Jump to content

FORUMS

Medium Mech Poll


17 replies to this topic

Poll: Do you want the Bushwacker in MWO? (49 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you want the Bushwacker?

  1. Yes, I want this Mech stomping around my battlefield! (37 votes [69.81%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 69.81%

  2. No, I don't want this Mech for MWO! (Insert reason here). (16 votes [30.19%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 30.19%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Rovertoo

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 84 posts

Posted 23 July 2012 - 04:33 PM

Vote if you want the Bushwacker in MWO!




Posted Image

#2 Barnum the Bear

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 52 posts
  • LocationThe forest

Posted 23 July 2012 - 04:42 PM

You'll have to wait a few years.

#3 solitaire

    Newbie

  • Elite Founder
  • 2 posts

Posted 23 July 2012 - 04:43 PM

Fun mech for sure

#4 x rehel

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 127 posts
  • LocationArcadia

Posted 23 July 2012 - 05:02 PM

wrong time line
maybe in a few year

#5 Bishop Steiner

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 4595 posts
  • LocationPort Moseby, Lyran Commonwealth

Posted 23 July 2012 - 06:22 PM

Well, I voted no, but it's a conditional no. Ya see, that real cool picture you posted?

That's the cover of the 3058 TRO.

It's 3049 now. In 7-8 years, I totally want the 'Wacker to be in the game. Tough little mech. I am just totally against doing it too early, after all we open the door for the 'Wacker and Uziel today, how do we justify not allowing in any other chassis all helter skelter, and what purpose does it even serve to HAVE a timeline any more.

Plus, there is little the Bushwacker does that the Centurion doesn't already do, so I would favor including other more diverse designs that are time-line appropriate before dragging in Uziels and Bushwackers.

Mecks like the Hatchetman, Sentinel, Assassin or Enforcer, iconic mech's that have never been given their 15 minutes of fame (at least in the modern era of MW3 and beyond)

#6 light487

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 1381 posts
  • LocationSydney, Australia

Posted 23 July 2012 - 06:39 PM

I voted no.. because it's only 3049..

but I also voted yes because when we get to the correct time, I would like it in.

I know you're new.. but please TRY to read the FAQs

#7 Shammus

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 46 posts
  • LocationAustin, Texas

Posted 23 July 2012 - 08:32 PM

Bushwhacker is a Clan Mech correct?

#8 Tripod

    Member

  • Veteran Founder
  • 54 posts

Posted 23 July 2012 - 10:13 PM

don't think so, pretty sure it's IS, just newer

#9 stealthed

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 178 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 24 July 2012 - 02:09 AM

Sarna says:
Spoiler


What this basically means is the bushwacker is around at the time, but only in prototype form and bugged. I do think the devs could get away with it when they introduce it with the clan invasion

Edited by stealthed, 24 July 2012 - 02:10 AM.


#10 BrokenDog

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 107 posts
  • LocationMiddlesex(UK)

Posted 24 July 2012 - 07:14 AM

.sarna.net/wiki/Bushwacker
General service 3058 or there abouts.

#11 Grimskar

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 49 posts

Posted 24 July 2012 - 03:17 PM

bushwacker is based on clan tech produced by the IS

#12 Riin Suul

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 528 posts

Posted 31 July 2012 - 08:59 AM

I voted for ALL the answers because DOWN WITH BAD POLLS!!!
seriously, if your poll has mutually exclusive answers, don't allow multiple selection

#13 Stickjock

    Member

  • Volunteer Moderators
  • PipPip
  • 2418 posts
  • LocationPetal, MS

Posted 31 July 2012 - 09:23 AM

Sarna.net shows' "Introduced: 3053"... so either way, it's still not going to be in game for a few years...

#14 RedAngel121

    Newbie

  • Legendary Founder
  • 6 posts

Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:27 AM

View Postlight487, on 23 July 2012 - 06:39 PM, said:

I voted no.. because it's only 3049..

but I also voted yes because when we get to the correct time, I would like it in.


i agree

#15 Deceptor

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 176 posts
  • LocationTrading my subscription for 40$ worth of overclocking accessories to meet minimum requirements (double heat sinks).

Posted 31 July 2012 - 02:18 PM

It's so frickin' versatile! I know maybe you vets avoided the MW4 series, but this thing really got some good hardpoints to it.

edit: Here's the rundown.

1x3 and 1x2 ballistic
1x3 and 1x2 missile
1x2 energy

Now obviously this has to be expanded to fit the REAL rules, but if the proportions are the same, this thing has armor and free weight to play just about every role there is besides straight assault. Plus I love it.

Edited by Deceptor, 31 July 2012 - 02:29 PM.


#16 Adrienne Vorton

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 3421 posts
  • LocationBerlin/ Germany

Posted 01 August 2012 - 04:01 AM

*sighs* well, i just got comfortable with the thought that i will probably never drive that one (or not too soon) ... and now you come up with that poll...thanks for reminding me ...:P

#17 Muffalopadus

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 25 posts
  • LocationElwood, IN

Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:19 PM

I want every mech in this game, I don't care why they shouldn't be because of timelines and canonical reasons. EVERY. MECH.

Edited by Muffalopadus, 02 August 2012 - 10:19 PM.


#18 Deceptor

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 176 posts
  • LocationTrading my subscription for 40$ worth of overclocking accessories to meet minimum requirements (double heat sinks).

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:11 PM

View PostMuffalopadus, on 02 August 2012 - 10:19 PM, said:

I want every mech in this game, I don't care why they shouldn't be because of timelines and canonical reasons. EVERY. MECH.


I feel like this much as well. I'm not so much a fan of canon, but I do think at least they can use inserting them over time to help develop the storyline.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users