How Is This Build?
#1
Posted 16 November 2017 - 08:09 AM
#2
Posted 16 November 2017 - 08:19 AM
#3
Posted 16 November 2017 - 09:06 AM
If you still want to use the missile slot perhaps a RL15.
Edited by Spheroid, 16 November 2017 - 09:15 AM.
#4
Posted 16 November 2017 - 09:23 AM
Athom83, on 16 November 2017 - 08:19 AM, said:
Good idea. I might get rid of the rocket launcher on the build, for extra ammo.
#6
Posted 16 November 2017 - 09:02 PM
Feezou, on 16 November 2017 - 08:09 AM, said:
XL engine works fine, contrary to popular wisdom. (Some people still don't know how many times the hitboxes have changed on Dragons; so long as you're facing them down, your STs are reasonably difficult to hit. It's if you try twisting to protect yourself that you actually Screw yourself).
Reduce rear armor significantly. Funnel it forward; 30 something front armor is barely enough for a light.... imagine a heavy with all that bulk.... Your average unquirked medium is carrying 40 to almost 60 points of armor on the front torsos... 36 is just unacceptable.
If you're only bringing 2 medium lasers... choose either the arm or the side torso. ST is fine if you're someone whom uses armlock anyway. Arm is better if you don't use armlock, because this means your RAC and MLs can be focused on the same target regardless of where they hide. I normally prefer streaks, that way 100% of your firepower can be run against whatever you're aiming at.
#7
Posted 17 November 2017 - 03:12 AM
Feezou, on 16 November 2017 - 08:09 AM, said:
Try this on for size: http://mwo.smurfy-ne...416b03e1b46a5f6
LFE version: http://mwo.smurfy-ne...e7bf45a2814f6ad
Actually, with the Civil War UACs perhaps I should go and rebuy a 1C now myself.
Koniving, on 16 November 2017 - 09:02 PM, said:
Edited by Horseman, 17 November 2017 - 03:15 AM.
#8
Posted 17 November 2017 - 06:13 AM
In all seriousness though.
Old Dragons + XL engine. Typically, these are even slow dragons.
That's back when the hitboxes were crap.
These were the hitboxes back then.
This is what people think they currently are. However the hitbox has changed twice since this was made.
As for what they actually are, I think that should be kept a secret. But know that Dragons can take abuse and XL engines are still good.
LFE is better, as is standard engines if you have good CT firepower. But there's nothing wrong with an XL even if it's only an XL 300 or 270.
#9
Posted 17 November 2017 - 06:18 AM
If you're slower, dedicate no more than 2 to the rear, focusing it all on the front and remember at no point should they get behind you. There's no excuse for it. The Dragon has a wide twist range, and as shown in the Trial Dragon video, a wide arm range. This mech can run away from an enemy and still unless its entire payload (if carrying Streaks or LRMs) onto a target directly behind it, while exposing ZERO of its rear torso. There is no excuse if an enemy gets a shot on your rear torso.
#10
Posted 17 November 2017 - 12:04 PM
Koniving, on 17 November 2017 - 06:13 AM, said:
Quoted For Truth. My Dragons are running XL by default, and death by side torso loss is quite rare in my experience.
Quote
3xUAC2 + 2xML is currently the default build on one of my 5Ns. It both performs great and is extremely fun.
#11
Posted 17 November 2017 - 01:35 PM
(Almost) no mech is viable without double heat-sinks.
#12
Posted 17 November 2017 - 02:10 PM
epikt, on 17 November 2017 - 01:35 PM, said:
Athom83, on 16 November 2017 - 08:19 AM, said:
Spheroid, on 16 November 2017 - 09:06 AM, said:
Horseman, on 17 November 2017 - 03:12 AM, said:
Edited by Horseman, 17 November 2017 - 02:10 PM.
#13
Posted 17 November 2017 - 02:22 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users