28 replies to this topic

[ARM32]

AMD 8120 (8 core) on 3.8 - 4.0 Ghz, 760 Nvidia + 8Gb ddr3. Sometimes in FW <30FPS... Try lots of stuffs to fix it... Keep playing like this... FW leaderboard №91 (now)...

[hyperredbull23]

Can you overclock that one? If you can get it stable at 4.2 to 4.4 or even 4.5 that will help your fps alot. My quad core at 4.2 would run 50fps with deep dips. When I oc to 4.5 and 4.4 I had higher fps and less dips but ran way too hot with stock cooler so I back down to 4.3. I think I am going to get liquid cooling because I had steady 120 fps at 4.5

[ARM32]

hyperredbull23, on 15 September 2016 - 02:56 AM, said:

Can you overclock that one? If you can get it stable at 4.2 to 4.4 or even 4.5 that will help your fps alot. My quad core at 4.2 would run 50fps with deep dips. When I oc to 4.5 and 4.4 I had higher fps and less dips but ran way too hot with stock cooler so I back down to 4.3. I think I am going to get liquid cooling because I had steady 120 fps at 4.5

Allready overclocked from 3.1 and it's 81xx type, not 83xx - (4.0Ggz = max stable). The main problem - Fallout4, Witcher3, other games i can run >100FPS, but MWO 25-35... But, 1Y ago, FPS was ok, but, after some patches, it comes lower...

[hyperredbull23]

Dang well maybe it will run better on next level amd. If not I'm going i7 extreme

[xWiredx]

hyperredbull23, on 15 September 2016 - 02:00 AM, said:

I'm running an A4 880k r9 390 and 16gig of ram. I had fps issues as well on any settings, the game relies heavily on cpu power. With that I oc the cpu to 4.3 and raised NB cpu bridge from 1600 to 2000 plus oc the ram from 2133 to 2400. Now game runs steady at 80fps 1080p with drops to 65fps very high everything and AA turned off. Where it used to run my cpu at 95% at all times now it stays at 70 to 75%. Hopefully this helps out anyone else using amd

There's a guy named Bill floating around here that was/is using a 5GhZ (or near it) 83xx AMD FX chip and claimed to get a fluid 60fps, too. Then he measured his fps with Fraps and realized that his actual minimum fps bottomed out at 0 in some cases and was often below 30 even though his average was between 60 and 80 depending on the map.

In other words, either you have a PC literally running on magic unicorn blood or you don't actually know what your performance is like. AMD's IPC deficiency is massive, and this game knows it. That is why AMD users complaining about performance are immediately redirected to building new Intel systems around here.

[lpmagic]

unpark your cores, free them from their earthly restraints, search it on the forums here you will remain in trouble however, your cpu is simply not gonna run this game "great" gpu is a little low, but should be ok, the most i would expect after tweaking things to the max is about 40 FPS and even then it is going to dip in massive battles.

[Capt Jos]

Anyone else thing that maybe it might have something to do (also) with the addition of decals?

Before decals came out, I had okay fps on low settings. Now, I have 5-1 fps at max, so now it's unplayable. I was wondering if PGI would maybe tack on an option to disable decals in-game for those of us with lower end machines.

My system meets the minimum spec requirements and I have 64bit.

[Voodoomancer]

Speaking from similar experience: your Athlon is getting you.

I had an Athlon II X4 640 (4 physical cores, 3.0GHz, benches about 20% below the 860K on Anandtech Bench), paired with DDR2 and a Radeon HD 7870. Framerates dropped down to 25-35 FPS pretty often, it was visibly janky, and lights and Vipers were just unplayable. I upgraded to a Core i3-6100 and DDR4, same graphics card, and my framerates jumped; it stays over 60 most of the time, it's *very* perceptibly smoother, and Vipers are suddenly fun to play.

Given how much time you spend playing MWO, the upgrade to Skylake Core i3 or better should be worth it for you, even though it requires a full CPU/board/RAM upgrade.

[Tarl Cabot]

https://mwomercs.com...ost__p__5503414

Nvidia-enable hyperthreading may help out some.