Orion Vs Timber Wolf
#61
Posted 26 July 2015 - 05:45 AM
#62
Posted 26 July 2015 - 06:12 AM
Tahribator, on 26 July 2015 - 05:45 AM, said:
It's really not more durable. Yeah, the STs have additional armor, but it's nearly impossible to miss the orions CT at short range. Otherwise the Timber can better twist and outmaneuver the orion, even at at short range. Twist rate is really low on an 75T mech with STD300/285.
Edited by Averen, 26 July 2015 - 06:12 AM.
#63
Posted 26 July 2015 - 06:15 AM
#64
Posted 26 July 2015 - 06:34 AM
#65
Posted 26 July 2015 - 06:35 AM
Which one I'd fear? Timberwolf in 1 v.s 1 or team, natch. Faster and more maneuverable, with max weight saving tech coupled with lighter weapons and more resilient hitboxes. They don't call it the Timbergod for nothing.
"Fear" and "like" definitely aren't the same thing for me. Which is why...
...I can't wait for December
#66
Posted 26 July 2015 - 07:43 AM
Edited by Deimos Alpha, 28 July 2015 - 04:02 AM.
#67
Posted 26 July 2015 - 07:47 AM
Hit the Deck, on 26 July 2015 - 05:02 AM, said:
What I see is a laughably slow Orion. 60kph? My Banshee goes faster.
Edited by Ultimatum X, 26 July 2015 - 07:47 AM.
#68
Posted 26 July 2015 - 08:00 AM
Ultimatum X, on 26 July 2015 - 07:47 AM, said:
Yes and that was an attempt to match the TBR-C, which I pulled straight out of metamechs.com, I posted earlier. At kissing distance the Orion probably could win because it's quirked for the loadout. Barring certain 'Mechs, I guess that's how IS can win against Clan - by bringing good quirked 'Mechs into the battlefield (CW).
#69
Posted 26 July 2015 - 08:04 AM
Hit the Deck, on 26 July 2015 - 08:00 AM, said:
It can't match the Timber Wolf.
The Orion couldn't even keep up with many IS mechs pre-clan, and people are seriously struggling to figure out if it can compete against the best Clan Heavy?
This isn't a TDR-5SS 7xMPLs vs. some short ranged TBR build where we could actually have a realistic conversation - the entire premise for this thread is completely ridiculous.
Edited by Ultimatum X, 26 July 2015 - 08:05 AM.
#70
Posted 26 July 2015 - 08:04 AM
But that's probably just because nobody takes the orion serious and dealing with UAC mechs is a hassle anyway. Everyone ignores you.
Edited by Averen, 26 July 2015 - 08:10 AM.
#71
Posted 26 July 2015 - 08:29 AM
Red Line Pilot, on 25 July 2015 - 01:22 PM, said:
Which one would you pick, what do you fear the most from the other in a 1v1 or a team game?
Theory crafts away, GO!
The Timberwolf's basic chassis and construction is pretty much an ideal example of how to engineer a heavy mech.
Armor? best available and in abundance!
Structure? half weight for 7 crits.
Engine? providing exceptional speed for a 75 ton mech.
Double heatsinks? check!
The Orion can't even fit a 375XL (caps at a 360) So has one fewer internal engine heatsink and also requires 2 additional crits for the engine and 14 additional crits for it's armor/chassis if it were to equip Endo/Ferro leaving the orion with 29.6 tons remaining and 12 crits slots for equipment.
The Timber will have 27.46 tons and 31 free crit slots. Now keep in mind more compact and lighter clantech weapons more than compensate the timber for having 2 fewer tons of weapon payload.
Essentially what it comes down to is IF clan mechs were fully customizable I would more than likely use a 375XL engine, double heatsinks endo steel and ferro fibrious on a 75 ton chassis.
Building a 75 mech is solve for X and X=Timberwolf.
#72
Posted 26 July 2015 - 09:17 AM
Hit the Deck, on 26 July 2015 - 05:02 AM, said:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...d5524e0d6c412a4
Not quite as good in terms of firepower and ammo. But it has much higher speed and agility. Combine that with case all over and a better XL than the IS equivalent. So I'm inclined to believe that on the top tier clan mechs you're not that handicapped by the system.
#73
Posted 26 July 2015 - 10:21 AM
While the timberwolf is lore wise more advanced than the orion(one of the oldest heavies) i don't think it can stand up to the orion IN GAME. They have the same armor however clan mechs suffer from overheating because their weapons are hotter than IS ones, plus IS have quirks, the timberwolf has only NEGATIVE quirks which unless elited they really drag it down. Given the same skill level i think the orion would come on top of it, heck it even scared me 2 times in my brawler Victor.
#74
Posted 26 July 2015 - 10:34 AM
Sure, it may not be the best 'Mech to work with, but the Orion has its good points if you can look beyond its glaring flaws (tbh I have always wished its huge left shoulder would go away when not carrying missiles, but oh well).
