Can we please stop using the arbitrary "not fun" buzzword when trying to justify our inane suggestions? It's not fun.
0
Repetitive Buzzwords Are Not Fun.
Started by feeWAIVER, Apr 25 2021 09:03 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 25 April 2021 - 09:03 PM
#2
Posted 25 April 2021 - 09:29 PM
so is complaining for complaining's sake. especially when the thing being complained about is so vague its imperceptible.
#3
Posted 25 April 2021 - 09:42 PM
Agreed. If people could please quantify how much fun they're having, or not having, would be much more helpful.
Edited by John Bronco, 25 April 2021 - 09:42 PM.
#4
Posted 25 April 2021 - 10:39 PM
I kind of agree with the first guy. What is fun and what isn't is up to the individual. I don't want the Cauldron to use excuses like that for why they do things. They have better reasons for the changes they propose.
#5
Posted 25 April 2021 - 11:57 PM
Don't want someone to shoot down your self admitted dumb ideas? Don't post dumb ideas.
#6
Posted 26 April 2021 - 03:40 AM
It's kinda funny how if you put "not fun" in the forum's search engine, you get threads on the first results page about...
1) complaining about the "forget objectives, just kill them all" attitude in open queue.
2) see 1), about not wanting to play "tryhards" and "meta mechs" .
3) low visibility conditions on maps obstructing their skill.
4) see 2) PPCs
5) see 1), for faction.
6) see 2), regarding stomps.
7) see 4), emphasis on the PPCs.
8) see 2), just in reverse from one of those.
9) skill tree.
10) see 2) ... and 4) i guess, as it complains about high-alpha meta.
I'm kinda seeing a 8-out-of-10 trend there.
1) complaining about the "forget objectives, just kill them all" attitude in open queue.
2) see 1), about not wanting to play "tryhards" and "meta mechs" .
3) low visibility conditions on maps obstructing their skill.
4) see 2) PPCs
5) see 1), for faction.
6) see 2), regarding stomps.
7) see 4), emphasis on the PPCs.
8) see 2), just in reverse from one of those.
9) skill tree.
10) see 2) ... and 4) i guess, as it complains about high-alpha meta.
I'm kinda seeing a 8-out-of-10 trend there.
Edited by katoult, 26 April 2021 - 03:43 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users