8834 replies to this topic

[Sporkosophy]

[Samaritan]

Hon. Seasambot;

Is that your own ink work over erased charcoal sketching, or did you draw the image freestyle in one contiginous go
'
In any case that is more than good enough to put through the GIMP blinder and come out with some great original work.

Respectfully

Samaritan

[Sesambrot]

Aresye, on 08 July 2012 - 07:03 AM, said:

Well, for some constructive criticism.

The back of the neck should curve into the back, vs 2 separate lines.

The hooves themselves should be fairly wide at the bottom, vs the same size as the legs all the way down.

The crease on the back leg should be coming from the stomache/body line, vs the thigh line, at that particular angle.

Other than that, I've got nothing.

Thanks for the feedback! I'm currently looking at a few more pics for reference and am going to change a few things accordingly.
It is surprisingly hard to find good pictures of colts in the show. Probably not that surprising though, considered the low amount of screen-time they usually get...

Samaritan, on 08 July 2012 - 07:12 AM, said:

Hon. Seasambot;

Is that your own ink work over erased charcoal sketching, or did you draw the image freestyle in one contiginous go
'
In any case that is more than good enough to put through the GIMP blinder and come out with some great original work.

Respectfully

Samaritan

I actually used the tutorials Aresye linked some time ago, and drew that in Photoshop using my graphics-tablet.
There are quite a few background-layers that I used for the general shape and proportions...

I hope I'll be able to draw such pictures a bit faster once I'm done with this one, because I'm trying a lot of different things in order to get this one right, trying to learn how to effectively use the tools provided by PS. I have quite a few ideas for pictures I wanna do once I have finalized this OC, until then I can use all the feedback I get, because I'm still pretty much learning how to properly use PS in the first place.

[SNobleJr]

To Samaritan:

Yes, I'm aware that some people may not want to see homosexual content in fiction they peruse (even some who otherwise support LGBT rights, for the simple reason that seeing it in "action" doesn't interest them). I merely meant that listing it under "dark" themes unintentionally gave it more insulting implications than a differently-worded warning would have.

As for your religious arguments, let's just say that I couldn't disagree any more strongly with most of them, and leave it at that. I've already ripped into a condescending jerk recently, I don't want to start a religion vs. non-religion argument with a well-intentioned believer, too.

Fryulator, on 08 July 2012 - 12:45 AM, said:

The first 10 or so chapters felt like a chore slogging through them tbh, but after that, the author really seems to have found his writing legs and it takes off really well. I say do yourself a favor and read it anyways, even if you spoiled plot points. The writing itself is very fun (after the aforementioned chapters, that is). Especially the parts where she earns her "Queen Whiskey" reputation

Well, I left out that I actually kept it on my to-read list, and may start it again if I happen to run out of other fics I'm interested in. Thanks for the clarified recommendation, I'll keep it in mind.

[Watchit]

Johannes Falkner, on 07 July 2012 - 11:59 PM, said:

Personally, I would put Applejack out to pasture and bring in Applebloom as a foster sister of the re-mane-ing 5.

Brilliant!!! The puns have been doubled!

[Samaritan]

Hon. SNobleJr;

Thank you for the clarification and the consideration you displayed in your reply. I do not doubt that you, and many others, have dealt with the legalistic asceticism of moral degeneracy among the religiously motivated. A relationship with one's Creator should never be religious in nature. Religions porport to delineate the moral taboos and relative good one must adhere to in order to satisfy the standards of God. It is little wonder then that most adherants treat God like a Genie of the Lamp. Religion defines the parameters for making God a slave to one's lust for approbation. I can hardly fault a person for being offended by the childish and legalistic self righteousness expressed from this point of view.

I am not a religious man.

I am a Christian, and it saddens me to see so many claim the title in the practice of religion.

In recognition of the manfully stoic manner in which you have replied to my post, I present to you the Lil' Mcintosh "Straight Shooter" award for pony excellence.



Carefull now, that gun has some kick to it.

Respectfully

Samaritan

Edited by Samaritan, 08 July 2012 - 11:33 AM.

[Samaritan]

Hon. Watchit;

When rejoicing in the proliferation of pony punishment, it is traditional to use...

THE ROYAL CANTERLOT VOICE IN THE THIRD PERSON AS WE HAVE DEMONSTRATED HERE!




Respectfully

Samaritan

[Proxus571]

Jade Kitsune, on 07 July 2012 - 11:34 PM, said:

Dash... she's the only one that's really out of place in my opinion. I love Dashie, but she's the one of the mane 6 I'd be fine without.

RD is far too awesome to replace. You should feel ashamed of yourself. Why do I have a feeling this all goes back to the sexuality discussion...

Johannes Falkner, on 07 July 2012 - 11:59 PM, said:

I find it kind of funny that RD is the popular one to off. Though maybe it's just because nobody wants to have their car in ponyville and find the pegasus load on it right after washing. Just imagine torquing off Cloudsdale...

