Jump to content

Tharkad Stats


44 replies to this topic

#21 Tom Sawyer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Widow Maker
  • The Widow Maker
  • 1,370 posts
  • LocationOn your 6

Posted 07 December 2017 - 10:17 AM

There was NO battle for Tharkad. You are clearly suffering from mechpack purchasing withdraw. Head straight to the store and get to buying.

#22 Tarl Cabot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Tai-sho
  • Tai-sho
  • 6,751 posts
  • LocationImperial City, Luthien - Draconis Combine

Posted 07 December 2017 - 03:19 PM

That is hilarious... you would think they would have had a spreadsheet setup then import the data by now so that all they have to do is copy/paste...

/tinfoil helmet... Of course, waiting until AFTER MECH_CON would mean they do not have to answer embarrassing questions that the stats may bring forth... /chuckles....

#23 _____________McGoat_____________

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Gold Champ
  • CS 2019 Gold Champ
  • 531 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 03:44 PM

It is entirely absurd. By the time they release the stats they will have had every chance to bake them as needed to fit the narrative. Imagine the forum if the IS has been robbed of their first FP event victory, which is probably why they are not releasing them.

Edited by McGoat, 07 December 2017 - 03:45 PM.


#24 Alexandra Hekmatyar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Raider
  • The Raider
  • 771 posts
  • LocationNetherlands

Posted 07 December 2017 - 07:00 PM

View PostTarl Cabot, on 07 December 2017 - 03:19 PM, said:

/tinfoil helmet... Of course, waiting until AFTER MECH_CON would mean they do not have to answer embarrassing questions that the stats may bring forth... /chuckles....


What if the real conspiracy is that they gonna reveal the stats ON MECHCON?! :o
http://www.dramabutton.com

View PostMcGoat, on 07 December 2017 - 03:44 PM, said:

It is entirely absurd. By the time they release the stats they will have had every chance to bake them as needed to fit the narrative. Imagine the forum if the IS has been robbed of their first FP event victory, which is probably why they are not releasing them.


Well IS most likely won more invasion on that event but that doesn't say anything since you need to win just enough so that the tug of war goes the other way, which basically happened when a mayor contributor to the tug of war moved over the the clammers on the last few days.

I'm still salty about the fact that the devs manually 'fixed' the tug of war victory conditions after the fact though.

#25 Davegt27

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 6,366 posts
  • LocationCO

Posted 07 December 2017 - 07:14 PM

View PostMcGoat, on 07 December 2017 - 03:44 PM, said:

It is entirely absurd. By the time they release the stats they will have had every chance to bake them as needed to fit the narrative. Imagine the forum if the IS has been robbed of their first FP event victory, which is probably why they are not releasing them.


what! leave the tin hat stuff to old people like me lol

maybe a year ago when they cared about FP they might cook the books

just take it as it is

they are busy and will have the stats up when he gets a chance

#26 _____________McGoat_____________

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Gold Champ
  • CS 2019 Gold Champ
  • 531 posts

Posted 08 December 2017 - 04:53 AM

View PostLady Alexandra Cousland, on 07 December 2017 - 07:00 PM, said:


Well IS most likely won more invasion on that event but that doesn't say anything since you need to win just enough so that the tug of war goes the other way, which basically happened when a mayor contributor to the tug of war moved over the the clammers on the last few days.

I'm still salty about the fact that the devs manually 'fixed' the tug of war victory conditions after the fact though.


I didn't intend to have it come across that IS would have won - more about the amount of victories and had there been no silly tug of war or coding errors a victory may have been had. I stand by that events need be be based off percentages, given the population and the clear push by MS the last two days.

#27 Doomfist

    Member

  • Pip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10 posts

Posted 12 December 2017 - 11:45 AM

sooooo about them stats

#28 justcallme A S H

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Referee
  • CS 2019 Referee
  • 7,499 posts
  • LocationMelbourne, AU

Posted 12 December 2017 - 03:43 PM

Forever waiting, wanting...

#29 Xannatharr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 425 posts

Posted 13 December 2017 - 12:07 PM

Posted Image

#30 ApexSun

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 125 posts
  • LocationHouston, TX USA

Posted 13 December 2017 - 04:26 PM

I myself am pretty interested to see how the owner of the planet tag was determined.

