Jump to content

FORUMS

Playing as a Clanner


84 replies to this topic

Poll: Clanner. (230 member(s) have cast votes)

Can you enforce honor?

  1. Yes, by specifically choosing players allowed to become Clanners, based on certain criteria. (42 votes [18.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.26%

  2. Yes, by punishing dishonorable play (shooting the rear, ganging up, legging) for the player. (102 votes [44.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.35%

  3. No. You can't make people play a certain way. (86 votes [37.39%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.39%

Should we?

  1. Yes. It is canon. (46 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  2. Yes. For all the pros of joining the Clans, there should be cons aswell. (123 votes [53.48%])

    Percentage of vote: 53.48%

  3. No. We have free will to play as we want. (61 votes [26.52%])

    Percentage of vote: 26.52%

Should matches be intentionally misbalanced?

  1. Clanners are the superior force, so yes. The IS simply has to fight harder. (33 votes [14.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.35%

  2. Yes, in Clanner favour, but IS troops should be rewarded more for winning. (79 votes [34.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 34.35%

  3. No. Maintain balance even at the beginning of the Clan invasion. (77 votes [33.48%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.48%

  4. Yes, in IS favour, since they have a larger population and military. (41 votes [17.83%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.83%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#41 Name54678

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts

Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:49 AM

There should absolutely be a second set of rules for playing a clanner. Kerensky taught the clans how to behave, how to fight, and gave them rules and codes of conduct to follow. You can't be a test-tube baby who's been brainwashed since day one and then go do whatever you want like a freebirth. You could enforce this through penalties and peer pressure.

For example, there's going to be that one player who joins a clan, uses his/her superior techonolgy to fry casuals, newbs, and kids, then goes and brags about what a hardcore bad*ss he/she is. If that person employs tactics not in line with clan dogma, then he/she would be a pariah amongst the clan. They could be penalized by having the costs of their repairs doubled or tripled for dishonoring their clan.

You could also bring peer pressure into play. If you take that dishonorable player along with you into battle, EVERYBODY in your team has their rewards reduced by some percentage (20%?). Now, we all want loot and this person is costing us $$$ so you're not going to take them. When they cant get a match, they'll either have to conform to clan ethics, go back to IS, or just leave outright (no loss on the last option). In order to give them a chance to change, make the penalty decay over time. For example, 20% to start, then -5% every 3 days until zero penalty.

I remember reading somewhere that the clans would sometimes put people into gawd awful mech's and make them duel as a punishment for bad behavior. You could have the techs in the mechlab refuse to repair the miscreant's mech and make them fight in damaged goods.

Edited by Kalyko Jak, 23 May 2012 - 10:43 AM.


#42 Deathbane

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 50 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:19 PM

View PostJaroth Winson, on 23 May 2012 - 07:47 AM, said:

Back up that statement.


Go on sarna, and read the zellbrigen rules. Not one mention of legging.

Ive neither read it in books, or seen it anywhere in official canon.

I think the burden of proof is on those who believe it exists in zellbrigen.

Ive always thought the clans would see it as highly beneficial. Legging a mech is much more efficient. and creates less waste, than completely destroying an asset.

Edited by Deathbane, 23 May 2012 - 03:26 PM.


#43 Jaroth Winson

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1129 posts
  • LocationClan Space

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:28 PM

Oh sorry I thought you meant it was stated as not allowed in zellbrigen. Also try not to use sarna. It has been proven to be inconsistent & erroneous. Get your info from the sourcebooks and/or novels.

#44 Deathbane

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 50 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:32 PM

View PostJaroth Winson, on 23 May 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:

Oh sorry I thought you meant it was stated as not allowed in zellbrigen. Also try not to use sarna. It has been proven to be inconsistent & erroneous. Get your info from the sourcebooks and/or novels.


Laziness on my part :P

But i hope my statement highlights that if its in anyway player enforced, you would see weird things like legging be involved into Zellbrigen. Id rather it was not in at all, in any way, and clan units just did it for the kicks arranged between themselves like we've been doing on MWLL.

