Certain Mech variants as per Sarna uses weapons and technology that isn't in MWO yet, such as the UM-R68 using ATM-30, TBR-F with Anti-Personnel Gauss Rifles, TBR-U with LRT-15. etc. etc.
Would you be okay if PGI Retconned variants, or simply put placeholders? Like the UM-R68 using LRM20 for an ATM-30?
0
Retcon/placeholder Equipments? Y/n
Started by The6thMessenger, Jan 13 2017 05:09 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
-
-
- Nova Captain
- 8,104 posts
Member
- LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.
Posted 13 January 2017 - 05:09 PM
#2
-
-
- The 1 Percent
- 7,322 posts
Member
- LocationDelios
Posted 13 January 2017 - 06:03 PM
With weaponry, I'd feel really weird about them doing replacements. With something like, say... Improved Jump Jets, or "light" active probes, I wouldn't care. But that's me specifically.
#3
-
-
- Philanthropist
- 294 posts
Member
Posted 13 January 2017 - 06:04 PM
The anti personnel pods on some of the omnimechs, what happened to them? I looked up and it appears they added armor in place of them. So substitution might work. But they really need to advance the time line weapons or at least round out IS with missing catergories.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users
