Unit Spreadsheet - House Kurita
#1
Posted 13 March 2015 - 05:20 AM
Its been a couple months since last I rather through a major update of the Unit Spreadsheet so I'm asking for your help. Please take a look at your units and provide me as you can the latest information so I can make sure everything is as accurate as possible.
https://docs.google....SkCo/edit#gid=0
Thanks in advance
Zeece
#2
Posted 13 March 2015 - 06:42 AM
#3
Posted 13 March 2015 - 07:25 AM
#4
Posted 13 March 2015 - 10:12 AM
#5
Posted 13 March 2015 - 11:49 AM
#6
Posted 13 March 2015 - 12:01 PM
Edited by Lord Ikka, 13 March 2015 - 12:02 PM.
#7
Posted 13 March 2015 - 12:04 PM
#8
Posted 13 March 2015 - 12:21 PM
#9
Posted 13 March 2015 - 01:56 PM
now i only wish that only half of the reported players of the mentioned units would play cw.
#10
Posted 13 March 2015 - 02:30 PM
MahKraah, on 13 March 2015 - 01:56 PM, said:
now i only wish that only half of the reported players of the mentioned units would play cw.
common problem for everyone. i think every kuritan group that has responded has said at least 70 members, yet noone can consistently run 2 companies per unit in CW yet. just imagine if we did.
#11
Posted 13 March 2015 - 03:02 PM
Stealth Raptor, on 13 March 2015 - 02:30 PM, said:
common problem for everyone. i think every kuritan group that has responded has said at least 70 members, yet noone can consistently run 2 companies per unit in CW yet. just imagine if we did.
That would be awesome! I'm sure if each unit could, they would.
#12
Posted 13 March 2015 - 03:12 PM
Crockdaddy, on 13 March 2015 - 06:42 AM, said:
Thank you sir!
Novawrecker, on 13 March 2015 - 12:21 PM, said:
Noooooooooooooo!!!!!!!
ManaValkyrie, on 13 March 2015 - 12:04 PM, said:
Updated.. Thanks mate!
Lord Ikka, on 13 March 2015 - 12:01 PM, said:
Updated! Thanks mate!
YCSLiesmith, on 13 March 2015 - 07:25 AM, said:
Draw me a picture so that I make appreciate its grandeur!
#13
Posted 13 March 2015 - 03:22 PM
I'd like to suggest that you remove the columns for "% of Unit Competitive, 12-man NA rankings, 12-man rankings EU" as these are all incredibly subjective metrics.
Unit rankings in a particular league may be relevant but change on a daily/weekly basis, unit rankings overall are really not measurable.
Edited by pwnface, 13 March 2015 - 03:23 PM.
#14
Posted 13 March 2015 - 03:28 PM
pwnface, on 13 March 2015 - 03:22 PM, said:
I'd like to suggest that you remove the columns for "% of Unit Competitive, 12-man NA rankings, 12-man rankings EU" as these are all incredibly subjective metrics.
Unit rankings in a particular league may be relevant but change on a daily/weekly basis, unit rankings overall are really not measurable.
I'm going to be doing an overhaul this weekend and the ranking will be hidden until I can find a more consistent ranking system from the comp community. As is those are from September and the last time TheMagician gave me any info... <grin>
#15
Posted 13 March 2015 - 03:38 PM
Zeece, on 13 March 2015 - 03:28 PM, said:
I'm going to be doing an overhaul this weekend and the ranking will be hidden until I can find a more consistent ranking system from the comp community. As is those are from September and the last time TheMagician gave me any info... <grin>
Eek! Unit ELO!
#16
Posted 13 March 2015 - 03:43 PM
Zeece, on 13 March 2015 - 03:28 PM, said:
I'm going to be doing an overhaul this weekend and the ranking will be hidden until I can find a more consistent ranking system from the comp community. As is those are from September and the last time TheMagician gave me any info... <grin>
I don't think you'll find a consistent ranking system from the comp community at all. Relying on one person's opinion is pretty dangerous. Maybe instead you can put what place each team ranked for a particular league for the most recent season?
Like..
RHoD - 1st place
or
MCW - 3rd place etc.
Every league has different rules and different teams, let people draw their own conclusions based on how teams ACTUALLY placed in an event. You already have columns for certain leagues, you can easily just put 1st or 2nd etc instead of an X mark.
Just a thought..
Edited by pwnface, 13 March 2015 - 03:44 PM.
#18
Posted 15 March 2015 - 01:34 PM
pwnface, on 13 March 2015 - 03:43 PM, said:
I don't think you'll find a consistent ranking system from the comp community at all. Relying on one person's opinion is pretty dangerous. Maybe instead you can put what place each team ranked for a particular league for the most recent season?
Like..
RHoD - 1st place
or
MCW - 3rd place etc.
Every league has different rules and different teams, let people draw their own conclusions based on how teams ACTUALLY placed in an event. You already have columns for certain leagues, you can easily just put 1st or 2nd etc instead of an X mark.
Just a thought..
I'm getting rid of the Ranking Columns until the comp teams can get a good mechanism to keep it updated consistently. Just going to give units the ability to give me ticks for yes or now for each league.
#19
Posted 15 March 2015 - 02:27 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users