I need some advice.
#1
Posted 15 July 2012 - 10:27 PM
#2
Posted 15 July 2012 - 10:50 PM
$600
Case: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16811148060
PSU: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16817207013
Motherboard: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16813157280
CPU: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819103727
GPU: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814161389
RAM: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16820220561
HDD: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822136769
ODD: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16827135204
OS: Windows 8 Beta
Heatsink: stock
TIM: stock
Sale Combos: none
Promo Codes: HARDOCPX711B
If you can afford it, any increase in budget on that should probably go to buying Windows 7.
Although, given that you're, as you said "not a big PC gamer", then if graphics aren't your concern, may I recommend the following? It's more suited towards being faster in day-to-day tasks, and being quiet and energy efficient, while still exceeding MWO's requirements.
Case: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16811148061
Power supply: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16817182066
Motherboard:
AMD- http://www.newegg.co...N82E16813157280
Intel- http://www.newegg.co...N82E16813157303
CPU:
AMD- http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819103727
Intel- http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819115077
GPU: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814161414
RAM: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16820231479
SSD: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16820226236
ODD: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16827135204
OS: Windows 8 beta (Or +$100 for windows 7 OEM: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16832116986 )
Heatsink: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16835226050
Promo Code:
AMD- HARDOCPX711B
Intel- EMCNCJN34
If you're not willing to build your own, then this will be your best bet;
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16883157362
Although it will be far, far slower, less reliable, louder, less energy efficient, and won't last as long.
Edited by Vulpesveritas, 15 July 2012 - 11:47 PM.
#3
Posted 15 July 2012 - 10:51 PM
it can be built using part from www.newegg.com but I'm sure you can find cheaper elsewhere but shipping my catch up to you and kill your savings ordering from multiple sites.
#4
Posted 15 July 2012 - 10:53 PM
Syclonus, on 15 July 2012 - 10:51 PM, said:
it can be built using part from www.newegg.com but I'm sure you can find cheaper elsewhere but shipping my catch up to you and kill your savings ordering from multiple sites.
What decent PSU out that claims 730w? Not to mention, why the heck would you put such a large PSU in such a low power consumption system? lol.
#5
Posted 15 July 2012 - 10:58 PM
#6
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:01 PM
#7
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:02 PM
#8
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:02 PM
Syclonus, on 15 July 2012 - 10:58 PM, said:
That's a horrible PSU, that by looking at the 12V rails will never ever reach anywhere near 750W, more like mid 500.
Merrick, on 15 July 2012 - 11:02 PM, said:
Which is why you should choose a PSU with reliable internals, that one does not have them and will be dead inside 3 years.
Edited by DV McKenna, 15 July 2012 - 11:04 PM.
#9
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:05 PM
Syclonus, on 15 July 2012 - 10:58 PM, said:
"not a very bad PSU"?
Let's see what's wrong with it here.
- The 12v Rails can only support ~550w, which means for a modern PC it is only a 550w PSU.
- It isn't even 80% energy efficient
- The OEM is a crap brand.
Even when looking at cheap-o parts, this is better for the same $$$; http://www.newegg.co...N82E16817182200
Syclonus, on 15 July 2012 - 11:01 PM, said:

Well, that Phenom II X4 is faster than an i3 in multithread (see current and future applications), and the difference between a Phenom II X4 and an i5-2500k in CryENGINE 3 (see what MWO is running on) is only two frames per second. For... $100 less.

Edited by Vulpesveritas, 15 July 2012 - 11:09 PM.
#10
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:05 PM
* lol at the 2 troll comments (whats a 730W psu annyway?)
and that 965 is not a bulldozer yay vulps
you can oc that cpu as well you wont have any problems don't listen to the intell fanboys
Edited by Scilya, 15 July 2012 - 11:09 PM.
#11
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:07 PM
Delta One, on 15 July 2012 - 10:27 PM, said:
#12
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:08 PM
Grey Weasel, on 15 July 2012 - 11:07 PM, said:
The problem with such computers is that the components will be basic OEM kit, that quite simply is the cheap crappy kit that will offer no long term viability.
