Why have YOU chosen house Davion?
#61
Posted 05 January 2012 - 03:50 PM
i love their use of rct in combat, i despise how most other factions have their mech fetishes. Don't get me wrong i love mechs, but in combat a mixed force has many more uses and is by far more flexible.
#63
Posted 06 January 2012 - 12:22 PM
#64
Posted 09 January 2012 - 03:56 AM
#65
Posted 09 January 2012 - 11:37 AM
Edited by MonkeyDCecil, 09 January 2012 - 11:39 AM.
#66
Posted 09 January 2012 - 12:22 PM
#67
Posted 10 January 2012 - 01:30 PM
SexualBubblegumX, on 07 December 2011 - 04:59 AM, said:
it has a royal family, but embraces basic freedom and rights for the people.
I would say its more like Britain cough*Albion*cough in space if we had to draw any comparison with today’s nations.
#69
Posted 10 January 2012 - 01:43 PM
#70
Posted 10 January 2012 - 02:52 PM
#72
Posted 11 January 2012 - 01:38 PM
#73
Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:47 AM
P.S: Can you tell I am a Capellan fan.
#74
Posted 13 January 2012 - 09:46 AM
THE 3rdbreed, on 13 January 2012 - 06:47 AM, said:
As opposed to the Capellen Chancellor? "Great leader watches over you. He lets you starve because he cares."
And the FedSuns is not an "absolute monarchy." To be accurate, the Federated Suns government is a constitutional monarchy. You are right to say that the FedSuns isn't America in space. It's actually much closer to Great Britain.
#75
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:21 AM
Quote
At least we are honest about it
Quote
Constitutional by name maybe, but this 'constitution' does not restrict the First Prince it gives him absolute power! The Sourcebook says that the people have no real voice in the government. So maybe a Constitutionally Absolute Monarchy?
#76
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:10 AM
#77
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:05 AM
THE 3rdbreed, on 14 January 2012 - 06:21 AM, said:
There's a huge difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy. Traditionally, the concept of an absolute monarchy has been based on the concept of divine right (ex. the Mandate of Heaven or the Divine Right of Kings in Europe). An absolute monarch is capable of doing anything (at least in theory). The French Bourbon Dynasty is one of the best examples of this. While a Davion ruler might be able to get away with a lot in practice, that does not mean that he or she has the right to do so.
The FedSuns has a constitution. By itself this would disqualify the FedSuns from being an absolute monarchy. By establishing a rule of law a government technically places itself under the structure of the law. In fact, there are three rights granted to FedSuns citizens and protected by FedSun law. Furthermore, there are democratic systems within the Federated Suns which, while they do not necessarily make law, do give the people a real voice. I say a, "real voice," to qualify the difference between the civilian groups of the Federated Suns and real world systems like the progessive reforms in the late-era Russian monarchy. There are also other noble families in the FedSuns which hold significant hereditary territory and influence. These noble families can and have acted as foils to the Davions in the past, and make up a significant portion of the High Council (along with elected officials and military officers). While the High Council generally follows the lead of the Davion Family, the High Council and Privy Council have the responsibilty of running most of the day-to-day issues of the nation.
The Russian Czars, Chinese Emperors, French Bourbons, and Spanish Bourbons offer good real world examples of the traditional absolute monarchy. These are systems based on rulers who claim total power based on what they claim is religious right.
The British monarchy, regardless of what powers it may have had, was contained by the Magna Carta and centuries of struggle. Parliament, while it was not based on a written constitution (the FedSuns have an edge over the British crown there), is based on an oral constitution and tradition, and it possesses real political power, much like the High Council or the Privy Council.
Edited by Jack Gammel, 14 January 2012 - 08:22 AM.
#78
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:40 PM
#79
Posted 15 January 2012 - 07:15 PM
Quote
<p>
<p> </p>
<p>As I said, the Constitution <strong><u>gives</u></strong> the First Prince power to transcend and make law. If the law of the land gives the ruler power to transcend that law then the law is therefore not supreme and by definition not a constitution. A Citziens freedoms might be protected under law, but when that law is able to be completely rewritten and disregarded by the ruler, those same freedoms do not exist.</p>
<p> </p>
<div>
Quote
<div> </div>
<div>The "democratic systems" are irrelevant because they have no effect on the government! It says directly in the sourcebook that a planet's type of government is tied to the planet's aristocracy. When the Aristocracy turns the planet into a military dictatorship where do the people go? To there ruler; who happens to be the one leading the nobles, and who owns the judiciary that is supposed to deal out justice in the Prince's government.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>
Quote
<p> </p>
<p>As did every one of the Absolute monarchies you mentioned!</p>
<p> </p>
<div>
Quote
<p> </p>
<p>I am glad you mentioned the High Council, that popularly elected group of individuals who (according to every single sourcebook) "has lost all its power and is only a glorified rubber stamp for the Prince's policies"(pg 103).(Sound like the Estates-General of Louis XIV?). The Privy council is completely appointed by the Prince, and serves at the discretion of the Prince. Although the Privy Council and High Council do set forth the <strong><u>PRINCE'S</u></strong> policies, it is actually the ministry of administrative services that handles the day to day working of the government (which by the way is controlled by the Prince.)</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div>
Quote
<div> </div>
<div>One can consider that the Successor Lord's obsession with the Star League is religious. I am just saying.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
Quote
<div> </div>
</div>
<p>There is no such device for the FedSuns, and as I said there "constitution" is not a constitution at all. Parliment is NOT, I repeat <strong><u>NOT</u></strong>, the High Council or Privy Council. If you do not believe me you can take it up with the writers and Sourcebooks. Just as the FedSuns is not the USA-in-space(if it was I would join it), it is equally not Great Britain either. At worst it is Napoleanic France; a dictatorship that paints everything it does with a false veneer of "liberty"!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>With these choices, I go with Liao!</p>
</div>
<p> </p>
</div>
</div>
Edited by THE 3rdbreed, 17 January 2012 - 12:15 PM.
#80
Posted 15 January 2012 - 07:41 PM
Edited by Coralld, 16 January 2012 - 03:06 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