Less hassle, more fun for us, and doesnt get in the way of other players playstyles since its privately done.

#45 NagaoftheWards

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 40 posts
  • LocationStalking spheroids on the battlefield

Posted 23 May 2012 - 05:28 PM

i say if u want clans to act like clanners, use a gauge like rpgs showing ones true honor. if a pilot uses IS tactics to beat an opponent, than his honor is tainted by a point system depending on the action, but if he adheres to one0on-ones and honorable targeting than he gets either neutral or bonus honor points. it worked in kotor why not here?

#46 SGT Jarhead

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • LocationFayettville, AR

Posted 24 May 2012 - 01:10 AM

Why is everyone caught up on the honour system?

This is not the tabletop version. Granted that it is fun to role-play, and for those that do more power to you. But the fact of the matter is, it is a VIDEO GAME, and people should be able to play how they want.

Now am i saying that I would want people with a non-tactical mindset? No I wouldnt. But thats the point. I want to be a part of a clan that has tactical battle plans, thinks on the fly, puts together a team of mechs that boost each others strengths as well as covers their weaknesses. All of that honour system one on one stuff is all fine and good, you wont see me back down. But, this game is going to be dominated not by the ones who cry about the honour system, but the ones with a conjoining tactical mindset.

I mean imagine the possible outcomes of each match. We are here to win, and become the badest clan out there. I play domination and for everyone playin against me to fear my clan not to complain about what doesnt follow the honour code or the guidlines of clan lore.

I mean no disrespect to anyone who has an alternate view thats what these forums are for, but this is a COMBAT game and combat tactics are my forte. I look forward to seeing you all on the battlefield.

#47 OfTheDark

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 179 posts
  • LocationOh...you know...

Posted 24 May 2012 - 03:44 AM

^ This

I like the idea of RPing an honor system but when it comes down to it it's about having fun. For some that will be RPing Zellbrigen and for some it won't. I don't feel some people who want to play Clan should be left out because they won't adhere to it because they don't know it or just don't want to play it. Esp. when, as mentioned before, interpertation of Zellbrigen varied quite a bit from Clan to Clan and from time period to time period.

Also: How would you implement it? I can only think it would work rightfully if an outside observer was watching and judging...unlikely to say the least...

#48 Noble

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts

Posted 24 May 2012 - 04:44 AM

View PostSGT Jarhead, on 24 May 2012 - 01:10 AM, said:

Why is everyone caught up on the honour system?

This is not the tabletop version. Granted that it is fun to role-play, and for those that do more power to you. But the fact of the matter is, it is a VIDEO GAME, and people should be able to play how they want.

Now am i saying that I would want people with a non-tactical mindset? No I wouldnt. But thats the point. I want to be a part of a clan that has tactical battle plans, thinks on the fly, puts together a team of mechs that boost each others strengths as well as covers their weaknesses. All of that honour system one on one stuff is all fine and good, you wont see me back down. But, this game is going to be dominated not by the ones who cry about the honour system, but the ones with a conjoining tactical mindset.

I mean imagine the possible outcomes of each match. We are here to win, and become the badest clan out there. I play domination and for everyone playin against me to fear my clan not to complain about what doesnt follow the honour code or the guidlines of clan lore.

I mean no disrespect to anyone who has an alternate view thats what these forums are for, but this is a COMBAT game and combat tactics are my forte. I look forward to seeing you all on the battlefield.


The honor system is another way of balance. Everyone is going to be a clanner and I mean everyone, there will be so few spheroids because they already start off with the technological gap and the younger generation would want a much easier time killing others. Most clanners on this forum are really happy too accept the Innersphere to be easy pickings and not having clan technology ever available too them through salvage or other means(Yes, some other people posted such despite it was salvageable...though figuring out how to put it on your mech may of taken awhile), but when it comes to an honor system most seem to throw it out the window because it finally gives the clanners a disadvantage the Innersphere can apply to them just like lore.

Innersphere really need this advantage, unless all clanners are willing to accept the very expensive costs of Omni-mechs if they were damaged, seeing they were a logistical problem, parts were annoying and expensive to create.

