Quote
-----
The lowering of trade restrictions between the Federated Suns and Lyran Commonwealth would do much to strengthen their respective economies, especially after the Fourth Succession War and War of 3039. The conquest of fresh territory would also help strengthen the business sector as corporations began to expand and grow into these new markets. This led to massive exploitation, such that in 3036 Melissa Steiner-Davion had to step in and put an end to their unfair practices. In the years afterward, most effort went towards strengthening local firms, such as the revival of Asuncion Industries.
Trade with the other Successor States however dropped dramatically in the years following FedCom's formation. Only with the St. Ives Compact and Free Rasalhague Republic was FedCom an active trader, and even the latter felt constrained to keep economic activity with the new superstate at much lower levels for fear of offending the Draconis Combine.
-----
The Armed Forces of the Federated Commonwealth was the combined military of the AFFS and LCAF. By early 3041 AFFC High Command formally accepted control of the two organizations, and by 3042 the last vestiges of both militaries was discarded. By 3050 the AFFC was the largest military organization in the Inner Sphere, with a BattleMech strength of 256 regiments and 1 battalion.
Quote
-----
The modest benefits that the Concord of Kapteyn brought include a relatively low-level technology exchange program, and trade agreements for BattleMechs, research results and similar sensitive items and information.
-----
While it was left outdated by the massive changes that the political landscape underwent after the Fourth Succession War, the Concord of Kapteyn never technically expired, nor was it ever formally canceled by the signatory parties. After the War of 3039 the Draconis Combine supplied Listen-Kill Missile technology (and the countermeasures) to the League and the Confederation in an attempt to rekindle the Concord of Kapteyn.
As stated in Developer Q&A 2, all of the factions will have access to the same equipment, albeit at different prices.
Quote
[BRYAN] No. Prices may vary, but everyone has equal access to items.
Moreover, we know (from the same Q&A) that rank will not affect availability of non-cosmetic items.
Quote
[PAUL] Battlefield and Call of Duty are a different weapon/play mechanic than what makes up MechWarrior. In the two FPS’s mentioned, all weapons are very close in terms of efficiency of poking holes through your opponents. If they give you a “better” gun for being a higher rank, it’s not THAT big of an issue because in the end, a bullet hitting your target is a bullet hitting your target. In MechWarrior, this is not really the case. There are a lot more traits of firing a weapon that you need to pay attention to in order to keep it and you in working condition (heat, weight, weapon type, etc). That being said, we will not be providing weapons or Mechs at higher ranks, but we will provide low to zero impact items such as skins and other visual customizations.
So, what I'm wondering is:
1.) Have the Devs considered implementing these agreements/alliances in MWO, or would they (if they haven't decided to do so already) be open to implementing them if there is sufficient interest from the player base (or, conversely, not implementing them if there was sufficient interest from the player base in that option)?
2.) If implemented, how would/should these agreements affect the prices that any given player pays for 'Mechs and equipment?
Assuming the price for acquiring out-of-House products is always substantially (say, 50%?) greater than that of similar/equivalent in-House products:
- Should FedSuns and Lyran players receive a discount (say, a 15-20% decrease on the base out-of-House price) on equipment ('Mechs, weapons, etc.) produced the others' realm (though, still paying more than they would for the same/equivalent item produced in-House), while paying somewhat more (say, the base out-of-House price) for the same/equivalent item produced by the Republic and substantially more (say, a 25-30% increase on the base out-of-House price) for the same/equivalent item produced by the Combine, the Confederation, or the League?
- Likewise, should Capellan, Draconian, or League players receive a similar discount on equipment produced the others' realms while likewise paying somewhat more for the same/equivalent equipment produced by the Republic and substantially more for the same/equivalent equipment produced by the (Lyran) Commonwealth or the Suns?
- Should Republican players, as members of neither alliance, pay the base out-of-House prices for weapons and equipment produced by the other realms?
