Jump to content

ShadowVFX

Member Since 31 Oct 2011
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 10:55 PM
-----

Topics I've Started

What Is The Easiest Way To Find An Equipped Engine?

02 April 2014 - 11:07 AM

I wanted to try to put an 300 XL on my Cicada. I have about 35 mechs of all sizes. I think I have a 300 XL, but I have no clue what mech it might be on. Is there a way for me to find out if I have this engine equipped on a mech without having to go to the mech details for each and every mech, one by one?

Yay For Statistical Probability

02 April 2014 - 09:21 AM

I got the feeling I had played a LOT of Terra Therma since the stat reset...I guess I wasn't wrong. Just look at that distribution. Terra and Crimson are almost double the next most common map and almost 4x more common than most of the other maps.

They don't still have these maps seeded more heavily than the others, do they!?

Posted Image

Matchmaker Is Working As Intended

08 March 2014 - 08:57 PM

If this post isn't about "gameplay balance" (or lack there of), than I don't know what is.

Posted Image

910 tons vs 640 tons.

I'm glad to see matchmaker is working flawlessly.

So, A Victor, A Catapult And A Locust Walk Into The Base

07 March 2014 - 11:54 AM

And they get destroyed by the turrets.


Posted Image

Is Artemis Worth Taking Or Not?

20 February 2014 - 02:51 PM

I try to put at least one or two LRM-10's on most of my mechs with missile hardpoints. I usually don't put more than 30 total LRMs on a mech unless it is a specialized missile boat. With that said, I've used Art IV and I can't say I notice a huge difference in damage delivered to target than without. And when I factor in the cost of the Art IV upgrade + the cost of 1 extra ton and crit per launcher, the benefit just doesn't seem to be there for me. I'd much rather have a few extra heatsinks, more ammo, or even BAP or TAG instead.

What are your thoughts on Artemis IV? When is it good to take it and when is it not?