139 replies to this topic

[The pessimistic optimist]

This is what I am run on it right now as a brawler that can also snipe at long range and light gauss make it so I never have to stop firing in a brawl with 32% cooldown on those. I like too see other peoples builds see what ideas they came up with and maybe something I didn't think off.

https://mwo.smurfy-n...9bc85147f1745cf

[martian]

SirSmokes, on 23 February 2020 - 10:58 AM, said:

This is what I am run on it right now as a brawler that can also snipe at long range and light gauss make it so I never have to stop firing in a brawl with 32% cooldown on those. I like too see other peoples builds see what ideas they came up with and maybe something I didn't think off.

https://mwo.smurfy-n...9bc85147f1745cf

You do not see many Orions in the game these days.

[The pessimistic optimist]

martian, on 23 February 2020 - 11:17 AM, said:

You do not see many Orions in the game these days.

Yea that's too bad there great brawlers that can take a beating.

[Prototelis]

Sustained DPS of a light mech. Artemis pointless on SRM 4.

3/10 build is bad

"3d chess"

[The pessimistic optimist]

Prototelis, on 23 February 2020 - 11:31 AM, said:

Sustained DPS of a light mech. Artemis pointless on SRM 4.

3/10 build is bad

"3d chess"

I average 800 +damage a match but yea I was thinking artemis might not be needed but I do like my damage to go were I am aim it.

Edited by SirSmokes, 23 February 2020 - 11:37 AM.

[Prototelis]

SirSmokes, on 23 February 2020 - 11:36 AM, said:

I average 800 +damage a match

I think we had this conversation, and the answer to that is "probably not"

Here's the part where you post 3-4 outlier games.

Edited by Prototelis, 23 February 2020 - 11:39 AM.

[The pessimistic optimist]

Prototelis, on 23 February 2020 - 11:39 AM, said:

I think we had this conversation, and the answer to that is "probably not"

Here's the part where you post 3-4 outlier games.

No most match were my team not stupid it's 800 + but you may have a point about the artemis but I was thinking about this before.

Edited by SirSmokes, 23 February 2020 - 11:41 AM.

[Prototelis]

So in your own words; it only averages 800 damage per match when you think it should matter. IE when you cherry pick.

lol k

"3d chess"

[The pessimistic optimist]

Prototelis, on 23 February 2020 - 11:41 AM, said:

So in your own words; it only averages 800 damage per match when you think it should matter. IE when you cherry pick.

lol k

"3d chess"

That makes zero sense it works when it should there for bad?

Edited by SirSmokes, 23 February 2020 - 11:42 AM.

[Prototelis]

It makes plenty of sense. If it doesn't achieve an average of 800 damage in every match unless you cherry pick the results it does not perform as such.

Build is bad.

[The pessimistic optimist]

Prototelis, on 23 February 2020 - 11:46 AM, said:

It makes plenty of sense. If it doesn't achieve an average of 800 damage in every match unless you cherry pick the results it does not perform as such.

Build is bad.

Ummm you are not think this thought I mostly play quick play because it's pretty much only way to get a match going quickly these days games player base is low. So if you add the randomness of matching making and random teams + 500 on bad matchs + 800 on good match with competent teams. So what you say still makes no sense

[Prototelis]

SirSmokes, on 23 February 2020 - 11:50 AM, said:

Ummm you are not think this thought

Ummm you are not thinking this through. If you don't average 800 damage per match in this mech unless you cherry pick the results it does not achieve an 800 damage per match average.

edit: "3d chess"

Edited by Prototelis, 23 February 2020 - 11:52 AM.

[The pessimistic optimist]

Prototelis, on 23 February 2020 - 11:52 AM, said:

Ummm you are not thinking this through. If you don't average 800 damage per match in this mech unless you cherry pick the results it does not achieve an 800 damage per match average.

edit: "3d chess"

I do 500+ three out maybe ten and seven out of ten 800+ so still not sure what your point was?

Edited by SirSmokes, 23 February 2020 - 11:56 AM.

[FupDup]

SirSmokes, on 23 February 2020 - 11:54 AM, said:

I do 500+ three out maybe ten and seven out of ten 800+

Instead of relying on "maybes" you can go to your profile and check your stats on this mech directly. Take the total damage dealt and divide it by the number of matches played with that chassis and you'll get a more accurate average damage per match statistic.

[The pessimistic optimist]

FupDup, on 23 February 2020 - 11:56 AM, said:

Instead of relying on "maybes" you can go to your profile and check your stats on this mech directly. Take the total damage dealt and divide it by the number of matches played with that chassis and you'll get a more accurate average damage per match statistic.

Most of the time I play mech is after work with a lot whiskey in my system I love to drink and thanks for the tip

Edited by SirSmokes, 23 February 2020 - 11:58 AM.

[Prototelis]

Then that isn't an 800 damage per match average.

I also doubt the first number, your historical averages aren't anywhere close to a 500 damage per match average and I've personally seen you fail to break 1000 damage across four mechs in FP.

Now is the part where you tell me you do it on an alt account and I rightfully accuse you of clubbing seals in the low tiers.

[The pessimistic optimist]

Prototelis, on 23 February 2020 - 11:58 AM, said:

Then that isn't an 800 damage per match average.

I also doubt the first number, your historical averages aren't anywhere close to a 500 damage per match average and I've personally seen you fail to break 1000 damage across four mechs in FP.

Now is the part where you tell me you do it on an alt account and I rightfully accuse you of clubbing seals in the low tiers.

Most likely when I drank few glass of Jameson it's what I do after work mechwarrior and whiskey and why the **** would I want account?

Edited by SirSmokes, 23 February 2020 - 12:01 PM.

[Prototelis]

So now you're only "bad when drunk."

Your build is bad. You'd probably score much higher if you tried to learn a little about why it is bad.

[The pessimistic optimist]

Prototelis, on 23 February 2020 - 12:03 PM, said:

So now you're only "bad when drunk."

Your build is bad. You'd probably score much higher if you tried to learn a little about why it is bad.

I'm not going to lie dude I'm alcoholic and pretend I'm something I'm not and build seems to work fine for me 7 out 10 when all is well

Edited by SirSmokes, 23 February 2020 - 12:13 PM.

[Prototelis]

"I'm only bad on purpose"

Here are some cherry picked statistics that show how gud I am. You believe me right?

Here are a couple of builds I just put together that are a little more optimal and probably more fun.

https://mech.nav-alp...#07286c1b_ON1-P

https://mech.nav-alp...#c16d1a7c_ON1-P