#31 Doomfist

    Member

  • Pip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10 posts

Posted 13 December 2017 - 04:51 PM

I'm thinking IS actually won after they looked at the stats, but now cant post it without looking completely incompetent?

#32 Grus

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Little Devil
  • Little Devil
  • 3,980 posts

Posted 13 December 2017 - 05:08 PM

Si..

#33 Johnathan Tanner

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Patron Saint
  • The Patron Saint
  • 865 posts
  • LocationCurrently dodging the pugs war crimes tribunal

Posted 13 December 2017 - 05:16 PM

View PostDoomfist, on 13 December 2017 - 04:51 PM, said:

I'm thinking IS actually won after they looked at the stats, but now cant post it without looking completely incompetent?

You think?

#34 Tarl Cabot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Tai-sho
  • Tai-sho
  • 6,751 posts
  • LocationImperial City, Luthien - Draconis Combine

Posted 14 December 2017 - 10:10 AM

View PostDoomfist, on 13 December 2017 - 04:51 PM, said:

I'm thinking IS actually won after they looked at the stats, but now cant post it without looking completely incompetent?

If Tharkard had been setup the same as Luthien, Clans would have won by several battles at the end. Matt deal is that he meant it to set it up so it only took ONE battle pass the starting point in the middle to win, which is sad considering we are talking about a CAPITOL and the surrounding planets. That is what he meant by making a tie ALMOST impossible to happen.

I do believe Matt. By providing the Clans with a win and a possible expectation that the next series of CAPITOL battles will rest on who has 1%+ wins has set it up so that at least for the Clans, it will be worthwhile to participate. While for IS with the more numerous pug crowd, it may likely ensure that Clans do win the next set of campaigns.

And why not? It will allow the season to end and start a new season, since the IS forces are more on the defensive side of things, there is no movement towards the Clan homeworlds, and PGI still has not fixed the War History.

#35 vonJerg

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • 242 posts

Posted 14 December 2017 - 11:16 AM

War history is just that, history.

#36 Wing 0

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 794 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 14 December 2017 - 12:51 PM

You guys are still talking about this tharkad fkery in regarding of stats again? Honestly.. Who gives a fk.

#37 naterist

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary Rank 6
  • Mercenary Rank 6
  • 1,724 posts
  • Location7th circle of hell

Posted 22 December 2017 - 02:38 PM

View PostMcGoat, on 05 December 2017 - 10:08 AM, said:

"We don't want them to see that IS had indeed won a vast majority of the event, give away MC for just doing a drop and shooting a couple mechs."

Russ to Matt when it became glaringly obvious that the IS "should" have won had there been no tug of war or coding errors.

Tharkad stats, please


we have a winner ladies and gentlemen. he called it first. you win a meaningless forum award. ggwp

#38 Zorakh

    Member

  • Pip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 15 posts
  • LocationWashington State

Posted 22 December 2017 - 04:21 PM

Up until last night, Tharkad was showing Jade Falcon, [R79T] ... today, Dec 22, it's back to Steiner.. what's up with that?

#39 justcallme A S H

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Referee
  • CS 2019 Referee
  • 7,499 posts
  • LocationMelbourne, AU

Posted 22 December 2017 - 04:33 PM

Exactly what should have happened in the first place. Given IS won more matches.

The ToW bar is broken. Has been since it's creation. Maybe after two failed attempts to use it, PGI might sit back and actually realise it IS BROKEN and fix it for events they hinge everything on?

Problem is once the bar is maxed, wins are not 'stored' or 'banked' like they should be. Hence all that matters is the dying hours of the event... Which is plain silly. PGI said it wouldn't come down to the dying hours, so they have no choice but to reneg on the incorrect assignment of a Clan Win as the stats don't support it, and never were.

Gonna be interesting to see how the spin is put on this one.

#40 Harper Steel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Dragoon
  • The Dragoon
  • 192 posts
  • Locationwashington state

Posted 22 December 2017 - 06:54 PM

very very lame





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users