Jump to content

FORUMS

Do you Like the New Raven?


225 replies to this topic

Poll: Do You LIke the New Raven? (484 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you like the new Raven Design?

  1. Yes (387 votes [79.96%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 79.96%

  2. No (59 votes [12.19%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.19%

  3. Don't Care (38 votes [7.85%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.85%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#161 Adridos

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 8849 posts
  • LocationHiding in a cake, left in green city called New A... something.

Posted 27 April 2012 - 04:30 AM

Also, for those stealth - F117 supporters, there are two facts you forgot about.

This mech was designed by a Chinese-Russian state, it should differ from yours dramatically. And also, the modern SCI-FI takes other ways of stealth as the functioning version. This is a proper modern stealth SCI-FI vessel:


Posted Image

What does its shapes remind you of? Yeah, Raven. B)

And this are your sharp shapes you think are stealthy:
Posted Image

Yep, you fail. The shapes of Raptor are usefull only for airplanes, real fighting equipment (like mechs), DOES NOT make use of them! ;)

#162 zzzuk

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 38 posts
  • LocationISN News Flash Breaking [:::]___[:::] News: at morning /(__)\ a patrol unit has (:)=\_ ¤_/=(:) seen the never /)(\ before witnessed [] . . [] strange designed /¥\ . /¥\ 'Mech.

Posted 27 April 2012 - 04:54 AM

View PostAelos03, on 26 April 2012 - 12:39 PM, said:


heheh but i think raven should look like raven not Comanche helicopter :P


It was not meant like that. I wanted to say that the "realistic" style of new Mech designs fits greatly into the Battletech universe, that is known for it´s "realism" without any alien races or teleporters etc. For me the new designs raise the willing suspension of disbelief for MWO - and that is definitely a great achievement.

#163 sssoniccc

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 21 posts
  • LocationUnited States

Posted 27 April 2012 - 10:25 AM

All of the new Battlemech designs have been a winner in my book, including the Raven. :)

#164 MaddMaxx

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 4903 posts
  • LocationNova Scotia, Canada

Posted 27 April 2012 - 10:33 AM

It might be interesting to Hear FD's thoughts on the straightening of the beak though? If for no other reason, it is much easier to manufacture/mass produce and then armor things without multiple curved surfaces... ;)

P.S. The Abrams travels in large groups and they make so much bloody noise that stealth is not really an option...

Edited by MaddMaxx, 27 April 2012 - 10:35 AM.


#165 Burning Chrome

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 100 posts

Posted 27 April 2012 - 10:39 AM

View PostSeDevri, on 26 April 2012 - 12:54 PM, said:


Well i'm not really sure what your complaint here is about? you do realize that many of the Raven's were capture by the FedSuns during the 4th Succession War, and that because of this the FedSuns were able to get the mech into actual production faster than the Capellans so having FedCom colors makes perfect sense to me. Don't bash unless you know what your talking about please.


Allow me to clarify a few things for you.

Wow, in nearly 30-years of playing Battletech, I never realized the Raven could possibly end up outside the CCAF. Thanks!

Since the above statement may also be fuzzy to you, and I'm aware that text does not always properly convey intent or emotion, the above statement hints towards sarcasm.

IMO, as it is an original in-House Capellan design, the Raven probably would have been better served by being in CCAF colors.

The rounded "nose", again IMO, detracts from the otherwise excellent design. A slight "beak-ish" look would have honored the origins of the Raven designs and probably caused less uproar. (Could it be the latest MWO troll to-date? Who knows?)

And, since you know NOTHING of my Battletech knowledge, then perhaps you should take your own advice and "Don't bash unless you know what you are talking about please".

#166 Fetladral

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 460 posts
  • LocationAsgard

Posted 27 April 2012 - 10:52 AM

View PostAdridos, on 27 April 2012 - 04:30 AM, said:

Also, for those stealth - F117 supporters, there are two facts you forgot about.

This mech was designed by a Chinese-Russian state, it should differ from yours dramatically. And also, the modern SCI-FI takes other ways of stealth as the functioning version. This is a proper modern stealth SCI-FI vessel:


Posted Image

What does its shapes remind you of? Yeah, Raven. B)

And this are your sharp shapes you think are stealthy:
Posted Image

Yep, you fail. The shapes of Raptor are usefull only for airplanes, real fighting equipment (like mechs), DOES NOT make use of them! ;)


The only mechs that should use aerodynamics are lights (maybe some mediums) so that they can hit the 130 kph or whatever. heavies and assaults wouldnt matter if they had aerodynamics simply because of mass.

#167 Solis Obscuri

    Don't Care How I Want It Now!

  • Legendary Founder
  • 3767 posts
  • LocationPomme de Terre

Posted 27 April 2012 - 01:37 PM

View PostBurning Chrome, on 27 April 2012 - 10:39 AM, said:

The rounded "nose", again IMO, detracts from the otherwise excellent design. A slight "beak-ish" look would have honored the origins of the Raven designs and probably caused less uproar. (Could it be the latest MWO troll to-date? Who knows?)