#13
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:10 PM
Grey Weasel, on 15 July 2012 - 11:07 PM, said:
DV McKenna, on 15 July 2012 - 11:08 PM, said:
The problem with such computers is that the components will be basic OEM kit, that quite simply is the cheap crappy kit that will offer no long term viability.
This, and you're going to get a crap graphics card for the price.
#14
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:12 PM
Grey Weasel, on 15 July 2012 - 11:07 PM, said:
u high?????? always cheaper and better quality to custom id stay WELL AWAY from places like currys, pc world and supermarkets if i were you
#15
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:15 PM
Scilya, on 15 July 2012 - 11:05 PM, said:
you can oc that cpu as well you wont have any problems don't listen to the intell fanboys
The only BD chips I recommend are;
The FX-6200 for gaming / Overclocking at $160
The FX-8120 for multitasking at $160
Other than that, the Phenom II 965 is still the best deal at $100-110. no reason to up the CPU at this level of cost.
#16
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:25 PM
DV McKenna, on 15 July 2012 - 11:08 PM, said:
The problem with such computers is that the components will be basic OEM kit, that quite simply is the cheap crappy kit that will offer no long term viability.
#17
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:38 PM
Grey Weasel, on 15 July 2012 - 11:25 PM, said:
Ummm Yes, walmart offer Dells,HP,Acer and referbs of said brands each of these companies use generic OEM parts to keep costs down.
The custom build items are from Ibuypower and Cyberpower both ok pre builders however again read the system descriptions on offer and you will find the only named part is the processor, because everything else will be OEM kit no too mention for $500 USD on Walmart your getting a GT 520 or AMD 6450 GPU...thats not going to play much very well compare that too the 7770 above...
They don't even make a mention of the Brand or power rating of the PSU...as if you needed any more alarm bells to start ringing out.
People are suggesting components because its a well known fact, that for the same cost you get far more for your money and far longer longevity and upgrade ability by building your own and its not that hard to do.
Edited by DV McKenna, 15 July 2012 - 11:39 PM.
#18
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:43 PM
I looked into ibuypower's custom builder through the site and again, not impressive. The lowest GPU offering worth picking was the GTX 550 TI, and even picking base options everywhere else (except an upgrade to 8gb ram) brought the system to $689 total. The base CPU offering is the FX 4100, which I wouldn't place faith in overclocking very far with an unknown PSU and the stock cooler.
The DIY build is $88 cheaper with higher quality parts and a better GPU.
I mean, sure the prebuilt is decent. But once you build your own you get bit by the bug of knowing the quality of parts that go into your system, and knowing that your system is a steal for its price.
Edited by Shivus, 15 July 2012 - 11:47 PM.
#19
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:48 PM
Vulpesveritas, on 15 July 2012 - 11:15 PM, said:
The FX-6200 for gaming / Overclocking at $160
The FX-8120 for multitasking at $160
Other than that, the Phenom II 965 is still the best deal at $100-110. no reason to up the CPU at this level of cost.
when BD first came out i was annoyed about the performance yes but what realy REALY bugged me is everywhere i went all the shop PC's wer all getting "FREE UPGRADES" from the phenom ii 975 to the FX4100 god i was so pissed off.
if i were to get a FX it would be the 8150 wouldn't go lower than that but im happy with the cpu i have now. im hoping piledriver is what i wanted bulldozer to be
#20
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:50 PM
Scilya, on 15 July 2012 - 11:48 PM, said:
when BD first came out i was annoyed about the performance yes but what realy REALY bugged me is everywhere i went all the shop PC's wer all getting "FREE UPGRADES" from the phenom ii 975 to the FX4100 god i was so pissed off.
if i were to get a FX it would be the 8150 wouldn't go lower than that but im happy with the cpu i have now. im hoping piledriver is what i wanted bulldozer to be
Well, in fairness an 8120 is a better value than an 8150, especially if you overclock, and an FX-6200 is slightly faster than a Thubian 1100t.
But yes, pretty much hoping Piledriver is what BD was advertised / hyped to be.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
