#75
Posted 26 July 2015 - 11:17 AM
The Orion makes it kinda obvious in how it doesn't have much more firepower than a timber (those SRMs are even pretty hot), while being as slow as an assault.
Dashen, on 26 July 2015 - 10:21 AM, said:
While the timberwolf is lore wise more advanced than the orion(one of the oldest heavies) i don't think it can stand up to the orion IN GAME. They have the same armor however clan mechs suffer from overheating because their weapons are hotter than IS ones, plus IS have quirks, the timberwolf has only NEGATIVE quirks which unless elited they really drag it down. Given the same skill level i think the orion would come on top of it, heck it even scared me 2 times in my brawler Victor.
Sorry for the frank laguage, but that's complete nonsense. In close combat a big engines makes it easier to outmaneuver enemies or to utilize cover, only a bad players stay still in a fight, no matter the distance. More importantly, the Timber has a lot more torsotwist due to the huge engine, even with minimal negative quirks.
Clan mechs also do not actually suffer more from overheating than IS mechs. That's only because their laser-alphas are insane. Shouldn't come as a surprise if a 28pt alpha (2LL+2ML, 12 tons) does cause less heat than a 42pt alpha (6erml, 6 tons). Quirks are nice, but they don't change much if a laser does 40% more damage and the mech can carry 50% more heatsinks. An Orion gets 28% of heat by firing a 24 SRM alpha.
An Orion will be always worse than a timber. The CT is incredible vulnerable, the arm based SRM have terrible convergence and you'd be happy if a third of the rockets hit the enemy CT. An AC20/SRM variant might be able to outlast the Timber in terms of heat, but at that point it might not even matter anymore since one of the mechs might be dead as well after 3 alphas.
Edited by Averen, 26 July 2015 - 11:18 AM.
#76
Posted 26 July 2015 - 11:38 AM
#77
Posted 26 July 2015 - 11:45 AM
WonderSparks, on 26 July 2015 - 10:34 AM, said:
Sure, it may not be the best 'Mech to work with, but the Orion has its good points if you can look beyond its glaring flaws (tbh I have always wished its huge left shoulder would go away when not carrying missiles, but oh well).
See, I'm with you on this one man, what ever happened to the players that defied the meta and just played what they thought would be fun? I'm not Jade Falcon because it's the cool thing. I don't pilot Clan mechs because they are leet. I play Jade falcon and pilot a Summoner because ever since the initial 3050 Source Book was released, It's what i wanted to use. Every time I load into a game, it's a bit of teenager nostalgia coming to say hello. I posted back when all there was of MWO were just forums, I wanted a Jade Falcon Summoner, and damn straight, I have it now. To everyone else, the Summoner blows and even I keep pushing for them to make it a bit better, but that doesn't make it a crap mech like many claim it to be.
You meta Try-hards really ruin a game for those that just want to have fun.
The Orion is a good mech, who cares if another one is better on a spread sheet. Follow the herd boys, follow the herd.
#78
Posted 26 July 2015 - 12:28 PM
Ronyn, on 26 July 2015 - 11:45 AM, said:
See, I'm with you on this one man, what ever happened to the players that defied the meta and just played what they thought would be fun? I'm not Jade Falcon because it's the cool thing. I don't pilot Clan mechs because they are leet. I play Jade falcon and pilot a Summoner because ever since the initial 3050 Source Book was released, It's what i wanted to use. Every time I load into a game, it's a bit of teenager nostalgia coming to say hello. I posted back when all there was of MWO were just forums, I wanted a Jade Falcon Summoner, and damn straight, I have it now. To everyone else, the Summoner blows and even I keep pushing for them to make it a bit better, but that doesn't make it a crap mech like many claim it to be.
You meta Try-hards really ruin a game for those that just want to have fun.
The Orion is a good mech, who cares if another one is better on a spread sheet. Follow the herd boys, follow the herd.
I'm also with you.
All my mechs follow the purpose for which they have been created, i'm not metaplayer and i leave that to youngstes
#79
Posted 26 July 2015 - 01:45 PM
Dashen, on 26 July 2015 - 10:21 AM, said:
While the timberwolf is lore wise more advanced than the orion(one of the oldest heavies) i don't think it can stand up to the orion IN GAME. They have the same armor however clan mechs suffer from overheating because their weapons are hotter than IS ones, plus IS have quirks, the timberwolf has only NEGATIVE quirks which unless elited they really drag it down. Given the same skill level i think the orion would come on top of it, heck it even scared me 2 times in my brawler Victor.
The difference is that the 81kph mech has the freedom to dictate the engagement range. If your 55kph mech is fit to brawl, then sorry but you lose.
Orion just isn't that great. Short range firepower in most cases coupled with low weapon mounts, slow speed, and 75t armor values. Even if it makes its way into range, it's relying upon the enemy making mistakes, or the allied team shouldering the burden of carrying.
#80
Posted 26 July 2015 - 02:10 PM
Timberwolf is better in every way with the current implementations, even with quirkage. That said i think Orions are fun... not optimal but fun if you pilot them with knowedge of limitations.
8 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users