- Would/should Mercs and Lone Wolves be entitled to a similar-but-lesser discounts (say, a 5-10% decrease on the base out-of-House price) from their closest affiliation (highest loyalty points), and mark-ups (say, a 20-25% increase on the base out-of-House price) from the others?
A FedSuns player wants to buy a PPC to install on one's 'Mech.
Let's say that the base - and, thus, in-House - price for a PPC is 200,000 c-bills.
With a 50% mark-up, the base out-of-House price for the same PPC would be 300,000 c-bills.
As such, a FedSuns-made PPC would cost this player 200,000 c-bills.
An equivalent Lyran-made PPC would cost this player the 15-20% less than base out-of-House price due to the alliance between the two realms: 240,000 to 255,000 c-bills.
An equivalent Republic-made PPC would cost this player the base out-of-house price: 300,000 c-bills.
An equivalent Combine-made, Confederation-made, or League-made PPC would cost this player 25-30% more than the base out-of-House price due to being a member of one of the realms in the opposing alliance: 375,000 to 390,000 c-bills.
Example 2:
A FRR player wants to buy a new 'Mech - say, a Centurion.
Let's say that the base - and, thus, in-House - price for said Centurion is 3,491,500 c-bills.
With a 50% mark-up, the base out-of-House price for the same Centurion would be 5,237,250 c-bills.
As such, a Republic-made Centurion would cost this player 3,491,500 c-bills.
An equivalent FedSuns-made, Lyran-made, Combine-made, Confederation-made, or League-made Centurion would cost this player the base out-of-house price: 5,237,250 c-bills.
Example 3:
A Capellan player also wants to buy a Centurion.
Let's again say that the base - and, thus, in-House - price for said Centurion is 3,491,500 c-bills.
With a 50% mark-up, the base out-of-House price for the same Centurion would, again, be 5,237,250 c-bills.
As such, a Confederation-made Centurion would cost this player 3,491,500 c-bills.
An equivalent Combine-made or League-made Centurion would cost this player the 15-20% less than base out-of-House price due to the alliance between the three realms: 4,189,800 to 4,451,662.5 c-bills.
An equivalent Republic-made Centurion would cost this player the base out-of-house price: 5,237,250 c-bills.
An equivalent FedSuns-made or Lyran-made Centurion would cost this player 25-30% more than the base out-of-House price due to being a member of one of the realms in the opposing alliance: 6,546,562.5 to 6,808,425 c-bills.
Example 4:
A Merc or Lone Wolf with a fairly-high standing with House Marik also wants to buy a PPC for one's 'Mech.
Let's again say that the base - and, thus, in-House - price for a PPC is 200,000 c-bills.
With a 50% mark-up, the base out-of-House price for the same PPC would be 300,000 c-bills.
As such, a League-made PPC would cost this player 5-10% less than the base out-of-House price: 270,000 to 285,000 c-bills.
An equivalent Combine-made, Confederation-made, FedSuns-made, Lyran-made, or Republic-made PPC would cost this player 20-25% more than the base out-of-House price: 360,000 to 375,000 c-bills.
3.) How should these alliances affect the ability to execute missions/contracts against other powers?
As the FedCom Accords merged the armies of the Federate Sums and the Lyran Commonwealth into a single entity (the Armed Forces of the Federated Commonwealth), it doesn't make much sense for the standing armies (that is, Faction Players) either realm to ever attack the other (outside of an instance of civil war), right?
(Of course, that wouldn't necessarily stop private concerns - corporations and certain individuals, for example - from hiring Mercs and Lone Wolves to execute certain tasks... right?)
By contrast, the Concord of Kapteyn "failed to truly reconcile Houses Marik and Liao, however, who continued to raid each other with deniable mercenary assets".
That sort of statement would seem to indicate that while standing armies (Faction Players) might not typically be used to attack allies, Mercs (and Lone Wolves) might be used for "plausible deniability" purposes.
I think it would add an interesting new dimension (or set of dimensions) to the game.
Your thoughts?