Well, here's the "origins of the Raven designs"...
Posted Image
I think FD's design would have to be a lot more rounded and less hooked to get close to that...

#168 Jeremiah Mint

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 64 posts
  • LocationOklahoma

Posted 27 April 2012 - 01:44 PM

View PostAdridos, on 27 April 2012 - 04:30 AM, said:

Also, for those stealth - F117 supporters, there are two facts you forgot about.

This mech was designed by a Chinese-Russian state, it should differ from yours dramatically. And also, the modern SCI-FI takes other ways of stealth as the functioning version. This is a proper modern stealth SCI-FI vessel:


Posted Image

What does its shapes remind you of? Yeah, Raven. B)

And this are your sharp shapes you think are stealthy:
Posted Image

Yep, you fail. The shapes of Raptor are usefull only for airplanes, real fighting equipment (like mechs), DOES NOT make use of them! ;)



Lol really? Methinks it is you who fails sir.

#169 Tritarian

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 43 posts

Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:50 PM

"Nevermore"

Doth quoth the raven

#170 Ramrod AI

    Member

  • Veteran Founder
  • 101 posts

Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:55 PM

To be honest I'm not digging most of the revamped designs. Everything seems too squatty. I wish they would stick with the more traditional look of the mechs (referring to the Battletech Readout: 3050).

#171 EDMW CSN

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 1069 posts
  • LocationOutreach

Posted 28 April 2012 - 01:23 AM

Doesn't matter to me. But I am glad the Cappies got their Iconic e-war mech :)

#172 Adridos

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 8849 posts
  • LocationHiding in a cake, left in green city called New A... something.

Posted 28 April 2012 - 01:32 AM

View PostJeremiah Mint, on 27 April 2012 - 01:44 PM, said:

Lol really? Methinks it is you who fails sir.


We both know really well what did I mean by saying that. ;)

#173 pursang

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1877 posts
  • LocationSurrey BC, Canada

Posted 28 April 2012 - 01:49 AM

Where's the "sort of" option? =\

#174 Cifu

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 348 posts
  • LocationHungary, EU

Posted 28 April 2012 - 01:49 AM

Honestly: No.

I like the new Atlas, the new Hunchback, the new Awesome... but the Raven (and the Catapult) simply won't reach my heart. :S

It's have nothing about the sleek profile of the old Raven. :(

#175 Youngblood

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 600 posts
  • LocationGMT -6

Posted 28 April 2012 - 04:43 AM

I'm a Capellan Citizen and MechWarrior and generally a person with good taste, and I endorse this 'Mech's newly designed beak. It reminds me of the "droop nose" on the Concorde airliner, combined with a world-spanning long-range strategic jet bomber's cockpit viewports.

#176 Dataman

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 324 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationJakarta, ID

Posted 28 April 2012 - 04:52 AM

look less like a bird... more like a canine

but if this thing could do the justice as the classic raven everybody loves, I have no objection

#177 Thorn Hallis

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3848 posts
  • LocationNorth from here

Posted 28 April 2012 - 05:15 AM

View PostSeDevri, on 26 April 2012 - 12:54 PM, said:

Well i'm not really sure what your complaint here is about? you do realize that many of the Raven's were capture by the FedSuns during the 4th Succession War, and that because of this the FedSuns were able to get the mech into actual production faster than the Capellans so having FedCom colors makes perfect sense to me. Don't bash unless you know what your talking about please.


You do realize that the FedSuns never built the Raven, even though they had aquired the blueprints? So yeah....know what you talking about and such...

#178 Aelos03

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1117 posts
  • LocationSerbia

Posted 28 April 2012 - 07:52 AM

View Postzzzuk, on 27 April 2012 - 04:54 AM, said:


It was not meant like that. I wanted to say that the "realistic" style of new Mech designs fits greatly into the Battletech universe, that is known for it´s "realism" without any alien races or teleporters etc. For me the new designs raise the willing suspension of disbelief for MWO - and that is definitely a great achievement.


Old raven model if done with same level of textures and stuff it would look realistic, but what bothers me when i see picture its like i see mech that looks like raven.

#179 bANANAjOE

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 22 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 28 April 2012 - 08:02 AM

Raven looks great!! More like a real machine than all other mechs, thats what I like!! Sure will be one of my favorites!!

#180 infinite xaer0

    Member

  • Elite Founder
  • 371 posts

Posted 28 April 2012 - 08:46 AM

View PostBurning Chrome, on 27 April 2012 - 10:39 AM, said:


The rounded "nose", again IMO, detracts from the otherwise excellent design. A slight "beak-ish" look would have honored the origins of the Raven designs and probably caused less uproar.



lol, uproar? I think at this point, the results of the poll speak for themselves..





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users