Dalziel Hasek Davion, on 19 May 2013 - 02:13 AM, said:
I might disagree on aiming for the legs, rather than the rear. My Stalker has 72 armour on the legs and carries no ammo there. Even with an alpha of 20 (moderately-armed light), my light will not punch it quick enough - and will not destroy it. However, rear side torso armour is often scaled compared to head armour, few assault 'Mechs carry much more than 18 armour in the side torso rear - and my 'puny' 20 damage alpha can often penetrate in one hit, if I'm good and he's occupied.
I am nervous of ducking in and out of brawling assaults given the papier-mache that covers my 'Mech. Assaults do, often, aim for the Light 'Mech because killing an 'ankle biter' in one alpha is hugely rewarding, and can remove a lots of guns and aggravation from a brawl quicker than taking an assaults torso armour away and hoping for a crit. Your assertion that people shoot the assault and not the light is not backed up by my experience - and that gives me pause when I'm piloting a light. As does the risk of shooting the friendly assault in the rear - and what that pilot might do if he considers this 'not an accident'.
So - I think both sides of the arguments have merit and your original point - which was "think about whether shooting them in the front would be more effective use of your time" is a good one. All that is required from light pilots is being more aware and smarter than a brawling assault pilot needs to be.
I totally agree with this man. It's one of the better said posts I've seen in a while. Kudos for bringing some focus.