49 replies to this topic

[Sjorpha]

SgtMagor, on 21 February 2015 - 03:41 AM, said:

Executioner has a Skull similar to the Atlas only prettier Oi!

Yep, and a vagina instead of a penis.

[Lily from animove]

Sjorpha, on 21 February 2015 - 03:53 AM, said:

Yep, and a vagina instead of a penis.

true, but hey look at the original art, it is shaved now

But does it shake it's ass as sexy as the atlas?

Edited by Lily from animove, 21 February 2015 - 04:02 AM.

[KharnZor]

This thread is now somewhere i dont want to be lol

[Golden Vulf]

Brody319, on 20 February 2015 - 07:04 PM, said:

I think its beautiful!

I think a nose would look stupid.

Now its like a skull.

I think it's horrendously ugly. It's the most god-awful looking head they've ever designed. Makes me want to take a claw hammer to my monitor.

In short, it's perfect.




But why do you need to run from only 25 tons of weapons and heatsinks?

Edited by Golden Vulf, 21 February 2015 - 05:10 AM.

[TELEFORCE]

Golden Vulf, on 21 February 2015 - 05:06 AM, said:

But why do you need to run from only 25 tons of weapons and heatsinks?

Well, if physical attacks were implemented, this is a 95-ton monster that can keep up with enemy mediums and heavies and rapid kick their legs off 19-point damage kicks! Not to mention the death-from-above maneuver from this thing! When stock, it has a LOT more leg armor than torso armor since mobility is so important to the chassis. Plus it reinforces the legs during physical combat.

Edited by TELEFORCE, 21 February 2015 - 06:59 AM.

[Deathlike]

Why does it matter so much?

This isn't like the Invasion Gargoyle variant that looks like Pedobear.

Seriously... if it affects hitboxes or balance, then sure. If it doesn't, I don't honestly care.

[Jaspbo1]

Golden Vulf, on 21 February 2015 - 05:06 AM, said:

I think it's horrendously ugly. It's the most god-awful looking head they've ever designed. Makes me want to take a claw hammer to my monitor.

In short, it's perfect.




But why do you need to run from only 25 tons of weapons and heatsinks?

>Implying some 'mechs will be able to out run this thing with MASC.

Edited by Jaspbo1, 22 February 2015 - 03:46 PM.

[Brody319]

Jaspbo1, on 22 February 2015 - 03:45 PM, said:

>Implying some 'mechs will be able to out run this thing with MASC.

94 kph with MASC
can chase down even most mediums with ease.

[Jaspbo1]

Brody319, on 22 February 2015 - 03:48 PM, said:

94 kph with MASC
can chase down even most mediums with ease.

Yeah I should probs rephrase, 'Implying many 'mechs may not be able to outrun this thing with MASC engaged'

[Raziberry]

Spheroid, on 20 February 2015 - 06:55 PM, said:

The cockpit is where the nose should be. As an assault with a giant head on par with the Atlas, the eye slits should be sufficient for vision.

I have never seen this artistic take on the head. It was a nose wasn't it? We see the side profile shot in the original 3050 TRO. TRO:3050U somewhat resembles a window, but it is certainly not definitive.

Logically the nose makes no damn sense anyway. A cockpit window should be in the centre of the face. They'll probably have a canon-accurate face variant like they did for the Gargoyle.