Leg The Atlas
#1
Posted 10 December 2016 - 07:52 AM
#2
Posted 10 December 2016 - 07:55 AM
If you leg it the Atlas cannot make it in time and the defenders auto-lost.
At least thats my interpretation.
#3
Posted 10 December 2016 - 07:55 AM
#4
Posted 10 December 2016 - 08:39 AM
Snazzy Dragon, on 10 December 2016 - 07:55 AM, said:
If they had to make a 300 ton Atlas then they shouldn't have bothered with the game mode. Why create situations that emphasize the flaws of the game?
#5
Posted 10 December 2016 - 08:42 AM
I would've much rather it was a large (multiple vehicles) convoy, which you'd need to protect and depending on how many vehicles survive the mission, you'd get extra loot.
#6
Posted 10 December 2016 - 08:48 AM
Davers, on 10 December 2016 - 08:39 AM, said:
Yeah it's not like governments/corps don't make specialized heavily armored versions of vehicles for moving important people/stuff. oh wait...
I do kinda like Joudos idea of having multiple smaller vehicles being used instead. That said we'll have to see how the mode/game play goes before making an baseless DOA declaration.
#7
Posted 10 December 2016 - 08:51 AM
2. LURMZ
3. Profit.
That NPC piloted pile of rust is not going to seek cover.
#8
Posted 10 December 2016 - 08:53 AM
#9
Posted 10 December 2016 - 08:54 AM
#10
Posted 10 December 2016 - 08:59 AM
Edited by Roughneck45, 10 December 2016 - 08:59 AM.
#11
Posted 10 December 2016 - 09:02 AM
Sorbic, on 10 December 2016 - 08:48 AM, said:
Yeah it's not like governments/corps don't make specialized heavily armored versions of vehicles for moving important people/stuff. oh wait...
I do kinda like Joudos idea of having multiple smaller vehicles being used instead. That said we'll have to see how the mode/game play goes before making an baseless DOA declaration.
Well, I would have rather they added a 100 ton APC with a low profile than an Atlas that needs to be completely reworked to be viable. I guess we will find out on patch day, but I'm thinking a lot of VIP.'s are going to miss their flights.
#12
Posted 10 December 2016 - 09:05 AM
In all seriousness, though, I'm going to try group dropping with some friends in a bunch of flamer mechs to keep the enemy locked at 90% heat while everyone else focus fires on the atlas. Or, if the atlas does shoot back, overheat that instead and ggez headshot it.
Edited by Snazzy Dragon, 10 December 2016 - 09:06 AM.
#13
Posted 10 December 2016 - 09:09 AM
#14
Posted 10 December 2016 - 09:17 AM
#15
Posted 10 December 2016 - 09:46 AM
#16
Posted 10 December 2016 - 09:54 AM
Also game play wise this is just going to lead to a defender cuddle box around the atlas and the attackers just poking it to death with PPCs and LRMs from 600+ meters.
The whole game mode just seems half baked to me.
Edited by FirestormClone218, 10 December 2016 - 09:55 AM.
#17
Posted 10 December 2016 - 10:27 AM
Roughneck45, on 10 December 2016 - 08:59 AM, said:
Yea, i dont see this panning out well. Its a HUGE, SLOW target that DOESNT SHOOT BACK?
Gonna be a cake walk to attackers. Just leg the atlas from 500M out and its game over. Should have been a convoy, like in other games or versions of this game, small APC or something with a trailer. Make it half size (or less) of the Destructible bases in Domination and we might have a mode.
ON top of that there should be two! a decoy and a real one, let the enemies figure out which one is which.
#18
Posted 10 December 2016 - 10:50 AM
RedDragon, on 10 December 2016 - 09:46 AM, said:
You're right. Nobody on the forum guessed that Domination would lead to such predictable and boring matches on most maps.
FirestormClone218, on 10 December 2016 - 09:54 AM, said:
That would actually have been amazing. I would actually be onboard with that. Would have been 1000 times cooler than these Atlas shenanigans.
#19
Posted 10 December 2016 - 11:02 AM
Antares102, on 10 December 2016 - 07:55 AM, said:
If you leg it the Atlas cannot make it in time and the defenders auto-lost.
At least thats my interpretation.
If its like that, it will be a ****** gamemode.
#20
Posted 10 December 2016 - 11:08 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users