Edited by Noble, 24 May 2012 - 04:47 AM.


#49 Jaroth Winson

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1129 posts
  • LocationClan Space

Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:29 AM

This is going to be a long post, so brace your eyes. You have been warned.

We need to look at this thing holistically. There is honor across the board, then there is honor as relates to the TT game. The same rules cannot be applied for a video game. In principle however, almost everything CAN be translated.

The honor system separates the Clans from the barbarians of the IS. Now as a logical person, I can relate to the IS. The use of mines, vibrabombs etc while unappealing or dishonorable to me is just a way of fighting for the IS. If you are tasked with defending a city & us Clansmen invade, I get that your honor lies in defending the city to the best of your ability with the resources you have available to you. You IS guys have your way of doing things, we have ours. Did we say, "That Kai Allard-Liao is a depsicable *******!" :angry: He did jury rig his mech to explode after all. No we did not. We saw that one warrior facing overwhelming odds defeated an elite force of a superior foe. He is lauded by the Clans. We respect ingenuity, creativity and overall, bravery. Tyra Miraborg got herself lines in the Remembrance.

What the IS (as well as those newcomers) need to understand is, the rules governing how a Clan warrior fights are conditional. To those pretenders who spew nonsense with some imaginary authority as if they know what they are talking about, I am speaking directly to you. (Yes Kay Wolf that means you.)

Bidding is done to reduce the loss of life, equipment, resources as well as garner honor. If you can accomplish the most with the least, you are praised, especially those sub-commanders that bid below the cut-down. However there are conditions.

Posted Image

Clan Wolf Sourcebook - Pg.31

Bidding is conditional on the response of the defenders. Are you going to bid down to a Star of mechs only to end up facing a Battalion?

Quote


In thinking of his life, everything before the invasion seemed faded and unreal like early holodramas and ancient newsreels. The invaders were, in many ways, the most honorable of foes. Again and again, they tried to match their forces to ours so that we would not lose too much face, even in defeat.



Lethal Heritage - Pg.161 possibly this is a pdf & it counts the cover as page 1 so it might be 162 or 163

If you say you have two lances defending the position, we are not going to bid a Trinary of mechs. We work with the information given to us. We will give you a fair fight (or in most cases give you the numerical advantage), if you give us the info. Say nothing & we are within our rights to bring everything to bear on you.

(Argue with the source material Kay), I DARE you)

Clan warriors take pride in aiming at & destroying specific parts of mechs.

Quote


The twin bolts of blue lightning crackled through the air. Both hit the Prometheus' right leg, reducing its armor to virtual vapor. A pulse laser in the Masakari's right arm drilled a series of green bolts into the same limb. That hit ripped away all but the very last bit of armor as far as the computer was concerned. (Pg.34)

Victor shook his head to clear it and found himself hanging from the restraining straps of the command couch. Focusing beyond the holographic display that showed the Masakari getting back to its taloned feet, he saw only blackness through the viewports. His eyes confirmed what gravity had already told him—that his 'Mech had landed face-down in the dirt. With only one leg and my right-side armor breached front and back, there's no way I can continue the fight.

Glancing at the approaching Masakari in the display, he mentally amended that idea. And there's no way Ranna is going to let me continue the fight. I can't even punch out!

Leaving no doubt as to why the BattleMech had ruled warfare since its creation six centuries earlier, the Masakari concentrated all four of its guns on the downed Daishi. Aiming in deliberate and well-practiced moves that showed Victor why the Clans had so easily swept through the Inner Sphere, the Masakari opened the Daishi's back like a coroner doing an autopsy. The PPC bolts fried structural stabilizers while the lasers sliced through ferro-titanium ribs.

The lasers freed the Daishi's fusion engine from its mountings. It dropped down, the safeguards in it snuffing the reaction before it could explode. As if the Masakari had pulled the Daishi's heart out, Victor's 'Mech shuddered once, then all the monitors died, leaving him hanging in a hot, dark cocoon.

