The Eternal Quest For More Dakka Dakka
#1
Posted 31 January 2014 - 01:58 PM
How do I have fun? By making as insane a build as possible and going into matches with it. LRM100 Artemis Stalker? Yes. 6 AC/2 or 4 UAC/5 Jaeger? Yes. 7 PPC Battlemaster? Yes. 2 AC20 Cicada? Absolutely. Yes I know, many people in this community think that's atrocious. Not only have I been hated on and ridiculed for it, but even on multiple occasions been team killed for my trouble by people who refuse to let me play "such a ****ing stupid build" to use their words.
That being said, despite the community's large number of bad apples and their attitude problems in game, I know there's plenty of people here who are still cool. So I turn to you now and ask...
What other completely insane builds can you suggest for me to try in my eternal quest for more dakka dakka? I'm especially partial to ballistics, but any build that would get at best a: "You're insane" response from most people will do.
#2
Posted 31 January 2014 - 02:10 PM
#3
Posted 31 January 2014 - 02:11 PM
#4
Posted 31 January 2014 - 09:33 PM
Are there any assaults with ballistic hardpoints in both side torsos and arms (with enough slots for a Gauss)?
<edit> Just looked through Smurfy's. Unfortunately the answer is no. QQ </edit>
Edited by Akerlof, 31 January 2014 - 09:38 PM.
#5
Posted 31 January 2014 - 09:42 PM
#6
Posted 31 January 2014 - 10:28 PM
Actually, I have a question. Have you Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?
Edited by LuInRei, 31 January 2014 - 10:29 PM.
#7
Posted 31 January 2014 - 10:42 PM
before the ghost we could use those insain builds.
Edited by Turist0AT, 31 January 2014 - 11:00 PM.
#8
Posted 31 January 2014 - 10:47 PM
#9
Posted 31 January 2014 - 10:59 PM
#10
Posted 01 February 2014 - 12:15 AM
#11
Posted 01 February 2014 - 07:46 AM
Modo44, on 01 February 2014 - 12:15 AM, said:
Holy Mother of God!
I'd wet my pants if that came over the ridge behind me!
I hate you.
Lol.
Now I'm thinking maybe I will try Jager's someday?
Of course, if anyone SEES you, you're toast, but....
#13
Posted 01 February 2014 - 08:35 AM
Stuart Orland, on 31 January 2014 - 01:58 PM, said:
Vids listed with lowest number being most recent.
Flamer Stalker. 1 2 3 <--truthfully viable.
ROFLWalker. 1 LRM 75 and LRM-100 Stalkers. <--viable under conditions.
ROFLPult. How to make it. 1 2 <--genuine challenge build. Made to build up your skills in strategic placement.
Flamer Awesomes - split screen and picture in picture.
#14
#15
Posted 01 February 2014 - 11:53 AM
Modo44, on 01 February 2014 - 12:15 AM, said:
I find a certain irony in this. That's...stock armor for a Jager S. It really is. That's what a jager's armor is supposed to be. o.o
#16
Posted 01 February 2014 - 11:59 AM
Koniving, on 01 February 2014 - 11:53 AM, said:
I find a certain irony in this. That's...stock armor for a Jager S. It really is. That's what a jager's armor is supposed to be. o.o
Which is about right...just like the Mech Who Must Not Be Named which inspired the Jager in the first place. Massive firepower but no stamina.
#17
Posted 01 February 2014 - 05:43 PM
#18
Posted 01 February 2014 - 05:48 PM
Small problem with it though, currently it requires the cash-only Muromets.
#19
Posted 01 February 2014 - 06:08 PM
I feel you pain in the pursuit of fun.
I run a spider with two ERPPC, and I love it, but some folks just cant let you alone, especially after they die and are riding shotgun in the mech with.
Seriously team-kills are bad enough, but it blew my mind when one of my dead teamates started giving my position away in chat just because my build was "stupid" and "noobish" and "pointless".
I love this game, but man sometimes I wish I could kick some know it alls in the balls.
2xERPPC, with ECM, jumps, and top speed of 97k super super fun
#20
Posted 01 February 2014 - 08:00 PM
I tend to prefer 2 ER PPCs on a 35 tonner like the Raven or Jenner. That's a difficult order to use on a Spider.
But if your accuracy is anything like mine before the lag compensation craziness... Then who cares what they say?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users