Tabletop Miniatures
#1
Posted 07 June 2012 - 09:34 PM
I realize that there may be all sorts of legal issues regarding this, but I'm sure I'm not alone in desiring your excellent looking designs for my game . . . so many great-looking designs, and that Stalker is just . . . well, it's just superb. You've got plenty on your plate too right now, so I'm asking if it's a possibility down the road.
I'm sure others will chime in.
Keep it up.
Cheers.
#2
Posted 07 June 2012 - 09:43 PM
#3
Posted 07 June 2012 - 09:46 PM
#5
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:08 PM
#6
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:11 PM
#7
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:11 PM
Edited by Skylarr, 07 June 2012 - 10:12 PM.
#8
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:48 PM
Quote
I doubt it since they don't make Minis, never know they might do a PDF TRO MWO (hows that for acronym chain). Iron wind metals... they would want to see a ROI, and are usually behind anyway.
#9
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:54 PM
Titan II, Warlord, Thunderbolt II and what a crap they made of?
My new Barghest 4T is acceptable but nothing special - nothing in compare with the old RalPartha Thunderbolt Reseen, Bargehest 1T, Catapult
#10
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:56 PM
Ian, on 07 June 2012 - 10:48 PM, said:
I doubt it since they don't make Minis, never know they might do a PDF TRO MWO (hows that for acronym chain). Iron wind metals... they would want to see a ROI, and are usually behind anyway.
There are already TROs out of the common mechs and there variants. If you want one with every posible configuation that that can be put together via their MechLab that book would be one really BIG book.
#11
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:59 PM
So they dont look exacty like the concept for MWO, I dont think there are going to be molding any. Maybe but not for awile, I remember finding
minitures I remember playing in MW4 Mercs, but it wasent for awile.
Edited by OARoyFokker, 07 June 2012 - 11:00 PM.
#12
Posted 07 June 2012 - 11:00 PM
but that means more painting ,,,god i hate painting
Edited by Hairlok, 07 June 2012 - 11:00 PM.
#13
Posted 07 June 2012 - 11:02 PM
#14
Posted 07 June 2012 - 11:49 PM
So not TT size, but still cool if done well.
#15
Posted 08 June 2012 - 07:23 AM
Skylarr, on 07 June 2012 - 10:11 PM, said:
That's why "business people" do these things called "partnerships." Is this trolling?
Catalyst links to MW:O on their links page; ever wonder why? Synergy (oh yeah, synergy) is good for business.
I read IP license contracts all day long, you know, for a living.
You did read the bit about "possible legal issues" in the initial post? I didn't ask them to pirate Battletech; I asked them if a future partnership might not be beneficial to all parties. You might imagine that MW:O is actually good for tabletop, or that a new line of excellent "MW:O edition" minis coming out of an established house might be profitable for everyone.
In this case, there's a marketing opportunity for three different parties: PGI; Catalyst; and Iron Wind Metals. It could be beneficial to these parties and to those of us who might be interested in purchasing the product of the partnership.
Edited by Major Bill Curtis, 08 June 2012 - 07:41 AM.
#16
Posted 08 June 2012 - 07:26 AM
#17
Posted 08 June 2012 - 07:38 AM
BadWolf, on 08 June 2012 - 07:26 AM, said:
Now that is interesting. There's an angle I hadn't even considered, thus a public forum, not a PM.
Also, to all you guys who are mentioning that minis already exist for these 'mechs, you understand that I linked to Iron Wind Metals in my first post, right? I might have considered this, yes? You do know that many of those minis currently available have gone through several "resculpts," several editions?
Does anyone out there actually prefer "Blimpie," their good old TT Stalker, to the design PGI just put out?
I'm looking for interest here, and interesting ideas, like what BadWolf just brought up, not for people who pretend they're lawyers or have silly worries, such as that their game won't come out on time because of a suggested future tertiary project.
Edited by Major Bill Curtis, 08 June 2012 - 07:40 AM.
#18
Posted 08 June 2012 - 07:45 AM
Thomas Hogarth, on 07 June 2012 - 11:02 PM, said:
i hate paper work
#19
Posted 08 June 2012 - 07:56 AM
#20
Posted 08 June 2012 - 08:02 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users