The deathly stillness pressed in on him, then he shook his head.The only advantage we ever had in fighting the Clans was that they always played by a rigid set of rules that gave us a tactical edge. If they ever come to embrace the flexibility that Phelan and the others showed here, Ragnar won't be the only Prince of the Inner Sphere sporting a bondcord.



Natural Selection - Pg.35 possibly. this is a pdf & it counts the cover as page 1, so it might 35 or 36 not sure.

What is this? Legging? Shooting a downed mech? And in the back too? We are surgeons not butchers. We aim at specific parts to disable the enemy mech using as little energy & ammo as possible before moving on to another target. We knock you down. If you try to get back up, we give you a knock to keep you down. The only time a Clan warrior tries to kill someone is when there is hate involved, usually because something personal happened. As Victor noted, his mech was damaged in a way where he was simply unable to continue fighting. That is what we do & anyone who says otherwise does not know what they are talking about.

(Argue with the source material Kay, I DARE you)

Oh and for the record, before you even think of thinking about attacking the "flexibility" part, Victor is referring to Phelan's group, using hit & run tactics, as opposed to the common Clansman would would simply stand still & argue that the Inner Sphere freebirth should come out & fight.

Quote


The Flag group had begun to move in the rough direction of the radio transmissions, but things fluctuated too rapidly to be certain they were on the right track. Victor knew that meant the Kell Hounds were involved in a running battle, which should have been good for them. Hit-and-run has been the tactic de jour to use against the Clans. If Phelan's turning it back against us, though, we could be in trouble.



If you only shoot for the CT to make the reactor go critical how would you ever claim isorla & bondsmen? Legging, shooting downed mechs & shooting the rear of a mech is NOT dishonorable. Oh and as for this notion about shooting mechs that have overheated & shut down being dishonorable as well............

Quote


Peri finished the torso drill and Joanna addressed Aidan. "Cadet Aidan. Check your heat scale. Does it show up normal? Respond."

On the intercom, cadets always had to wait for Joanna's order to respond before they could press and hold down the blue button next to the 'Mech throttle and actually speak to her. He had expected the communication restrictions to be relaxed once in a 'Mech, and it surprised him to learn that he could stillnot speak to Joanna or any other officer without permission to respond.

"Heat scale normal." he said and released the button.

As it should be. I tell you to check only to make sure you realize the most important cockpit rule. Never—not in the heat of battle or the excitement of fixing an enemy 'Mech in your sights, lining it up, and using your most skillful assault plan, your best array of weaponry in the fancy blasts and pulses that have become your battlefield specialty—never, never forget that you must be continually conscious of the ribbons of information revealed on the heat-scale gauge. A 'Mech is like a living being; it is like the horse of the cavalry, the camel of the desert warrior. You must continually care for it, not push it too much, not allow it to become overheated.

Just as those animals speeded up the time, and in many ways, expanded the territory over which wars could be conducted, so the BattleMech—and especially the OmniMech—has quickened and enhanced the possibilities of ground warfare. But even with the improved heat-sink technology of the OmniMechs our scientists have provided us, we can still disable our own 'Mech, making it a sitting duck for others, or even get it blown up and ourselves with it, because we get so caught up in being a hero that we forget the patterns of awareness that a 'Mech pilot must maintain at all times. These patterns include the knowledge of your own 'Mech as well as the situation of the fellow warriors of your Star or Star Cluster. This warning is for all of you. Cadet Peri, you understand this, quiaff? Respond."



Way of the Clans - Pg. 43 (again this might not be the exact page as stated above)

At the time Aidan is training, the invasion had not begun which means that Clan warriors will only be fighting Clan warriors. (with the obvious exception of some tainted group or solahma unit being sent after pirates or bandits). If shooting a mech that has shut down due to overheating is dishonorable & that would be the common rule not the exception, why would Joanna mention the "sitting duck" part? Posted Image Would a warrior not say, "Hey it looks like he/she overheated, let me hold on here until they cool down & start back up." Why did Joanna not say "you would be a sitting duck to a dishonorable opponent." Posted Image Because it is stupid & whoever says that does not know what they are talking about. You are in charge of managing your own heat. If you choose to fire off all your lasers & shut down, that is YOUR problem.

