Jump to content

8V8 Vs 12V12


96 replies to this topic

#1 Darian DelFord

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 3,342 posts
  • LocationFlorida

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:41 AM

Someone refresh my memory why PGIGP ever did this idiotic move? I can noy remember. But playing 4v4 and 2v2 on the test server is so much more fun Why did they up it again?

#2 JohnnyWayne

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,629 posts

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:45 AM

More players on fewer servers => less server costs.

#3 3xnihilo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 2,980 posts
  • LocationPennsylvania

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:45 AM

12v12 began shortly before I started. I have often though 8v8 would be interesting since your performance (good or bad) would have a larger impact on the outcome of the match. But, I wasn't here so I don't know the reasoning behind changing it.

#4 Death Proof

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 546 posts

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:48 AM

It's a money thang.

I preferred 8v8; It was much easier to have a meaningful affect on the outcome of the match if you got placed with a bad team.

#5 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:48 AM

It was also requested by many who wanted to follow lore by using an IS company.

#6 Mister Blastman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 8,444 posts
  • LocationIn my Mech (Atlanta, GA)

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:49 AM

I prefer 8v8 or 4v4 over 12v12 any day. Please bring back 8v8.

#7 WarHippy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,835 posts

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:49 AM

View PostDarian DelFord, on 20 November 2015 - 11:41 AM, said:

Someone refresh my memory why PGIGP ever did this idiotic move? I can noy remember. But playing 4v4 and 2v2 on the test server is so much more fun Why did they up it again?

Personally, having tried out 4v4 and 2v2 on the PTS, and having been around during 8v8 I still prefer 12v12 most of the time. Although some maps would probably be better on 8v8. Opinions will vary.

Also it cuts down on server costs.

#8 Mechteric

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 7,308 posts
  • LocationRTP, NC

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:56 AM

Also, because everyone clamored for it, thinking "more is better!"

#9 Pyroth

    Rookie

  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • LocationLouisiana

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:58 AM

I thought the game was a lot more fun with 8 v 8. 12 v 12 is part of why we have so many balance issues now because of all the additional mechs firing on a target. Brawling was a lot more common in 8 v 8 and imo was more fun than just corner peeking all day.

#10 jss78

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 2,575 posts
  • LocationHelsinki

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:59 AM

Were they to give us one alternative team size, I'd actually take 4vs4 over 8vs8.

4vs4 would be even more distinct from 12vs12, and judging by the PTS, fun as hell.

#11 cSand

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,589 posts
  • LocationCanada, eh

Posted 20 November 2015 - 11:59 AM

Would like to see 8v8 return as well.

Especially in the group queue

#12 CDLord HHGD

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,190 posts
  • Location"You're not comp if you're not stock."

Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:18 PM

All during 8v8 we were asking for and anticipating 12v12. 12v12 should stay but they should add more modes too.

1v1 -- Solaris style duels
2v2 -- Solaris again
4v4 -- Lance on Lance combat

There is no lore explanation for 8v8 though.

#13 Rhaythe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,203 posts

Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:29 PM

Some variation would be nice. I think 8 versus 8 would be better suited to some objective-based gamemode, while the 12 versus 12 is just fine in skirmish and assault.

I say "some objective game mode", because eff Conquest. Sad when we don't even have the game mode variety Hawken has.

#14 Boris The Spider

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 447 posts

Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:42 PM

They should randomise it. So if your dropping as 4 or less you could be in either 4v4, 8v8 or 12v12.

#15 Pyroth

    Rookie

  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • LocationLouisiana

Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:43 PM

View Postcdlord, on 20 November 2015 - 12:18 PM, said:

All during 8v8 we were asking for and anticipating 12v12. 12v12 should stay but they should add more modes too.

1v1 -- Solaris style duels
2v2 -- Solaris again
4v4 -- Lance on Lance combat

There is no lore explanation for 8v8 though.


I can pretty much guarentee as many were against it as for it. I personally never wanted 12 vs 12 as I loved 8 vs 8 from MPBT Solaris.

#16 Coolant

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,079 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:45 PM

More action, more combat, more teammates, more enemies. I hated in MW4 long maps where it took you several minutes to even get to any action. With more mechs the action starts faster. Other combat games have much more on the battlefield than just 24 total. If the maps were a little larger I would like even more mechs on the battlefield. They just need to add respawn.

#17 CDLord HHGD

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,190 posts
  • Location"You're not comp if you're not stock."

Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:47 PM

View PostCoolant, on 20 November 2015 - 12:45 PM, said:

More action, more combat, more teammates, more enemies. I hated in MW4 long maps where it took you several minutes to even get to any action. With more mechs the action starts faster. Other combat games have much more on the battlefield than just 24 total. If the maps were a little larger I would like even more mechs on the battlefield. They just need to add respawn.

Oh, to do full battalion v battalion (36v36) would be awesome!

#18 FrontGuard

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 475 posts
  • LocationNew Jersey

Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:53 PM

this game would be great if we had them all...
1v1, 2v2,3v3,4v4,5v5... 12v12
it would spark the competitive nature in us and I really think it would be very successful

#19 MATRAKA14

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 443 posts

Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:54 PM

8 vs 8 was way more interesting and fun.

#20 Rhaythe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,203 posts

Posted 20 November 2015 - 12:58 PM

View PostMATRAKA14, on 20 November 2015 - 12:54 PM, said:

8 vs 8 was way more interesting and fun.

Dueling seemed like it was far more of a thing too. But who knows, maybe it's just rose-tinted glasses.



Oh wait, no it isn't...! :D





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users