Personally, I would put Applejack out to pasture and bring in Applebloom as a foster sister of the re-mane-ing 5. Kind of like Sisterhooves Social with AJ and Sweetie Belle. Basically, I do not see a large story pool for AJ that cannot be easily transferred to the others. Business problems can affect Rarity and indirectly get Pinkie Pie via the Cakes. Sweetie Belle and Rarity already have some sister-sister dynamics that could be explored. Bringing in Applebloom keeps Granny and Big Mac in cicrculation and can bring more focus to the CMC for further development.

I would actually keep Rainbow for the simple reason that she is the counterbalance to Fluttershy. Also, if we off RD, what reason would we ever have to go to Cloudsdale? Fluttershy won't go there without a REALLY good reason, so you effectively eliminate 1/3 of Equestria from the show by getting rid of RD. Also, how many of Fluttershy's appearances are directly related to or caused by RD stories? Without RD, do you lose reasons to see Fluttershy?

Unacceptable as well. There is only one correct answer to this question and AJ finds your lack of faith disturbing. AJ replaced by applebloom lol... surely you jest...

I find it rather interesting that everyone's first instinct is to remove loyalty first followed by honesty...

[Jade Kitsune]

When it comes right down to it, the cast wouldn't feel right to remove ANY of them, but if I had to pick... well my pick still stands.

Let us hope we never have to actually make the choice.

[CandidAstrius]

when faced with this choice, i think i took a different approach then the rest of you, i decide who i would want to go, i decided based on which of them would want to go, and the only two that want to go rainbow dash and rarity, would you tell RD 'sorry you can't join the wonderbolts because i wouldn't be able to keep all your awesome to my self that way? i think not. or i know it's been you life long dream to be a famous designer, but unfortunately that would cut way to much into your contractually obligated hijinks and there for must not be allowed. as to who i would have replace one or the other....

[Sporkosophy]

Samaritan, on 08 July 2012 - 11:00 AM, said:

Thank you for the clarification and the consideration you displayed in your reply. I do not doubt that you, and many others, have dealt with the legalistic asceticism of moral degeneracy among the religiously motivated. A relationship with one's Creator should never be religious in nature. Religions porport to delineate the moral taboos and relative good one must adhere to in order to satisfy the standards of God. It is little wonder then that most adherants treat God like a Genie of the Lamp. Religion defines the parameters for making God a slave to one's lust for approbation. I can hardly fault a person for being offended by the childish and legalistic self righteousness expressed from this point of view.

I am not a religious man.

I am a Christian, and it saddens me to see so many claim the title in the practice of religion.

Removed the non-relevant parts. But, no. You can't go changing the definition of words simply to suit your purposes. It muddies the waters and serves no purpose but to create an instance of the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.

[CandidAstrius]

Proxus571, on 08 July 2012 - 12:01 PM, said:

RD is far too awesome to replace. You should feel ashamed of yourself. Why do I have a feeling this all goes back to the sexuality discussion...

Unacceptable as well. There is only one correct answer to this question and AJ finds your lack of faith disturbing. AJ replaced by applebloom lol... surely you jest...

I find it rather interesting that everyone's first instinct is to remove loyalty first followed by honesty...

I didn't notice if you had a post where you offered up an alternative, bottom line is, i don't want to see any of them go either, but it's like the saying goes,
"nobody wants to enjoy clubbing baby penguin, but, if you have to club baby penguins, you might as well enjoy it..."

Edited by CandidAstrius, 08 July 2012 - 02:54 PM.

[Arisaema]

Quite frankly this topic has become quite terrifying. The only reason I can see Pony liveries not being allowed is if Hasbro goes all Harmony Gold on these folk. They may not want their IP being associated with the game. Even if it may be considered fair use.


But hey...keep it up. The zoidpony was interesting.

[Samaritan]

Hon. Sporkosophy;

Thank you for the clarification. I am aware of the common missuse of the word religion. If you will look carefully into the religions of the world you will find a single unifying theme... What must a man do to become righteous enough to fellowship with God forever? They then go on to quantify this as best they can in as much of a righteous manner as possible for depraved men. The central theme is that man, by man's efforts can earn the approbation of God.

Orthodox Christianity teaches that God, by God's efforts made a rapproachment with fallen man possible by the work of Christ on the Cross dying for the sins of the world, and that by faith in the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ on our behalf do we free the integrity of God to save us. Faith is a non meritorious system of perception, the object of faith bears the merit.

So as I said, I do nothing to earn the approbation of God, and so I am not religious. In Orthodox Christian Theology the sins of men are paid for. The unbeliever is arraigned before the Great White Throne Judgement Seat and his record of Good Works are examined. From this investigation of his relative good works, which in his unbelief he held to be superior to the work of Christ on his behalf, he is found to have not met the standards of God for eternal life in polite society for ever. If you are going to live with God forever, then you have to be as good as he is. Refusing to acknowledge the person and work of Jesus Christ is refusing the rehabilitation of the imputation of God's Righteousness.

