Need some extra weight from my missile hard point to upgrade my engine.
What would fill this spot best?
1x SRM6 w/ Artemis FCS or 2x SRM4?
This is an otherwise stock Centurion CN9-D. I'm only upgrading gradually as I play matches. I honestly like the stock setup but I really need that extra speed more than the LRM10.
Thank you.
0
1X Srm6 W/ Artemis Or 2X Srm4?
Started by Fherot, Mar 27 2013 10:04 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:04 AM
#2
Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:12 AM
Are you staying with an XL or going Standard? I assume XL, but asking to be sure.
And are you staying with the LB 10-X?
And are you staying with the LB 10-X?
#3
Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:16 AM
Two SRM4s are better.
When your right torso is exposed, the damage would be spread between both launchers instead of 1.
I don't think the ammo consumption at this point would be an issue.
When your right torso is exposed, the damage would be spread between both launchers instead of 1.
I don't think the ammo consumption at this point would be an issue.
#4
Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:18 AM
Standard engine, sticking to the AC10.
I have an alternate B I'm going to try as well but both work around the AC10 which I love.
Edit: good point about two launchers splitting the damage taken, I didn't think of that.
I have an alternate B I'm going to try as well but both work around the AC10 which I love.
Edit: good point about two launchers splitting the damage taken, I didn't think of that.
Edited by Fherot, 27 March 2013 - 10:24 AM.
#6
Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:54 AM
I love my AC10, and I couldn't bring myself to have a centurion without a big ballistic... I know stats wise more missiles may be better but I have more fun with a big gun and I'm getting pretty good with free-look aiming it.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users