Jump to content

FORUMS

A few trailer nitpicks and my tweak wishlist :)


10 replies to this topic

#1 Fecal

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 242 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:25 AM

Hi guys,

I just saw the trailer and absolutely loved it. I can't believe we're so close to finally having a mech game at our fingertips. I have just one nitpick, and I hope that someone up there is listening :)

Anyhow, when watching the mechs 'die' and fall, I had a couple problems with how it was displayed.

The problem comes down to two primary things: first, I think there needs to be more emphasis on the sheer mass of these mechs. Second, when a mech is 'killed' it appears to immediately ragdoll, which is a complaint I have with most games not using some Euphoria-like engine. More on each point below.

The issue with mass first came to mind when I saw the Jenner get shot down and fall on its face. It just tipped over like no big deal with all that weight on the cockpit. It may be an issue of work involved but I'd expect to see an unpowered mech in an awkward position essentially crumple if it lost power. Or if it's running, since we're dealing with such high speeds (these such large objects) I'd hope there could be some kind of tumbling or sliding involved from a downed mech.

It just doesn't appear heavy when it hits the ground. I'm not sure if that's a matter of adding some effects such as group shake or kicking up dust or maybe some small sparks/explosions indicating the stress on the components colliding with the ground but I think that could use a little more tweaking (although I do realize it's pre-alpha). Environmental damage like carving a crash scar into the ground would also be awesome.

I do hope sound effects will also emphasize the sheer mass of these machines colliding / falling / moving / breaking with all of the stress and groans you'd imagine it'd put on their components.

To my second point, I really hate how most games immediately ragdoll characters after they are killed. In the case of a battlemech, it is such a large and complex mechanism that you'd imagine it would take time for it to completely 'die' after reaching a critical state. For example, when the atlas is destroyed it immediately falls over from the kill shot. You'd imagine that the mech's emergency systems would try to right it in a shutdown position (if damage were not too severe and speed was slow) or it would possibly have some short-circuit effects where the legs lose control or power over a second or two. Imagine a chicken running with its head cut off (but only for a moment)... that kind of thing.

These kinds of things bother me with most games, but I figure since there are developer gods lurking in the forums I hope someone casts an eye this way :) And again, amazing job guys.

#2 wwiiogre

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 1080 posts
  • LocationNorth Idaho

Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:28 AM

yep, imagine they will have this sorted out

chris

#3 Technoviking

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 2135 posts
  • LocationYes

Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:31 AM

Fecal? Really? Terrible name. Just a nitpick.

#4 carl kerensky

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 184 posts
  • LocationMoon Base Alpha

Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:31 AM

Hmmm...good points there. I'm a sim freak and the one thing past titles couldn't nail was expression of heavy mass especially when it comes to falling over. Maybe if they slowed the decent or falling over of a mech to express it. Not sure. Just a thought. Over all I love the way the mechs move. To me they express mass. Hey just watch a good Godzilla movie...there's your movement of heavy mass...

Ck

#5 Damocles

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 973 posts
  • LocationSeattle, WA

Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:31 AM

I just would like to see LRMs travel faster

#6 VeiledMalice

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 132 posts

Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:36 AM

LRMs have always been slow-ish. Gives the person on the receiving end time to dodge. Or, to contemplate their impending demise. :P

#7 Damocles

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 973 posts
  • LocationSeattle, WA

Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:37 AM

Eh they look like someones tossing softballs right now... seeing them coming can be done several different ways. I Think MW3 had a large expulsion of gas at the launcher area to show that they'd been launched.

Or ...ye know paint some red on them

Edited by Damocles, 09 March 2012 - 10:38 AM.


#8 Fecal

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 242 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:38 AM

View PostTechnoviking, on 09 March 2012 - 10:31 AM, said:

Fecal? Really? Terrible name. Just a nitpick.

One should never upset a technoviking. I have made a critical mistake. *have a water bottle, sir*

#9 TheUncle

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 78 posts

Posted 09 March 2012 - 10:44 AM

When licensing the tech Russ said
“Working with CryENGINE is a true pleasure," said Russ Bullock, president of Piranha Games. "It is definitely the best choice for us: Both the character animation pipeline with the procedurally and physics based animations and the destruction system fit our goals perfectly and allow us to develop a truly unique AAA experience based on the award-winning BattleTech Universe."

10 bucks at one point in the future the mech dying animations will be great.

#10 Geist Null

    Member

  • Veteran Founder
  • 1704 posts
  • LocationNE PA USA

Posted 09 March 2012 - 11:04 AM

im sure they will have a multitude of ways a mech will crumple. its only a couple seconds in the frame before they pan away and its hard to tell what killed the mech and why it fell that certain way.

#11 pcunite

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 259 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 12 March 2012 - 06:45 PM

I think that one thing the 2009 trailer did correctly was express mass very well. Everything looked and acted very heavy. Mechs landing on buildings, the way the Atlas backs up after the other goes crit was very tank like. It could have all been perspective and environment though. Naturally, this was an alpha, but the graphics were plain with the mechs not very detailed or metallic looking. Basically, the 2009 trailer was very good! I think this trailer was to show us the game is real, for that I'm very excited.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users