What's with this long queue wait time? The searching spins and spins. Are ghost drops no longer a thing?
0
Faction Matchmaking
Started by Bownd, Dec 17 2016 09:01 PM
7 replies to this topic
#2
-
-
- The Jaws
- 6,368 posts
Member
- Locationnowhere
Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:03 PM
Bownd, on 17 December 2016 - 09:01 PM, said:
What's with this long queue wait time? The searching spins and spins. Are ghost drops no longer a thing?
so other people are experiencing a problem as well. Yea, pretty much killed the mood, but we crushed all day.
#3
-
-
- The Messenger
- 519 posts
Member
Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:04 PM
so no longer any queue info, or bonus for waisting our time.
searchwarrior online.
searchwarrior online.
#4
-
-
- Ace Of Spades
- 1,917 posts
Member
Posted 18 December 2016 - 01:17 AM
The IS lost their PuGs. For obvious reasons.
#5
-
- Big Brother
- 6 posts
Rookie
Posted 16 April 2017 - 07:06 PM
Is there any way to balance the faction play queuing. More often then not it is a bunch of pugs on one side against an almost full team. Can the teams be paired up and then fill in with pugs? Its just crazy going from one day being in a team dominating a bunch of pugs, then the next day being the pugs and getting squashed by some elite unit. Where is the consistency? I know teams are playing on both sides, but the teams are mostly going against pugs and not one another.
TL:DR
1. Teams vs Teams w/ Pugs to fill
2. Pugs vs Pugs w/ Units to fill
Not everyone has the time to commit to some elite unit, some of us just want to enjoy the faction gameplay, but it's not enjoyable if you getting stomped because the matchmaking is ALWAYS pairing the pugs against some team that happens to be playing.
TL:DR
1. Teams vs Teams w/ Pugs to fill
2. Pugs vs Pugs w/ Units to fill
Not everyone has the time to commit to some elite unit, some of us just want to enjoy the faction gameplay, but it's not enjoyable if you getting stomped because the matchmaking is ALWAYS pairing the pugs against some team that happens to be playing.
Edited by PattyKaz, 16 April 2017 - 07:06 PM.
#6
-
-
- Littlest Helper
- 29,240 posts
Member
- Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad
Posted 16 April 2017 - 08:03 PM
You can't do that.
Imagine the MM we have now, only at 1/4 (or whatever fraction) of the population.
What you're asking for cannot possibly function any better, given how badly the MM fails as it does now.
Imagine the MM we have now, only at 1/4 (or whatever fraction) of the population.
What you're asking for cannot possibly function any better, given how badly the MM fails as it does now.
Edited by Deathlike, 16 April 2017 - 08:04 PM.
#7
-
-
- Mercenary Rank 6
- 1,724 posts
Member
- Location7th circle of hell
Posted 16 April 2017 - 08:15 PM
maybe they should do a match kicks off every 5 minutes like comp, and match by group sizes....
#8
-
-
- Littlest Helper
- 29,240 posts
Member
- Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad
Posted 16 April 2017 - 08:20 PM
naterist, on 16 April 2017 - 08:15 PM, said:
maybe they should do a match kicks off every 5 minutes like comp, and match by group sizes....
You're assuming that it is easy to find 2 groups that have the same size AND that happen to be similarly tiered (which already doesn't work).
You have to know how effective the current MM works before even suggesting that.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
