Dmg/match On Most Played 'mech
#121
Posted 06 April 2013 - 04:44 AM
#122
Posted 06 April 2013 - 04:52 AM
#123
Posted 06 April 2013 - 05:37 AM
I appreciate you trying to reason with Mr. AI, however vain those tries are. His intelligence is, after all, artificial.
You guys are arguing with someone who has a hybris mentality, someone who believes in deus ex machina. He is so in love and entangled in his own modus operandi and all its glory, effectiveness and general greatness that he will never admit to being wrong or that what he is arguing is not viable. He thinks that if he maintains cold hard logic he can never be wrong. He feels so vastly superior to everyone else as he puts more time in constructing logical thoughts, that he *cannot* be wrong. Now, I can't speak of xhrit himself but most people I've met that discuss with similar discourse have also been narcissistic and delusional from which these aforementioned properties stem from. This also leads to the fact that you cannot discuss with them. Whether Xhrit is totally OK and just being a keyboard warrior, or not OK doesn't matter; what matters is that you don't continue this kind of discussion too long to get the thread locked.
I created this thread to talk about damage/match, just to see the general level of damage, which I must add was a lot higher than I expected, even though the sample is small and biased. Thanks go to all who voted. Now continue on those rails, please.
#124
Posted 06 April 2013 - 05:53 AM
I'm playing a Hunchback btw.
#125
Posted 06 April 2013 - 06:04 AM
Anyone with a 2 kills per match average or close to it be giving no ***** about that.
#126
Posted 06 April 2013 - 06:07 AM
Edited by Demonic, 06 April 2013 - 06:10 AM.
#127
Posted 06 April 2013 - 06:08 AM
Thontor, on 06 April 2013 - 05:40 AM, said:
True, I hadn't really checked to see if the xp was raw or after bonuses.
As for savior bonus, I think it does reflect a contribution to your effectiveness, but perhaps a little more than it should. So there really isn't a good way to measure with the current stats I guess.
#128
Posted 06 April 2013 - 07:18 AM
3 srm 6
lb10xAC
Will upload when i go home for the summer *college*
#129
Posted 06 April 2013 - 07:30 AM
#130
Posted 06 April 2013 - 07:40 AM
xhrit, on 06 April 2013 - 04:08 AM, said:
Then you're acting belief without evidence. That's fine as long as you keep it as a belief rather than state it as an objective fact. If you want evidence, I suggest you work on figuring out what causes radioactive decay, since no modern method or instrument has detected its cause (...unless someone figured it out or created a Universal Wave Function and I just haven't heard?). You can BELIEVE there is a cause and we just don't know it yet, but that doesn't make it a FACT that there is a cause. Take some basic science classes along with your math, bro...DO YOU EVEN LIFT?
Belief and intuition are fine if they're driving your further investigation...creating a hypothesis. Otherwise, you might as well start a religion. It's fine to discuss determinism as a concept for analyzing and explaining the universe, but it's far from fact or even scientific theory.
Quote
Meh, I doubt it'll get locked for having a philosophy discussion. That said, I'm done. Arguing with dogmatic people is so boring.
#131
Posted 06 April 2013 - 02:56 PM
Nonsense, on 06 April 2013 - 07:40 AM, said:
The entire foundation of science is that everything in the universe can be measured, and that nothing is unknowable.
Reductionist thinking and methods form the basis for many of the well-developed areas of modern science, including much of physics, chemistry and cell biology. Classical mechanics in particular is seen as a reductionist framework, and statistical mechanics can be viewed as a reconciliation of macroscopic thermodynamic laws.
Causality is not a scientific theory, it is science itself.
Edited by xhrit, 06 April 2013 - 03:06 PM.
#132
Posted 07 April 2013 - 08:51 AM
#133
Posted 07 April 2013 - 08:58 AM
#134
Posted 07 April 2013 - 11:13 AM
#135
Posted 07 April 2013 - 02:07 PM
04:34:42
216 per.
ERPPC variety.
#136
Posted 07 April 2013 - 02:23 PM
#137
Posted 11 April 2013 - 10:29 AM
Edited by Demonic, 11 April 2013 - 10:30 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users





















