Jump to content

Prediction


7 replies to this topic

#1 PanzerMagier

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 1,369 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationSome nameless backwater planet

Posted 15 January 2014 - 03:23 AM

There is not 1 heavy that has a loadout of:
3 missile slots
1 ballistic slot
Jumpjets

PREDICTION: The hero quickdraw will have a ballistic slot.

@PGI
Here's an open wager PGI. Take me on my bet if you dare, chicken freebirths. :ph34r:
I wager if the quickdraw hero has a ballistic. You owe me that hero mech. If it doesn't, I'll buy MC twice it's price.
You can put me on negative MC so that I'm forced to pay it. Sounds fair? Sounds fair to me.

Edited by PanzerMagier, 16 January 2014 - 11:00 AM.


#2 LiGhtningFF13

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Devoted
  • The Devoted
  • 1,375 posts
  • LocationBetween the Flannagan's Nebulea and the Pleiades Cluster

Posted 15 January 2014 - 03:34 AM

Nice idea, would be an interesting weapon combination including the speed.

#3 627

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wrath
  • Wrath
  • 4,571 posts

Posted 15 January 2014 - 06:41 AM

The what? You'll see a hero trebuchet before a quicklegged one... quickies are a rare sight nowadays...

#4 SuperBroHeroFella

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Wrench
  • 124 posts

Posted 15 January 2014 - 07:57 AM

Who drives a Quickdraw anyways.

#5 Amsro

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 3,443 posts
  • LocationCharging my Gauss Rifle

Posted 15 January 2014 - 08:17 AM

View PostPilot of the {LT-MOB-25} Pit, on 15 January 2014 - 07:57 AM, said:

Who drives a Quickdraw anyways.


*Raises Hand* I do! :ph34r:

#6 PanzerMagier

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 1,369 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationSome nameless backwater planet

Posted 16 January 2014 - 01:11 AM

I did, and even though I said I'll never support PGI until XYZ. I'd actually consider breaking that rule and buying a hero mech that is:

A Heavy
3 missile points
1 Ballistic points
Jumpjets.

It's most likely going to be QKD because it just needs a ballistic point in the arm/torso w/e

#7 627

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wrath
  • Wrath
  • 4,571 posts

Posted 16 January 2014 - 01:17 AM

View PostPanzerMagier, on 16 January 2014 - 01:11 AM, said:

I did, and even though I said I'll never support PGI until XYZ. I'd actually consider breaking that rule and buying a hero mech that is:

A Heavy
3 missile points
1 Ballistic points
Jumpjets.

It's most likely going to be QKD because it just needs a ballistic point in the arm/torso w/e


I'm curious, for what? What build do you have in mind?

#8 PanzerMagier

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 1,369 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationSome nameless backwater planet

Posted 16 January 2014 - 10:49 AM

View Post627, on 16 January 2014 - 01:17 AM, said:

I'm curious, for what? What build do you have in mind?


If it comes out, I'll give you my full guide, Right now I have a prototype running on my Wolverine. But it needs a few more tonnes to be a ironed out. Right now my 55 tonner wolfie is always sucking hard on something with the loadout, either ammo, engine size or armour. Or even a mixture of all 3. I'm confidant I can iron out all 3 of those if I can get a heavy. Especially in a quackdraw. Edit: Rest assured 627 I would not be asking for a mech of this loadout if I didn't do over a 1000 damage/ got over 6 kills in my prototype. Which I did, so I want to see what happens when I get a mech that can actually mount the weapons I require without having some major drawbacks.

also I like how this got moved from the barracks to "upcoming features". I reckon it would have sifted to "suggested features" does that imply something or are the mods just trolling me. ^.^

Edited by PanzerMagier, 16 January 2014 - 10:51 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users