There is more to it, and I will happilly send anyone who asks the Isogogic, categorical, and exegetical treatsies on the integrity of God as deliniated in the original languages and cultural idioms of the Bible.

I appreciate your holding me accountable to keeping the vocabulary straight Sporkosophy. The mind set that would achieve an objective at any cost using ends justifying the means existential philosophy is indeed a dirty rotten propaganda trick and anyone using it should be called out on it. Thanks again sir. It has been a priviledge to have shared these concepts with you.

Respectfully

Samaritan


MLP FIM is an alegorical story that attempts to define and promote the virtues necessary to a stable polite society. The virtues of morality and establishment are for the believer and the unbeliever, but even they can not eliminate elements of sin within the show, nor in the real world. The Angelic Conflict is driven by the assertion that harmony for a thousand years or so can be obtained by means other than those set forth by God. That God's judgement of the Fallen Angels is unjust because a loving God should not barbeque his kids. Human history is the vindication of God's integrity by showing that the fallen can niether accomplish a harmonious society, nor show in the slieghtest manner any injustice on God's part. This is one of the reasons I like the show. It promotes civic and moral virtues without resorting to vulgarities.


Respectfully

Samaritan

Edited by Samaritan, 08 July 2012 - 03:28 PM.

[Proxus571]

CandidAstrius, on 08 July 2012 - 02:54 PM, said:

I didn't notice if you had a post where you offered up an alternative, bottom line is, i don't want to see any of them go either, but it's like the saying goes,
"nobody wants to enjoy clubbing baby penguin, but, if you have to club baby penguins, you might as well enjoy it..."

CandidAstrius, on 08 July 2012 - 02:54 PM, said:

I didn't notice if you had a post where you offered up an alternative, bottom line is, i don't want to see any of them go either, but it's like the saying goes,
"nobody wants to enjoy clubbing baby penguin, but, if you have to club baby penguins, you might as well enjoy it..."

My answer was more in between the lines of my argument...

Quite simply, there is no MLP:FIM without the Mane 6.

To think otherwise... well...

[Samaritan]

Hon. Candidastrius;

That is a great pic for your reply, but please tell me you did not mean to imply that Fluttershy would be using her "Stare" to enjoy clubing seals.

Avoiding Her Stare

Samaritan

[Samaritan]

Hon. Mechwarriors;

Pony threads are awesome!

I am lying in bed hoping my diabetic kidneys will let me keep my feet. I am reading the Bible, listening to an Octavian inspired orchestral piece, and enjoying a civil discourse on the meaning of life with great people.

WooHooo!

and some pony fer yer trouble, Ah'm with Proxus571 on this one.



Respectfully

Samaritan

Edited by Samaritan, 08 July 2012 - 03:31 PM.

[CandidAstrius]

Samaritan, on 08 July 2012 - 03:13 PM, said:

Hon. Candidastrius;

That is a great pic for your reply, but please tell me you did not mean to imply that Fluttershy would be using her "Stare" to enjoy clubing seals.

Avoiding Her Stare

Samaritan

As humorous as i find the concept, no, fluttershy has show time and again, that she lacks the discipline to do something that unpleasant to a small critter, even when 'culling' would be more humane then starvation...

Proxus571, on 08 July 2012 - 03:13 PM, said:

My answer was more in between the lines of my argument...

Quite simply, there is no MLP:FIM without the Mane 6.

To think otherwise... well...

And i have no disagreements with you on that fact, but i doubt Hasbro is lurking this forum for plot idea so its safe enough to speculate to our hearts content ,and...the sacrifice of one to save the rest is a common concept, this version is far more G rated too, and to rally against someone making the choice, with out offering an alternative...well, i guess that a choice of none over one is a choice too.

[wanderer]

Souske Sagara, on 08 July 2012 - 01:44 AM, said:

I say Rarity and Sweetie Belle get in an industrial accident, and most of Belle is replaced by cyberneightics, making Sweetie Bot canon.

Will...I dream?



Or perhaps something more retro.

Edited by wanderer, 08 July 2012 - 04:07 PM.

[Sporkosophy]

Quote

So as I said, I do nothing to earn the approbation of God, and so I am not religious.

This had nothing to do with what I brought up, read here: http://dictionary.re...e/religious?s=t. Buddhism is a religion, and by no means necessitates any sort of deistic figure, yet there are still religious Buddhists. You're ignoring that your beliefs are still derived from a religion, which by definition makes them religious. This isn't a discussion or debate, that's precisely that the words mean. You cannot freely alter the meaning of a word to suit your own gains.

Quote

I appreciate your holding me accountable to keeping the vocabulary straight Sporkosophy. The mind set that would achieve an objective at any cost using ends justifying the means existential philosophy is indeed a dirty rotten propaganda trick and anyone using it should be called out on it.

Then you should stop being guilty of it and take such to a thread more appropriate for said topic. I'm not here to discuss religion, nor do I see why anyone else would be. Had it a bearing on the topic of pony, I would understand, but it doesn't.