Looking To Upgrade My Gpu
#1
Posted 17 August 2015 - 02:43 PM
Important things to note:
I stream, I mod, I use the same gpu for 3-4 years
My system:
mobo: MSI Z97-G45 Gaming
cpu: i7 4790 @ 4.5ghz
gpu: reference 7950 @ 950mhz
psu: xfx pro 850w
ram: 8 gbs
hd: seagate 2tb mechanical drive
#2
Posted 17 August 2015 - 02:51 PM
I suggest you do research on that though.
#3
Posted 17 August 2015 - 03:45 PM
If you do not find the old guys: Team green is lower heat. Team red is better at compiling. They are close in performance. If you want 3d in MWO green is the only supported one. Free sync or G sync in your monitor may matter free is a less expensive option. If you want 4k plan on buying a few of those or two of the top end cards.
#4
Posted 17 August 2015 - 04:44 PM
Gumon Choji, on 17 August 2015 - 03:45 PM, said:
This
Also: You're gon'a have to wait a few more years to meet the Three Tier Rule economically …
#5
Posted 17 August 2015 - 08:04 PM
Cheapest is a MSI GTX 980 for $469.60 (Plus a Free Mousepad and a Free Copy of Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain): http://www.newegg.co...ID=3938566&SID=
if you must stick to your $350 Budget, then GTX 970 or R9 290X For Single, or X-Fire 7950 with a 7950/7970 or R9 280/280X
Edited by Lord Letto, 17 August 2015 - 08:32 PM.
#6
Posted 18 August 2015 - 02:33 AM
the 290X/390/X are build for 1440P and 4K gaming with the true 4GB to 8GB buffer vs the 970 3.5GB VRAM
also to note that the 512bit memory bus is way better when rendering high res pictures.
Crossfire is great for other games but not for this game
so if you play this game more often
then stick to a single powerful GPU
if you can sell off your HD7950
you might be able to afford the R9 390X or Fury
#7
Posted 18 August 2015 - 03:55 AM
I guess the question is what is prompting the GPU change?
#8
Posted 18 August 2015 - 08:50 AM
The big thing for me right now is that 8gb of ram on the 390 because as it sits I'm already pulling almost a full 3gbs from my 7950 with modded skyrim. Now what I'm wondering about is if one can overclock the 970 enough to make up for that lack of ram. Idealy I would like a gpu with 6gbs but the only one that has that is the 980ti, which is way beyond my budget.
The only other thing working in the 970s favor is the power draw, which I really like.
These are the pros on cons I'm looking at.
#10
Posted 18 August 2015 - 02:00 PM
If 4GB is enough for the Fury at 4K ( and that in my opinion is very detable) then there isn't much of a conversation.
Any top end card from either side is more than sufficient for 1080P.
And for the record the 970 has 4GB. It can address 4GB.
Now I'd you want to talk about how it's segmented and utilised by all means go for it; I won't disagree with you.
It is however still one of the best cards on the market and more than enough for 1080P
Edited by DV McKenna, 18 August 2015 - 02:01 PM.
#11
Posted 18 August 2015 - 02:58 PM
Keep in mind that a sufficiently modded Skyrim can tax just about any computer to its limit (though some of that might be because it's single-threaded), so that's taking a game way beyond what's intended. I agree with DV that 4GB isn't going to struggle at 1080p for gaming in general, at all.
Edited by Catamount, 18 August 2015 - 03:00 PM.
#12
Posted 18 August 2015 - 10:12 PM
#13
Posted 19 August 2015 - 11:13 PM
#14
Posted 20 August 2015 - 06:31 PM
Lordred, on 19 August 2015 - 11:13 PM, said:
Sadly the max oc I could get with the reference cooler is 950mhz core clock and 1375 on the memory. I just can't push this card anymore without putting money in to better cooling, in which case I'd be better off buying a new card instead.
Lord Letto, on 18 August 2015 - 10:12 PM, said:
Money isn't the problem. If I wanted to, I could buy a 980ti. The problem is the 3-4 year upgrade cycle. $650+ for 4 years just sounds like to much of a wast to me. I did think about the 980 but seemed like if I where to buy it, I might as well go for the 980ti.
#15
Posted 20 August 2015 - 06:41 PM
DarkBazerker, on 20 August 2015 - 06:31 PM, said:
As a Titan X owner, always go as big as you can afford, it is most often times worth it.
Edited by Lordred, 20 August 2015 - 06:43 PM.
#16
Posted 20 August 2015 - 07:23 PM
#17
Posted 21 August 2015 - 01:14 AM
AMD's HBM idea has great potentials and seems solidify their future positions in anyway they want to up the GPU capability.
Edited by cx5, 21 August 2015 - 01:15 AM.
#18
Posted 21 August 2015 - 02:47 AM
At 1080p under dx11 it performs about equal (unless you have a slow cpu), but at high res or under dx12 the fury should be faster.
There are also a few good freesync screens now, about $100 cheaper than the gsync equivalent. Read reviews though, many freesync screens have annoying quirks. Personally I wouldn't buy any yet, as there are a few freesync/gsync models with VA panels in the works.
Edited by Flapdrol, 21 August 2015 - 02:55 AM.
#19
Posted 21 August 2015 - 06:47 AM
If it is simply between the 390X and 970, the 390X is faster so that shouldn't even be a question. A 290X will perform almost exactly the same, though.
The main rule with GPUs is if you're not upgrading every 2 years, get the best one you can afford. I'd recommend getting the 980Ti at this point if you can afford it.
#20
Posted 21 August 2015 - 10:58 AM
xWiredx, on 21 August 2015 - 06:47 AM, said:
If it is simply between the 390X and 970, the 390X is faster so that shouldn't even be a question. A 290X will perform almost exactly the same, though.
The main rule with GPUs is if you're not upgrading every 2 years, get the best one you can afford. I'd recommend getting the 980Ti at this point if you can afford it.
I game at 1080/1050, depending what game I'm playing. To be honest I was leaning towards the 390/390x (msi), more then I was the 970 (zotac). But I wanted to ask around cause I thought there has to be something I'm missing with the 970. After all I've been a ati/amd user for a long time, and I felt like I was being biased.
While I respect your opinion, I do not share it. Its not a matter of price but rather value for me. You see for $330(http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814127874) I can get an extra 30-40 fps increase plus all the extra bells and whistles. If I were to add an extra $330 (http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814500378) I could gain another 20-30 fps more then the 390. So the question I have to ask myself, is the extra performance worth the extra cost to me. For me personal its not, not for $660. I might have high standards but, for $650+ I expect a lot more performance. I gave Intel crap for the same thing when they release ivy bridge, when Ivy only had 10% performance boost over Sandy.
The other thing to remember is DX12 games are being developed. With Radeon having more to gain from DX12 then Nividia, Nividia needs to pick up there game or drop some prices.
7950vs390 http://gpuboss.com/g...-Radeon-HD-7950
390vs980ti http://gpuboss.com/g...372036823111234
Edited by DarkBazerker, 21 August 2015 - 11:01 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users