Starting mech for House Steiner
#41
Posted 04 February 2012 - 08:32 AM
Also, isn't it pointless? Devs still didn't say how the game will be starting.
#42
Posted 04 February 2012 - 08:45 AM
#43
Posted 04 February 2012 - 09:09 AM
#44
Posted 04 February 2012 - 09:09 AM
ALSO: Don't confuse the Steiners by saying there are weight classes that aren't assault.
Edited by Flametrace, 04 February 2012 - 09:11 AM.
#45
Posted 07 February 2012 - 01:01 PM
#46
Posted 07 February 2012 - 01:13 PM
#47
Posted 08 February 2012 - 06:04 PM
My most favored Mech to stard with would either be a Catapult or an Archer...
After all i would fid in a Hunchback 4P as well... bring in some Disco to the IS
#48
Posted 09 February 2012 - 07:20 AM
Henry Pride, on 08 February 2012 - 06:04 PM, said:
My most favored Mech to stard with would either be a Catapult or an Archer...
After all i would fid in a Hunchback 4P as well... bring in some Disco to the IS
We respect you Battle Armor pilots, don't worry. It takes great fortitude to stride into battle with nothing but a prayer and a pop gun.
Running a -4P Hunchback in my TT mercenary campaign right now; so many lasers.
Edited by Sporkosophy, 09 February 2012 - 07:21 AM.
#49
Posted 09 February 2012 - 09:37 AM
Awesome 8T would be a nice mech to have either... 3 ppcs... and cold *hrhr*
#50
Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:59 PM
#51
Posted 09 February 2012 - 07:39 PM
#52
Posted 12 February 2012 - 02:43 AM
Edited by nubnub, 12 February 2012 - 02:47 AM.
#53
Posted 12 February 2012 - 02:58 AM
Quote
SSSSH! Don't let those Steiners find out that there are mechs other than assault! They might then progress to the use of tactics and combined arms!
#54
Posted 12 February 2012 - 09:56 AM
Longsword, on 12 February 2012 - 02:58 AM, said:
SSSSH! Don't let those Steiners find out that there are mechs other than assault! They might then progress to the use of tactics and combined arms!
Combined arms ? You either fire the LRMs or all the short range stuff from an Atlas, doing both is stupid usualy. Davions and their strange ideas........
#55
Posted 12 February 2012 - 01:32 PM
So we have to find an existing Mech to start with...
#56
Posted 12 February 2012 - 09:40 PM
Henry Pride, on 12 February 2012 - 01:32 PM, said:
So we have to find an existing Mech to start with...
Ah well, ATLAS it is. I was reading somewhere that there is going to be many systems to be claimed except each house will have 'safe-house' systems. I personally think systems close to but not in the inner inner-shpere will be the most valueable as they are shielded from the periphery clans and not too-hotly contested compared to the central systems.
#57
Posted 13 February 2012 - 01:26 AM
#58
Posted 13 February 2012 - 06:25 AM
Valcoer, on 13 February 2012 - 01:26 AM, said:
My friend, you have much to learn about House Steiner. The Lyran Commonwealth excels at placing noobs within Assault Mechs.
The reasons for this are threefold:
1) Survivability. Unlike other empires, we in the Lyran Commonwealth value our soldiers. They are our collective sons and daughters, and they are far less expendable than some hunk of metal. We place our mechpilots in the mechs that we think will bring them home safely, and let them gain experience without undue risk of life and limb.
2) Non-Aggression. The Lyran Commonwealth is more concerned with keeping its borders safe than with territorial expansion. We have a defensive combat doctrine, centered around guarding our many industrialized worlds. To that end, an Assault Mech is the finest choice for area denial. Should the situation grow more dire, they are nightmares to face in urban combat. They mesh very well with our objectives.
3) Excessive wealth. The fact is, the Lyran Commonwealth is filthy rich. Everything we touch turns shiny and valuable. What's a House to do with all this wealth? Well, build exotic ice castles on frozen worlds, of course! But after we built a sufficient number of Bond villain igloo palaces, it seemed the next best thing would be to spend it on giant robo-men, so that we could have massive, real-life Rock 'Em Sock 'Em free-for-alls. And, um, defend ourselves.
Edited by revanus, 13 February 2012 - 03:48 PM.
#59
Posted 16 February 2012 - 04:37 PM
#60
Posted 18 February 2012 - 06:57 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users