Is The "pretty Baby" Hero Awesome On Anyone Else's Shopping List?
#41
Posted 29 January 2013 - 12:47 PM
#42
Posted 29 January 2013 - 12:49 PM
#43
Posted 29 January 2013 - 12:52 PM
#44
Posted 29 January 2013 - 12:57 PM
how does any of this correlate!?!? It's like a you pulled 3 ideas out of a hat and slapped them together. It looks really fkn bad.
You have Hundreds of lore paint jobs to pull from (inner sphere house units, merc units, etc) - what makes you come up with a compilation like this? It looks 130% awful.
edit: and ... nice unskinned lego block on his left arm.. props.
Edited by Liquidx, 29 January 2013 - 01:05 PM.
#45
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:01 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 29 January 2013 - 11:40 AM, said:
What's more is the varied harpoints look likely to allow for some nice load outs.
Add to that is that "Pretty Baby" is another canon hero mech, taken from the 3025 TRO, much like the Death's Knell, which makes me happy as a fluff guy (and for those who don't care about canon.. it's all good, I don't care about your onion, either! ).
So, anyone else gonna pony up for the pretty baby?
And with the head hit boxes seeming to shrink every patch, I feel less and less worry about their "easy" kill factor. Plus, current net code means I ain't worried about those pesky lights anymore!
Despite all the broad consensus that the Awesome is the worst mech out there - it is still one of my favorites.
I use them all (besides the 8Q - I seem unable to find a build that works for me)
So unless the hardpoints are complete crap I am going to get one for sure!!!
Anyone knows anything about the HP?
#46
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:06 PM
I think the Death's Knell is way too expensive.... do you think I'm going to pay $50 for an Awesome?!?
Ridiculous... absolutely ridiculous.
First step, IGP..... cut all the prices to a quarter of what you are currently charging, especially for the Hero Mechs.
Then, let me play this game offline as long as I want (MP and with freakin' bots if needed) and let me keep all these digital toys so that when your servers go down I still have something to show for my money.
Then we'll talk.
#47
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:08 PM
Liquidx, on 29 January 2013 - 12:57 PM, said:
how does any of this correlate!?!? It's like a you pulled 3 ideas out of a hat and slapped them together. It looks ******* awful.
You have Hundreds of lore paint jobs to pull from (inner sphere house units, merc units, etc) - what makes you come up with a compilation like this? It looks 130% awful.
edit: and ... nice unskinned lego block on his left arm.. props.
Chisholm's Has no Uniform paint scheme. The Mech is called "Pretty Baby" Nothing said it wasn't sarcastic. Just saying these are legitimate explanations for what you are now complaining about. It is a Historic Heroes Mech and with the exception of it not (presently) having the Chisholm's emblem does not violate any part of Canon.
#48
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:10 PM
#49
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:10 PM
M A L I C E, on 29 January 2013 - 11:53 AM, said:
The paint is growing on me a little bit I guess.
I'm just disappointed it wasn't the AWS-9Ma.
A fast ECM Awesome would have been just what the Assault class needs to balance out the insane firepower of the Stalker and the God like tanking of the Atlases.
.
So Garth saying the "Awesome" was getting some love is the reason I was told I would have to wait 2 weeks for a duel against an "Awesome 9m" a couple of days ago..?? Was it because there would be a buff that "Someone " was waiting for..?? Please tell me it wasn't this... LOL
Edited by Odins Fist, 29 January 2013 - 01:10 PM.
#50
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:10 PM
4,500 - Flame or Fang
5,250 - Ilya Muromets
2,500 - for a Hero assault mech? keep dreaming, Maybe if its on sale
Edited by Riddler9884, 29 January 2013 - 01:10 PM.
#51
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:12 PM
#53
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:20 PM
M A L I C E, on 29 January 2013 - 01:14 PM, said:
Haha,
Well, while I was 98% certain we had a Hero AWS on the way, and I really did believe it was going to be the 9Ma, I truly was out of bays to rebuy the 9M to duel with you. However, now that I'm going to be rebuying a particular flaming variant of the AWS ANYWAY, might as well use it for our duel, no?
.
I'm thinking of selling "MY" 9M to make a spot for this "Pretty Baby"... Or maybe a New Mech Slot, I haven't decided.
.
I was almost positive that it was waiting for the "LOVE" Garth said the Awesome would get as the reason for the 2 week delay, but I didn't think Garth meant the "Pretty Baby" was the love... Take your time, i'm not going anywhere that I know of yet.
#54
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:23 PM
#55
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:24 PM
#56
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:25 PM
If so, that would indicate that the AWS-PB comes with a 340-rated engine stock, and can fit up to an XL400 to move at 89kph.
A speedster of the 9M variety with useful SRM racks could make for an interesting Mech.
Edited by Vlad Ward, 29 January 2013 - 01:26 PM.
#57
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:39 PM
Combined with the fact that it's an Awesome, definitely a no buy from me. Pity too, I enjoy buying Hero mechs.
#58
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:47 PM
#59
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:52 PM
2E RA (PPC on stock)
2M RT (LRM15 on stock)
1M LA (SRM4 on stock)
2E LA (LLS on stock)
1E H (MLS on stock)
For a total of 61 firepower and a sustained DPS of atleast 7.5+ given the large heat efficiency. An XL340 should power it with atleast 20 DHS and 360LRM's and 100 SRM's.
Cost around 6k MC, so $27 or like £20 (for me)
And with that shocking paint scheme would you buy one? ... I wouldn't !
Edited by WhupAzz, 29 January 2013 - 01:56 PM.
#60
Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:57 PM
WhupAzz, on 29 January 2013 - 01:52 PM, said:
2E RA (PPC on stock)
2M RT (LRM15 on stock)
1M LA (SRM4 on stock)
2E LA (LLS on stock)
1E H (MLS on stock)
For a total of 61 firepower and a sustained DPS of atleast 7.5+ given the large heat efficiency. An XL340 should power it with atleast 20 DHS and 360LRM's and 100 SRM's.
Cost around 6k MC, so $27 or like £20 (for me)
And with that shocking paint scheme would you buy one? ... I wouldn't !
sounds about right
basically a superior 9M in every way (potentially faster, doesn't have a ridiculous 4 hardpoints in the CT)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users