I'd be interested to see how that would work, as I'm sure it's been thought of.
Seabear, on 22 March 2012 - 01:41 PM, said:
This is not "either/or" but rather more of "all of the above". There is not one energy souce that will answer all the worlds needs nor work in the many varied locations in the world. Besides, do we really want to give another group the strangle hold over energy production that the oil companies now have? Options and choice will make things cheaper and more user friendly.
If practical nuclear fusion ever really becomes a reality, there won't need to be another option, frankly (though developing certain clean alternatives is still crucial right now to avoid the "all eggs on one basket" issue). Having fusion would be such a leap in technology, that wanting anything else would be like having a computer and demanding the option for an abacus
Edited by Catamount, 22 March 2012 - 03:36 PM.