#21
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:23 AM
Its impressive specs are icing on the cake.
#22
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:24 AM
#23
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:24 AM
Bit slow for my tastes but we already have a fast striking Heavy, and this is certainly a very different type of Heavy mech than either the Dragon or Catapult. The Cataphract seems also generic and undefined in contrast, but it certainly rounds out the selection.
Jump-jet mech with 11 tons of armor and can mount a ballistic weapon to the right arm? Hello right arm gauss rifle!
Is there a standard callsign for the Cataphract that doesn't overlap with saying 'catapult'? c-phract?
Edited by Redshift2k5, 23 May 2012 - 09:26 AM.
#24
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:25 AM
#25
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:25 AM
But this mech is powerful and now looks good but it isnt the black knight
#26
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:26 AM
#27
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:26 AM
Don't think I have ever really liked the Cataphract, but I'm going to start looking into it now.
#29
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:27 AM
#30
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:27 AM
#31
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:28 AM
#32
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:28 AM
Now this is here I am pretty sure the Orion won't be for a while.
Did we say 3 mechs of each class before launch? so the only one missing is the final assault class next month for which I am going to guess Cyclops.
#33
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:28 AM
#34
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:29 AM
Redshift2k5, on 23 May 2012 - 09:24 AM, said:
Bit slow for my tastes but we already have a fast striking Heavy, and this is certainly a very different type of Heavy mech than either the Dragon or Catapult. The Cataphract seems also generic and undefined in contrast, but it certainly rounds out the selection.
Jump-jet mech with 11 tons of armor and can mount a ballistic weapon to the right arm? Hello right arm gauss rifle!
Is there a standard callsign for the Cataphract that doesn't overlap with saying 'catapult'? c-phract?
Phract seems to work.
#35
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:29 AM
Especially the anti-Dragoons paint on the arm! I sorta figured it would be Waco's people and the leg confirmed that.
#36
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:29 AM
neodym, on 23 May 2012 - 09:26 AM, said:
I believe thats LBX 10
There is a Varient with a Gauss though...
Quote
Pure sex.
Edited by Kittygrinder, 23 May 2012 - 09:30 AM.
#37
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:29 AM
#38
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:29 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