(Argue with the source material Kay, I DARE you)

Clan warriors are not only brave but cunning.

Posted Image

The Falcon & The Wolf - Pg.23 (you know the drill by now)

Was that dishonorable? Should Natasha have said, "Hey Falcons, the hot water from this river is masking our heat signatures, so you may not be able to see us. You guys need to come left. No, no. Left. Yes. A little bit more. See me now? No? OK hold on, let me fire off a laser. There. Saw that? Yes? OK we can fight now."

Clan warriors use ambushes. Once the batchall has been completed & the Circle of Equals is stated, it is game on.

(Argue with the source material Kay, I DARE you! Please attempt a rebuttal after you see the work of the writers of the universe in your face with the title & page listed. PLEASE!)

Get it through your head. We fight honorably but there are conditions for everything.

Edited by Jaroth Winson, 01 May 2013 - 05:10 AM.


#50 Andar89

    Member

  • Veteran Founder
  • 650 posts
  • LocationClan Wolf Occupation Zone

Posted 24 May 2012 - 11:43 AM

Hmm waiting for a enemy to cool down, or a fallen enemy to stand up again sounds more like a Kuritan style of fighting.

#51 Taigen

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 151 posts
  • Location3rd rock from the sun

Posted 24 May 2012 - 04:58 PM

Shooting a parked and shut downed mech that is waiting for its turn in a duel outside the circle of equal is frowned upon because that mech is a non combatant. Shooting at that mech breaks the Zell and the fight becomes a free for all.

On the other hand, shooting a silly pilot who shuts down due to failing to manage heat is not dishonorable but encouraged :) . Fail to manage heat = deserves to be shot.

#52 Jaroth Winson

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1129 posts
  • LocationClan Space

Posted 24 May 2012 - 05:18 PM

View PostTaigen, on 24 May 2012 - 04:58 PM, said:

Shooting a parked and shut downed mech that is waiting for its turn in a duel outside the circle of equal is frowned upon because that mech is a non combatant.


Exactly, THAT is what the rule is for.

#53 dal10

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2410 posts
  • Locationsomewhere near a bucket of water and the gates of hell.

Posted 24 May 2012 - 05:23 PM

i vote no clans. cause everyone will rush that way...

rephrase. no people playing clans. not don't make the clans exist.

Edited by dal10, 24 May 2012 - 05:24 PM.


#54 Gremlich Johns

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 2046 posts
  • LocationMaryland, USA

Posted 26 May 2012 - 09:39 AM

View PostZakatak, on 15 May 2012 - 01:58 PM, said:

I ask you 3 questions, all in the polls.

1. Can you enforce honour?
2. Should we enforce honour?
3. How should Clan vs. IS matches play?

While Clanners are superior technologically in every way, they have morals that prevent them from playing to their fullest potential.



Since Zakatak is NOT a clan-oriented player, I make the claim that his poll is null and void. Clansmen care not what a Spheroid thinks about their society. Just saccept them now save yourself (and Us) some grief.

#55 Strum Wealh

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2132 posts
  • LocationPittsburgh, PA

Posted 26 May 2012 - 12:34 PM

View PostGremlich Johns, on 26 May 2012 - 09:39 AM, said:

Since Zakatak is NOT a clan-oriented player, I make the claim that his poll is null and void. Clansmen care not what a Spheroid thinks about their society. Just saccept them now save yourself (and Us) some grief.


Part of the issue is that a lot of the eventual so-called "Clansmen" also don't/won't care about "Clan society" at all, and many that will certainly care less about such things than Zakatak apparently does.

The first wave will be mostly the "power-gamers" that can and will join the Clan faction(s) solely to gain access to more capable 'Mechs and weapons, so that they may "demonstrate their superiority" by "pwning the IS nubs".
Those who do care about who and what the Clans are, rather than being solely concerned what shiny toys they happen to have, will likely be but a few handfuls to their legions.
The second group will be fun to compete against, regardless of the outcome; the first is just frustrating and annoying, as one is no longer fighting "Clansmen" (whose tech advantages were balanced by their societal/cultural aspects), but power-gamers with gear that very few (if any) set ups available to the IS could hope to match.

