Announcing The Ac40 Jager Pilot Support Group
#41
Posted 21 June 2013 - 01:32 AM
#43
Posted 21 June 2013 - 02:42 AM
I might just let him live
#44
Posted 22 June 2013 - 06:19 AM
Looks like things are going to get worse before they get better :-(
#45
Posted 22 June 2013 - 06:58 AM
And trust me, the dawn is coming!
#46
Posted 29 June 2013 - 04:43 AM
If the foe uses cheese, I'll bring in my own zesty gorgonzola, even if it stinks. Because winning is fun, losing is a waste of my precious free time.
#47
Posted 29 June 2013 - 07:12 AM
Battlecruiser, on 19 June 2013 - 01:01 PM, said:
Sorry, I'm not a delusional person who has to trick myself into thinking "OH THEY KILLED ME THEY'RE BAD I FEEL SORRY FOR THEM" so that i can escape both the reality of the situation as well as my own lack of ability and/or equipment.
you're calling them bad, and feeling "sorry" for them so you can continue to justify using a losing configuration, so you can justify not changing, because you're not only delusional, but you're also selfish, and you will sacrifice winning if it means pleasing your own ego and perpetuating the delusion that you're actually a winner, despite losing. If you do not abide by the rules set in stone within the reality you play, if you do not do everything you can to win within those rules, including forcing them to bend on occasion, then you're just meat in front of the grinder. The inflexible do not survive.
I didn't realize an AC40 build was a "winning configuration" either, its quite frankly supreme garbage against any semi coordinated team. Although it does seem to be problematic against lower end pug games
Edited by Rasako, 29 June 2013 - 07:14 AM.
#48
Posted 29 June 2013 - 08:25 AM
#49
Posted 30 June 2013 - 01:56 AM
#50
Posted 01 July 2013 - 06:55 AM
Could you maybe write up something similar about players a ppc-munchkin syndrome? Those poor fellows also need some serious rehabilitation...
#51
Posted 01 July 2013 - 07:28 PM
PanzerMagier, on 01 July 2013 - 06:55 AM, said:
Could you maybe write up something similar about players a ppc-munchkin syndrome? Those poor fellows also need some serious rehabilitation...
I say we follow in the footsteps of /sp/ and their tyrannical mods, by becoming #outlaws
#52
Posted 02 July 2013 - 09:58 PM
Oh, and what's going on in this thread?
#53
Posted 03 July 2013 - 12:29 AM
#54
Posted 03 July 2013 - 02:27 AM
#55
Posted 16 July 2013 - 11:02 AM
#57
Posted 16 July 2013 - 12:12 PM
Miragezero, on 29 June 2013 - 08:25 AM, said:
And here we have a successful patient.
Well done Miragezero.
I too have suffered at the hands of these terrible druggies-once whilst patrolling in my trusty non cheese K2 in the forest colony, near the tunnel entrance i was jumped and mugged by an AC40 Jager. Before i could defend myself he had incapiccitated me and was ransacking me for more C-bills to fuel his addiction.
#58
Posted 18 July 2013 - 02:05 PM
Battlecruiser, on 19 June 2013 - 12:52 PM, said:
.....
only those with the means to set rules in stone, and enforce those rules have any legitimate say. Otherwise your that knight with a crossbow bolt through his chest going on about how peasants "have no honor abloo bloo bloo"
grow up.
I can't help but cackle madly at this. I must be a horrible person...I might have an ancestor from the Draconis Combine after all.
#59
Posted 18 July 2013 - 02:08 PM
Battlecruiser, on 19 June 2013 - 01:01 PM, said:
Sorry, I'm not a delusional person who has to trick myself into thinking "OH THEY KILLED ME THEY'RE BAD I FEEL SORRY FOR THEM" so that i can escape both the reality of the situation as well as my own lack of ability and/or equipment.
you're calling them bad, and feeling "sorry" for them so you can continue to justify using a losing configuration, so you can justify not changing, because you're not only delusional, but you're also selfish, and you will sacrifice winning if it means pleasing your own ego and perpetuating the delusion that you're actually a winner, despite losing. If you do not abide by the rules set in stone within the reality you play, if you do not do everything you can to win within those rules, including forcing them to bend on occasion, then you're just meat in front of the grinder. The inflexible do not survive.
I agree with your sentiments, if not your manner of presentation.
Are you sure you're in the right House?
#60
Posted 18 July 2013 - 02:43 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users