 February 2015 - 09:06 PM
If you want to fight Clanners that much, attack something the Clans hold. And by the way, I rarely see many planets with players on them anyway. But maybe that is a time zone issue.
#42
Posted 01 February 2015 - 09:17 PM
SuomiWarder, on 01 February 2015 - 09:06 PM, said:
If you want to fight Clanners that much, attack something the Clans hold. And by the way, I rarely see many planets with players on them anyway. But maybe that is a time zone issue.
Love to, but we can't attack, only defend. And afaik, the DCMS have asked us to stop taking planets around our embassy. So we are unable to further our push north through Kurita.
So it's the slow grind through Steiner for us.
#43
Posted 01 February 2015 - 09:44 PM
we came within a hairs breadth of taking a csj planet tonight super sad
#44
Posted 08 February 2015 - 03:43 PM
My bad then, I thought that all IS units had access to attacking clan worlds. I could have sworn that we attacked Clan worlds where the mixed group on the IS was from multiple houses.
But I could just have a faulty memory - especially with the "chemo brain" effects of my anti-cancer pills. (Too many hours working on unshielded mech power plants I suppose).
But I could just have a faulty memory - especially with the "chemo brain" effects of my anti-cancer pills. (Too many hours working on unshielded mech power plants I suppose).
#45
Posted 08 February 2015 - 04:04 PM
Suomi, as someone who has had people in his life who suffered from "Chemo-head" you have my sympathy on that. Don't feel bad, it's taken a while for those of us who don't have that same issue to get our heads wrapped around this too.
#46
Posted 09 February 2015 - 05:10 PM
@Roadbeer I hate how we keep attacking yet we always lose every match. Even 12 man against full pug team.
#47
Posted 19 February 2015 - 12:44 PM
Roadbeer, on 01 February 2015 - 09:17 PM, said:
Love to, but we can't attack, only defend. And afaik, the DCMS have asked us to stop taking planets around our embassy. So we are unable to further our push north through Kurita.
So it's the slow grind through Steiner for us.
So it's the slow grind through Steiner for us.
dont be impatient. we will come to liberate you, too.
#49
Posted 19 February 2015 - 01:49 PM
Syn Pryde, on 19 February 2015 - 12:47 PM, said:
lovely. just keep infighting, the smell of infighting makes me want to bust a nut in my cooling pants
Infighting is what Marik does best.
If PGI gave us a way to fight within our borders, we'd be having a nice civil war going, barely paying attention to the outside world.
#53
Posted 21 February 2015 - 11:12 AM
OP has a point though. If Steiner, Kurita, and FRR were able to go all-out attack on the Clans, while Liao, Davion, and Marik went all-in to defend the Clan front at all costs, the 4 Clans would effectively have to fight all 6 IS factions.
Even if the southern IS end up all sucking and can't hold a world against Clans to save their life, the Clans would get zerged so hard that the northern IS could easily take more worlds than they lose.
But at the same time, that committment isn't likely to happen while IS factions are stabbing each other in the back. I suppose if we got creative with world-trading though, we could theoretically rearrange the map so that all six IS houses have attack lanes into Clan territory.
Even if the southern IS end up all sucking and can't hold a world against Clans to save their life, the Clans would get zerged so hard that the northern IS could easily take more worlds than they lose.
But at the same time, that committment isn't likely to happen while IS factions are stabbing each other in the back. I suppose if we got creative with world-trading though, we could theoretically rearrange the map so that all six IS houses have attack lanes into Clan territory.
#54
Posted 21 February 2015 - 10:52 PM
Steiner has lost somewhere around 100 systems. Only 50 or so of those were to the Clans...
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users