Then the second wave will come - those who initially chose to side or stay with the IS but eventually tire of being ground down by power-gamers and eventually adopt the "if you can't beat them, join them" mentality.

And, after that, the Clans become not the small, elite, well-equipped fighting force fixated on ritual combat that they should be, but the screaming horde that scoffs at the Clans' very identity in favor of "moar dakka".
And the IS would become barren, populated by only a few of the most resolute die-hards (and the occasional bored Clanner) and unable to be completely taken only because the game wouldn't let the Clanners take Core Worlds.

As a "Spheroid", I would much rather face "Clansmen" that conduct themselves as such than the "i must pwn j00" crowd with access to Clan tech. But that might just be me... :rolleyes:

#56 Kethrus Pryde

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Locationcanada

Posted 26 May 2012 - 01:07 PM

If there is the possibility of being a clanner then I will be doing so. Has nothing to do with the better mechs or weapons. I enjoy the mentality they have in the books. They were the SLDF and left the tainted, poilitical society of the innersphere. I enjoy playing honourably and I am not a power gamer looking to have 100 tonnes of OMGWTFPWNBBQ. I want my Locust II-C or my Summoner and thats about it. I've been playing battletech for nearly 15 years now and I enjoy the fluff surrounding them. Fell in love with the Jade Phoenix trilogy and havn't looked back. You'll see my Vying for the 'Pryde' Bloodname and if there are ranks I'll be Galaxy Commander Kethrus Pryde before you know it.

#57 Gremlich Johns

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 2046 posts
  • LocationMaryland, USA

Posted 26 May 2012 - 01:23 PM

@Strum Wealh, fair enough

<B>

#58 Hexenritter

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 55 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationPlanet Tamar

Posted 26 May 2012 - 02:38 PM

Excellent post Jaroth, and thank you for so eloquently defending and explaining our (The Clans') position. Damn good read.

I agree with Strum's point about power gamers though, we're going to have a serious influx of savashris with neither honour nor team mindset, only interested in the tech advantage.

#59 Jaroth Winson

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1129 posts
  • LocationClan Space

Posted 26 May 2012 - 03:02 PM

View PostHexenritter, on 26 May 2012 - 02:38 PM, said:

Excellent post Jaroth, and thank you for so eloquently defending and explaining our (The Clans') position. Damn good read.



Gratitude, Hexenritter.

Quote

I agree with Strum's point about power gamers though, we're going to have a serious influx of savashris with neither honour nor team mindset, only interested in the tech advantage.


As far as that goes, this is why I say launch the Clans at the same time as the IS. Let both sides get accustomed to how that particular universe works & if it appeals to them. Let the players who want to be Clan understand how the Clans work & that even though you have better training, mechs & tech there are restrictions placed on you. Keep us separate until the invasion then unlock both universes & let the cultures collide. By staying on this path as, as soon as you launch, people are simply starting the countdown to the better tech & there will be a flood of people (who are now confessing their love & loyalty to one "Great House" or another) from the IS over to the Clans.

Edited by Jaroth Winson, 26 May 2012 - 03:03 PM.


#60 Groundpound

    Member

  • Legendary Founder
  • 156 posts

Posted 26 May 2012 - 03:21 PM

View PostThat Guy, on 15 May 2012 - 02:46 PM, said:

being a clanner should mean something, and even getting into the clans needs to be difficult. only the hardcore should play clan, and casuals and munchkins need not apply. playing as a clanner needs to be a cut throat as it would be in the clans, with trials, and getting booted out for poor performance, inactivity, or poor behavior.

dont want to deal with that ****? dont go clan

with great firepower comes great responsibility

Umm your thinking is misguided. I may not be able to devote the time needed to be hardcore but no one will stick to honorable combat like me. Besides with superior numbers for the IS I see eager Innersphere pilots breaking the rules first. The it ends in a free for all... I love how clan players are considered the bad guys in this situation...





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users