Jump to content

Mwo Annual Rewards Program 2025 Updated!


139 replies to this topic

#21 Hawk819

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Colonel
  • Colonel
  • 1,847 posts
  • Location666 Werewolf Lane. Transylvania, Romania Ph#: Transylvania 6-5000

Posted 17 September 2025 - 08:09 AM

As I already said in another post, that Huntsman H better be lore base. In short, every thing should be where its placed: ECM left leg and Active Probe in the right leg, left arm with 3 energy and right arm with 4 energy.

#22 Mayhem Lewis

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • The Divine
  • 67 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 08:14 AM

View PostLordNothing, on 17 September 2025 - 07:34 AM, said:

hoping for apgauss spam.


No.

The game does not need any more ap or mag spam, it's terrible game play, lazy design, and no where near canon.

All AP and Mag should be limited to fire 5 simultaneously at most, their range halved, and zero specific buffs to them for the next year.

The Adder, flea, and other AP & Mag boaters are incredibly bad for game play and the laziest and most self-serving design choice to roll out of the Cauldron's self-dealing corruption show the last two years.

#23 w0qj

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 3,980 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationAt your 6 :)

Posted 17 September 2025 - 08:17 AM

Just curious, should the Prime Award be Heavy/Assault Loyalty Mechs instead?

(Noted that buying vanilla MC would award you with Light/Medium Loyalty Mechs).

On the other hand, you can get two Warthog ADR-W(L) mechs this way! XD
https://mwomercs.com/profile/content

- - - - - - - - - -
2024: I've gotton 2x ADR-W(L) mechs
2025: I can get another 2x ADR-W(L) mechs as per Sept 18th info.
==>That's 4x ADR-W(L) mechs! Posted Image

(Now, if only I can get a full roster of 4x UM-IIC-M(TSP), all four of them! Posted Image )

Edited by w0qj, 17 September 2025 - 08:18 AM.


#24 Mayhem Lewis

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • The Divine
  • 67 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 08:18 AM

View PostHawk819, on 17 September 2025 - 08:09 AM, said:

As I already said in another post, that Huntsman H better be lore base. In short, every thing should be where its placed: ECM left leg and Active Probe in the right leg, left arm with 3 energy and right arm with 4 energy.



Don't count on it. Last year's nova cat had it's ECM removed by the Cauldron and Tiyos, Tiyos' explanation being they worried about giving ECM to a mech with 8 ballistic Hardpoints... which was hilarious because this happened while they were launching an ECM with 10 ballistic hardpoints at the same time, the Bane.

My point being lore, wisdom, balance, none of that matters to PGI's guys or the Cauldron goons who only want to warp the game to their game-play style without any interference, they will rip stuff out and ignore core aspect of a mech to suit their bias or to make sure it doesn't compete with a new mech launch.

Edited by Mayhem Lewis, 17 September 2025 - 08:19 AM.


#25 GreyNovember

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ankle Biter
  • The Ankle Biter
  • 1,544 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 08:49 AM

Aren't you the same guy who wanted to nerf MGs?

Nah screw that, go all in on the theoretical Magshot Munin. You can barely fit em in as is with IS XL, Endo, and Ferro.

#26 Hawk819

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Colonel
  • Colonel
  • 1,847 posts
  • Location666 Werewolf Lane. Transylvania, Romania Ph#: Transylvania 6-5000

Posted 17 September 2025 - 09:29 AM

View PostMayhem Lewis, on 17 September 2025 - 08:18 AM, said:



Don't count on it. Last year's nova cat had it's ECM removed by the Cauldron and Tiyos, Tiyos' explanation being they worried about giving ECM to a mech with 8 ballistic Hardpoints... which was hilarious because this happened while they were launching an ECM with 10 ballistic hardpoints at the same time, the Bane.

My point being lore, wisdom, balance, none of that matters to PGI's guys or the Cauldron goons who only want to warp the game to their game-play style without any interference, they will rip stuff out and ignore core aspect of a mech to suit their bias or to make sure it doesn't compete with a new mech launch.


That's what I'm afraid of.

#27 Steel Raven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,406 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 09:29 AM

View PostPelmeshek, on 17 September 2025 - 06:24 AM, said:

So battlemaster with 4 ballistic in torso, 75t stalker, ecm for huntsman and surprise raven.


Honestly, not a bad lineup for this year. Can think of plenty of builds for a BLR with shoulder mounted ballistics, a 75 tone stalker should slot in nicely with the Marauder and Orion if they don't screw up the survivabilty, more hard points for the Huntsman, I only worry about the Raven MN (Muninn name makes sense) because I struggle with the Huginn.

#28 LordNothing

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 17,856 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 10:50 AM

View PostMayhem Lewis, on 17 September 2025 - 08:14 AM, said:


No.

The game does not need any more ap or mag spam, it's terrible game play, lazy design, and no where near canon.

All AP and Mag should be limited to fire 5 simultaneously at most, their range halved, and zero specific buffs to them for the next year.

The Adder, flea, and other AP & Mag boaters are incredibly bad for game play and the laziest and most self-serving design choice to roll out of the Cauldron's self-dealing corruption show the last two years.


if were being honest, apgauss spam isnt really that much damage. viper is too fragile, adder too slow, piranhas dont have enough ammo. so its not really as strong as it looks on paper.

