2 AMS is enough.
3 AMS is pointless thanks to the flaw in the antimissile system.
Each AMS will target the same missile
3 AMS aren't 50% faster on killing a missile then 2 AMS are.
The tonnage and ammo consumption isn't worth a 3rd AMS.
IF AMS will get smart one day and start to target seperate missiles, then having 3 will might actually do something.
Currently, if an LRM 5 comes from the Left and an LRM 60 comes from the Right.
All 3 AMS will target the first missile out of the LRM 5 "volley" then the 2nd missile, then the 3rd.
AMS is to stupid to point one AMS at the LRM 5 volley and the other 2 AMS at the LRM 60 volley.
That said, if you want anti missile, you want dual AMS + AMS range + overcharge. Not 3 AMS.
3
The Anti Missile Mech (Video) "lrm Smasher"
Started by Oldbob10025, Jan 16 2016 12:20 PM
22 replies to this topic
#22
-
-
- The Boombox
- 4,469 posts
Member
- LocationCleveland, Ohio
Posted 26 January 2016 - 01:00 PM
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
But, u guys is doing it all wrong.
3AMS is like a toddler with 3 blankies.
Since you are new ill give you this advices if you REALLY want to troll LRM boats.
1. Buy a Locust E
2. Buy an XL190
3. Die many many many times but learn from it.
4. Since Puglandia is survival of the fittest - you can sneak off solo or in a 'wolfpack' and search out enemy LRM boats
5 Get you a nice Solo kill!!!
6 While doing so, learn how to pilot better
7. Join thisCult, eh, group
I mean, why rely on a passive waste of tonnage(AMS) when you can walk tall and strong as a Locust pilot???
That toddler is gonna have to grow up into a man/woman sooner or later, why not do it with some balls?
Yes this is a PSA.
But, u guys is doing it all wrong.
3AMS is like a toddler with 3 blankies.
Since you are new ill give you this advices if you REALLY want to troll LRM boats.
1. Buy a Locust E
2. Buy an XL190
3. Die many many many times but learn from it.
4. Since Puglandia is survival of the fittest - you can sneak off solo or in a 'wolfpack' and search out enemy LRM boats
5 Get you a nice Solo kill!!!
6 While doing so, learn how to pilot better
7. Join this
I mean, why rely on a passive waste of tonnage(AMS) when you can walk tall and strong as a Locust pilot???
That toddler is gonna have to grow up into a man/woman sooner or later, why not do it with some balls?
Yes this is a PSA.
#23
-
-
- Bad Company
- 851 posts
Member
Posted 03 February 2016 - 02:42 AM
LOADED, on 24 January 2016 - 05:05 AM, said:
2 AMS is enough.
3 AMS is pointless thanks to the flaw in the antimissile system.
Each AMS will target the same missile
3 AMS aren't 50% faster on killing a missile then 2 AMS are.
The tonnage and ammo consumption isn't worth a 3rd AMS.
IF AMS will get smart one day and start to target seperate missiles, then having 3 will might actually do something.
Currently, if an LRM 5 comes from the Left and an LRM 60 comes from the Right.
All 3 AMS will target the first missile out of the LRM 5 "volley" then the 2nd missile, then the 3rd.
AMS is to stupid to point one AMS at the LRM 5 volley and the other 2 AMS at the LRM 60 volley.
That said, if you want anti missile, you want dual AMS + AMS range + overcharge. Not 3 AMS.
3 AMS is pointless thanks to the flaw in the antimissile system.
Each AMS will target the same missile
3 AMS aren't 50% faster on killing a missile then 2 AMS are.
The tonnage and ammo consumption isn't worth a 3rd AMS.
IF AMS will get smart one day and start to target seperate missiles, then having 3 will might actually do something.
Currently, if an LRM 5 comes from the Left and an LRM 60 comes from the Right.
All 3 AMS will target the first missile out of the LRM 5 "volley" then the 2nd missile, then the 3rd.
AMS is to stupid to point one AMS at the LRM 5 volley and the other 2 AMS at the LRM 60 volley.
That said, if you want anti missile, you want dual AMS + AMS range + overcharge. Not 3 AMS.
Do you have some numbers to support this? My testing in the field doesn't seem to match your results.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
