Just wondering if it makes a difference group cluster-wise. Anyone out there tried it? Is it worthless or is it worth getting? Currently using IS LB 10 X. I'm hoping it gives it a tighter group. If not, then I'm not wasting CB's on it since it's ideal for close range.
0
Is Lb-X Range 5 Worth It?
Started by Wootin87, Dec 26 2014 01:25 AM
3 replies to this topic
#2
-
-
- Littlest Helper
- 29,240 posts
Member
- Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad
Posted 26 December 2014 - 01:39 AM
Short answer is no.
Long answer:
Increasing range does not reduce the spread.
The MG is the best example of this, but it has a COF. Increasing range only makes the MGs far more inaccurate.
Increasing the range on the LBX5 does not really make it any better.. if anything it is arguably the most useless functionality for spread weapons.
Long answer:
Increasing range does not reduce the spread.
The MG is the best example of this, but it has a COF. Increasing range only makes the MGs far more inaccurate.
Increasing the range on the LBX5 does not really make it any better.. if anything it is arguably the most useless functionality for spread weapons.
Edited by Deathlike, 26 December 2014 - 01:39 AM.
#3
-
-
- Little Helper
- 3,854 posts
Member
Posted 26 December 2014 - 01:46 AM
No, it's effective range (where all projectiles hit one component) is 100m.
Edited by kapusta11, 26 December 2014 - 01:46 AM.
#4
-
-
- Fire
- 1,565 posts
Member
Posted 26 December 2014 - 01:54 AM
LBX already has a huge range for its spread. No.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