#29 crazytimes

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,429 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 11:26 AM

I heard rumours that the next legendary will be a rescaled Black Knight? Please confirm.

#30 Steel Raven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,406 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 11:29 AM

I'm more angry that is almost the only brawl friendly mechs we get anymore. SNPPCs are fun, MPL are fun, SRMs are fun, why do we keep getting 8-10 MG mechs? Noble is a fun idea (could use some buffs) the Scale Shot is still fun, more would be appreciated vs 8 mg Urbie and 10 mg Summoner. I like the Crael but this seems to be the default design now post Juggernaut.

#31 BlueDevilspawn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2024 Bronze Champ
  • CS 2024 Bronze Champ
  • 445 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 11:32 AM

This was publicly discussed elsewhere in Discord servers, so I'm relaying it here.

1. Yes, the Huntsman has ECM in the leg as per lore. No this does not mean we're about to get leg weapons. ECM has always been possible. Weapons haven't and won't be.

2. The Raven is based off of the -SS variant (look in Sarna for what it is) that was renamed to the Munin/MN for reasons that should be obvious. Deal with it.

#32 Steel Raven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,406 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 11:34 AM

I actually like the naming convention.

Edited by Steel Raven, 17 September 2025 - 03:35 PM.


#33 Croaker Munin

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • CS 2024 Top 25
  • CS 2024 Top 25
  • 94 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 11:41 AM

View PostBlueDevilspawn, on 17 September 2025 - 11:32 AM, said:



2. The Raven is based off of the -SS variant (look in Sarna for what it is) that was renamed to the Munin/MN for reasons that should be obvious. Deal with it.


So you are telling me I get a Raven with ECM and 6 Laser slots? Hyper Hyper Christmas is earlie this year Posted Image

#34 Ttly

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 422 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 12:00 PM

So what, the Battlemaster is an 85t Sleipnir with higher weapon mounts? Unless it has decent missile/energy quirks, the extra hardpoints are pretty much deadweight/ignored I'd imagine, would've been interesting if they were made more viable so that 3AC5+1LAC2 and whatever missile+energy build on it would be decent instead of just being Sleipnir but higher mount and more agility.

The 75t Stalker being decent depends on how much quirk it gets for losing the tonnage (and a missile hardpoint) I guess. I'd imagine it gets at least some heat quirk.

And the PPC+LRM TBR I doubt will actually be used that way over the usual ECM mixpod builds too, also would need as much So8 quirks as the TBR-Prime (which also can already run its loadout albeit with slightly different[worse] weapon placement) to at least be decent.

The ECM Huntsman is eh, kind of whatever that will just be run with 2HLL+a bunch of ERMLs or whatever like PPC poptart. Nothing really new.

View PostCroaker Munin, on 17 September 2025 - 11:41 AM, said:

So you are telling me I get a Raven with ECM and 6 Laser slots? Hyper Hyper Christmas is earlie this year Posted Image



Weird way to spell out, "I'm okay with older stuff like Wolfhound-Grinner (that is already rarely ever seen) getting powercreeped!Posted Image"

Edited by Ttly, 17 September 2025 - 12:33 PM.


#35 Hawk819

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Colonel
  • Colonel
  • 1,847 posts
  • Location666 Werewolf Lane. Transylvania, Romania Ph#: Transylvania 6-5000

Posted 17 September 2025 - 12:55 PM

View PostBlueDevilspawn, on 17 September 2025 - 11:32 AM, said:

This was publicly discussed elsewhere in Discord servers, so I'm relaying it here.

1. Yes, the Huntsman has ECM in the leg as per lore. No this does not mean we're about to get leg weapons. ECM has always been possible. Weapons haven't and won't be.

2. The Raven is based off of the -SS variant (look in Sarna for what it is) that was renamed to the Munin/MN for reasons that should be obvious. Deal with it.


Yes. So everything is where it's suppose to be?

Edited by Hawk819, 17 September 2025 - 12:56 PM.


#36 BlueDevilspawn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2024 Bronze Champ
  • CS 2024 Bronze Champ
  • 445 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 03:10 PM

Should be

#37 Steel Raven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,406 posts

Posted 17 September 2025 - 03:25 PM

View PostTtly, on 17 September 2025 - 12:00 PM, said:


Weird way to spell out, "I'm okay with older stuff like Wolfhound-Grinner (that is already rarely ever seen) getting powercreeped!Posted Image"


It's still a Raven with Raven hit boxes and armor. It's not a Grinner but it is a better Raven.

#38 Hawk819

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Colonel
  • Colonel
  • 1,847 posts
  • Location666 Werewolf Lane. Transylvania, Romania Ph#: Transylvania 6-5000

Posted 17 September 2025 - 04:21 PM

View PostBlueDevilspawn, on 17 September 2025 - 03:10 PM, said:

Should be


Good!

#39 TercieI

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 8,186 posts
  • LocationThe Far Country

Posted 17 September 2025 - 05:31 PM

View PostBlueDevilspawn, on 17 September 2025 - 11:32 AM, said:

2. The Raven is based off of the -SS variant (look in Sarna for what it is) that was renamed to the Munin/MN for reasons that should be obvious. Deal with it.


LOL. They didn't change "Grand Dragon." Glad they figured this out.

#40 TTB

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 65 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationGermany

Posted 17 September 2025 - 06:14 PM

I read Battlemaster. I am happy.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users