Jump to content

How Do We Find New Posts/ Unread Posts?


5 replies to this topic

#1 Wildedge

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 44 posts

Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:09 AM

I'm looking for the button.. (that I see on most other forums) to read only new or unread threads. Will someone please tell me where I'm over looking this function?

#2 Chuckie

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 1,739 posts
  • LocationHell if I don't change my ways

Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:10 AM

View PostWildedge, on 06 November 2012 - 11:09 AM, said:

I'm looking for the button.. (that I see on most other forums) to read only new or unread threads. Will someone please tell me where I'm over looking this function?


I second..

#3 zer0imh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 581 posts
  • LocationFomalhaut

Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:17 AM

been saying this since day 1. i think they want us to suffer.

same is true with the mechlab. maybe the designer of this forum is the same guy who designed the mechlab.

Edited by zer0imh, 06 November 2012 - 11:19 AM.


#4 Listless Nomad

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Brother
  • Big Brother
  • 1,573 posts
  • LocationElsewhere

Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:40 AM

There used to be a new threads area, before they turned the forum into this...abomination.

Hopefully it will come back soon - made looking out for new dev threads a heck of a lot easier.

#5 Wildedge

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 44 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 10:39 AM

I really can't believe this. If you guys are right and the option isn't even available, it's an incredible lack of functionality for this forum.

Hello developers/forum owner?

#6 WarPickle

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 513 posts
  • LocationAt my computer

Posted 07 November 2012 - 05:12 PM

I can't believe they even started using this new site without having normal functionality. Shoulda kept the old format, it worked :rolleyes:





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users