To Bushido or Not to Bushido
#1
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:09 AM
From the beginning of time, in as much as it relates to us here, we have followed the Honor Code of mech combat, primarily defined as:
1. No Heading
2. No Legging
3. No Unnecessary Beatdown of an Incapacitated Foe.
With the potential massive influx of the new 'Pepsi Generation', they're understanding is 'Play to Win'. Every rule of warfare they've ever been subjected to up to this point is 'By Any Means Necessary'
Battletech purists would argue that the most effective method of mech combat completely contradicts the Honor Code we have traditionally clung to. If the game employs salvage rules, this is going to be an even more important topic.
Here it is gang. What do you think?
#2
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:23 AM
For one-on-one combat, if both sides agree to fight honorably, then that is different.
#3
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:32 AM
#4
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:35 AM
#5
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:37 AM
#6
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:40 AM
But it's not like that. There are many types of battles and for each one, different approach is required.
For instance, if I play a friendly match and we agree on not doing it, I won't do it, because we agreed on it.
But then there's other way. The battle plays out and someone on my side is getting attacked. If only way to do so is to leg the opponent, I won't hesitate. If I want to show Clans who is the boss around here, I will follow their rules and so on...
One can't simply tell: "I will/won't fight by the code", and then do so just like that.
#7
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:45 AM
Adridos, on 29 June 2012 - 07:40 AM, said:
Actually, It's really simple, Small Comrade Adridos! Just say 'AahahahaahahahahaahahaAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Naw not doing that. Haha.' and then leg everybody!
Easy as pie.
Edited by Vandal, 29 June 2012 - 07:45 AM.
#8
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:55 AM
#9
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:58 AM
AceTimberwolf, on 29 June 2012 - 07:55 AM, said:
Yeah I was going to say, since when do Capellan's care about honor?
#10
Posted 29 June 2012 - 08:06 AM
What's a light Mech to do in a fight against a heavy Mech? aim its pea-shooters at the thickest part of the wall of steel in front of it and hope the enemy is so visually impaired he won´t hit a single shot?
The only feasible chance it has is to aim at the weakpoints, which are legs, arms and head and you wanna forbid it from using most of its potential?
#11
Posted 29 June 2012 - 08:06 AM
Be like Bronn! Nerdiest post ever?
#12
Posted 29 June 2012 - 08:13 AM
TADA!
#14
Posted 29 June 2012 - 08:37 AM
Vandal, on 29 June 2012 - 07:45 AM, said:
Easy as pie.
I wonder if you did the same if some of your friends asked you for a duel without that... you know, leg him, over heat him with flamers and then practice some dirty things while he can't do anything, since it's his only mech, for example.
#15
Posted 29 June 2012 - 08:54 AM
Is this honorable? I don't know lets ask the guys 10 kilometers away who fired the shot.
#16
Posted 29 June 2012 - 09:21 AM
#17
Posted 29 June 2012 - 09:39 AM
IMTatsu, on 29 June 2012 - 07:09 AM, said:
We need a "headshot kill" icon. It's going to happen, lots and lots considering LRM's seem to rain down from a near vertical angle- and...well, the head happens to be up there, with it's light armor and all that. Likewise, the easiest way to deal with light 'Mechs is probably going to be legging them while they zip over the field at 100+kph, from the look of the Frozen City video.
Shooting up a downed target, though- that's just kicking someone while they're out of the match entirely. Only reason to do it is if you hate their guts to begin with.
Edited by wanderer, 29 June 2012 - 09:41 AM.
#18
Posted 29 June 2012 - 09:49 AM
Are us old-timers just antiquated in the thinking that this is how it should or could be done now?
The conversation is good. There's alot more of you out there to be heard from.
On a side note, I find it amusing that the snake-lovers have to meander their way here to be heard. They don't allow freedom of speech over there? The FWL'er I understand. There's nobody to talk to over there. . .
>:{
#19
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:18 AM
IMTatsu, on 29 June 2012 - 07:09 AM, said:
1. No Heading
2. No Legging
3. No Unnecessary Beatdown of an Incapacitated Foe.
All this dates back to the old Mechwarrior days when legging/heading was strong enough to be the only viable strategy if you had the aim to pull it off. Stats were usually based off of the board game without taking aim into account. Some objected because that didn't fit with the Battletech feel (since weapons can't be aimed that accurately in the board game). Some objected because they were (and are) whiny scrubs with poor aim who refuse to believe that their EPIC SKILLS can be beaten without CHEATING. Neither option is valid today. Designers are accounting for the former, and the latter was never valid to begin with.
In other words, any such honor code is profoundly laughable.
Oh, and calling it Bushido or space-Bushido is also laughable from a historical perspective. The Japanese came up with iaijutsu for a reason; the western concept of "fair fight" didn't exist for them.
Edited by Camembert, 29 June 2012 - 10:20 AM.
#20
Posted 29 June 2012 - 11:50 AM
- Kara "Starbuck" Thrace
We're fighting within a civilisation that had no qualms about glassing entire planets, I doubt anyone will call foul for legging or heading.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users