8V8 Vs 12V12
#1
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:41 AM
#2
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:45 AM
#3
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:45 AM
#4
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:48 AM
I preferred 8v8; It was much easier to have a meaningful affect on the outcome of the match if you got placed with a bad team.
#5
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:48 AM
#6
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:49 AM
#7
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:49 AM
Darian DelFord, on 20 November 2015 - 11:41 AM, said:
Personally, having tried out 4v4 and 2v2 on the PTS, and having been around during 8v8 I still prefer 12v12 most of the time. Although some maps would probably be better on 8v8. Opinions will vary.
Also it cuts down on server costs.
#8
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:56 AM
#9
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:58 AM
#10
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:59 AM
4vs4 would be even more distinct from 12vs12, and judging by the PTS, fun as hell.
#11
Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:59 AM
Especially in the group queue
#12
Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:18 PM
1v1 -- Solaris style duels
2v2 -- Solaris again
4v4 -- Lance on Lance combat
There is no lore explanation for 8v8 though.
#13
Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:29 PM
I say "some objective game mode", because eff Conquest. Sad when we don't even have the game mode variety Hawken has.
#14
Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:42 PM
#15
Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:43 PM
cdlord, on 20 November 2015 - 12:18 PM, said:
1v1 -- Solaris style duels
2v2 -- Solaris again
4v4 -- Lance on Lance combat
There is no lore explanation for 8v8 though.
I can pretty much guarentee as many were against it as for it. I personally never wanted 12 vs 12 as I loved 8 vs 8 from MPBT Solaris.
#16
Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:45 PM
#17
Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:47 PM
Coolant, on 20 November 2015 - 12:45 PM, said:
Oh, to do full battalion v battalion (36v36) would be awesome!
#18
Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:53 PM
1v1, 2v2,3v3,4v4,5v5... 12v12
it would spark the competitive nature in us and I really think it would be very successful
#19
Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:54 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users