Fix Ammo And You Fix Autocannons And Gauss
#1
Posted 09 February 2014 - 03:40 PM
You will then see alot of the FoTM AC builds backing down to a more manageable and sustained load out.
Thoughts?
#2
Posted 09 February 2014 - 03:43 PM
removing that 50% would put it more on part with HS for energy weapons (which took a dual hit of less useful and more needed due to ROF).
I wouldn't mind trying it, it would be different.
#3
Posted 09 February 2014 - 03:43 PM
Automatic rearm costs might help, but that would discourage grinding and lead to a lot of energy boats for noobs.
Autocannons are supposed to be powerful...
#4
Posted 09 February 2014 - 03:44 PM
#5
Posted 09 February 2014 - 03:48 PM
I would love to see in 24 hours how many AC's drop vs Lasers.
#6
Posted 09 February 2014 - 04:04 PM
People will just take more ammo
Problem is convergence
#7
Posted 09 February 2014 - 04:05 PM
Darian DelFord, on 09 February 2014 - 03:40 PM, said:
When this happens I would quit. I play this game for quick 5-10 minute matches so im not tied to the computer for an hour. I doubt anyone wants to sit there for 20 minutes if they are dead and have there mech tied up for that long.
In addition the quick game play makes this game exciting and brings in a younger crowd wich is needed for the game to survive.
#8
Posted 09 February 2014 - 04:05 PM
Figure that out all on your own, did ya?
#9
Posted 09 February 2014 - 04:49 PM
Varent, on 09 February 2014 - 04:05 PM, said:
When this happens I would quit. I play this game for quick 5-10 minute matches so im not tied to the computer for an hour. I doubt anyone wants to sit there for 20 minutes if they are dead and have there mech tied up for that long.
In addition the quick game play makes this game exciting and brings in a younger crowd wich is needed for the game to survive.
Originally CW was meant to make matches last that long, with true objectives and the such. Now whether or not that is still in play I have no idea. I am sure skirmish mode will still be there for the quick games
OneEyed Jack, on 09 February 2014 - 04:05 PM, said:
Figure that out all on your own, did ya?
Yup Yup, rocket science and all that
#10
Posted 09 February 2014 - 05:21 PM
1. LRMs
2. SRMs
3. SSRMs
4. AMS
5. AC/2
6. AC/10
7. LB 10-X
8. Gauss
Contrary to popular belief, Autocannons are not actually that overpowered. The LB 10-X in particular is utter trash, and the AC/2 and AC/10 are sub-par. Only the AC/20, Ultra 5, and AC/5 can qualify as true meta material. And the AC/5 itself is a very anemic weapon; it only seems effective because everything around it has been smashed with the mjolnir nerf hammer. So, you end up shafting most of the weapons in the game just to hurt 3 weapons--1 of which isn't even that powerful.
#11
Posted 09 February 2014 - 05:26 PM
Khobai, on 09 February 2014 - 04:04 PM, said:
People will just take more ammo
Problem is convergence
The cause of most of the issues in this game - that has led to charge mechanics, ghost heat, broken dhs, and Jj supremacy - just to name a few.
#12
Posted 09 February 2014 - 07:29 PM
Autocannons in particular having 3x range instead of 2x range, screen shake, no huge tracer leading the enemy back to you, no heat problems, and a few other minor things it really is no wonder that they are the best weapons.
I don't think convergence will ever be fixed so I'd rather see some "soft" nerfs to balance things out. For example...
- Increase the chance of ammo explosions but reduce the power of them. Right now it's a very slight chance for essentially total destruction. I think I've died from it once. It would be a lot better if explosions were actually common but only did a small (but noticeable/meaningful) amount of damage. Perhaps 20-30% chance but only for 5-10 damage per ton. Not enough to kill you but enough to weaken you and make you think about the drawbacks.
- Give lasers a small chance to cook off and destroy(but not explode) or an even smaller change to explode(but only with 5-10 damage) ammo THROUGH armor. Increase the chances for holding the laser(s) on the same location for longer duration.
#13
Posted 09 February 2014 - 08:45 PM
It may be worthwhile to consider slowing down ROF on autocannons to increase TTK as well.
Edited by Matthew Ace, 09 February 2014 - 08:50 PM.
#14
Posted 09 February 2014 - 09:45 PM
Khobai, on 09 February 2014 - 04:04 PM, said:
People will just take more ammo
Problem is convergence
I won't say it for sure would fix anything but it would definitely have a pretty big affect. Its probably not to uncommon for some AC boats to have 6-10 tons of ammo. Having to double that amount of ammo would require a significant reduction in something else on the mech. Though this would obliviously affect the pure AC boats more than the poptarts with the PPC/AC combo.
#15
Posted 09 February 2014 - 10:13 PM
If you really wanna change ACs, get rid of the big bullet design. Go back to the MW3 style of "clip" shots. AC2 fires 2 bullets, AC5 fires 5, AC10 fires 10, etc. This causes a moderate chance of spread, but the succession of shots is very tight (think of an LB10X, but instead of a shotgun blast it's a stream).
This would maintain their effectiveness against heavier targets, but decrease their effectiveness against lights. It'd be harder to use them as poptart weapons, since as you come down you'd be distributing the stream of rounds over a wider area.
HOWEVER: Time To Kill will become irrelevant once dropship mode comes in, as we'd have "respawns" (sorta). If TTK becomes less relevant, people won't feel so bad about dying so quickly.
#16
Posted 10 February 2014 - 12:16 AM
Darian DelFord, on 09 February 2014 - 03:40 PM, said:
You will then see alot of the FoTM AC builds backing down to a more manageable and sustained load out.
Thoughts?
I don't see how this would improve gameplay
Lasers need a buff more than anything else.
#17
Posted 10 February 2014 - 12:18 AM
Darian DelFord, on 09 February 2014 - 03:40 PM, said:
You will then see alot of the FoTM AC builds backing down to a more manageable and sustained load out.
Thoughts?
I love it.
But cutting down ammo in half or adding rearm, you automatically giving favor to PPC that will lead for another PPC fest
Did you think about it?
#18
Posted 10 February 2014 - 12:33 AM
it's fairly obvious an imbalance exists simply from the heat potential differential across certain guns.
#19
Posted 10 February 2014 - 12:50 AM
#20
Posted 10 February 2014 - 04:07 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users





















