Jump to content

Jenner K Only 2 Modules Slots?


8 replies to this topic

#1 Monkey Lover

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 7,918 posts
  • LocationWazan

Posted 10 August 2014 - 10:41 PM

OK I can see the jenner D having only 2 mech module slots but why does the jenner K only have 2? It has one less missile hardpoint.

Edited by Monkey Lover, 10 August 2014 - 10:41 PM.


#2 Davers

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,886 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationCanada

Posted 10 August 2014 - 10:45 PM

I assume it is an oversight. Hopefully it gets fixed.

#3 John1352

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,025 posts
  • LocationConnecting....

Posted 10 August 2014 - 10:51 PM

Welcome to the Stalker 4N club little Jenner, I hope you enjoy your indefinite stay.

#4 Sandslice

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 625 posts

Posted 11 August 2014 - 12:19 AM

View PostJohn1352, on 10 August 2014 - 10:51 PM, said:

Welcome to the Stalker 4N club little Jenner, I hope you enjoy your indefinite stay.

Stalkers are a mess in general. The 3H has the same problem (dropped hardpoints,) while the 5S has the opposite (same as the 3F, plus an extra AMS) - and they all had base-1 for modules.

The Jenners had been internally balanced through old-style modules, which was disrupted - and is arguably an easier fix than that. B)

#5 Brizna

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 1,367 posts
  • LocationCatalonia

Posted 11 August 2014 - 03:40 AM

Yes, something need to be done about Jenner K.

People bought it exactly because it had more module slots than the other jenners and it should still have more regardless of the module system.

#6 Monkey Lover

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 7,918 posts
  • LocationWazan

Posted 11 August 2014 - 03:48 AM

View PostBrizna, on 11 August 2014 - 03:40 AM, said:

Yes, something need to be done about Jenner K.

People bought it exactly because it had more module slots than the other jenners and it should still have more regardless of the module system.


I just rebought one because smurfy said it has 3 :)

#7 TercieI

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 8,183 posts
  • LocationThe Far Country

Posted 11 August 2014 - 05:02 AM

Like much of what PGI does (looks at new spawns, weapon modules, etc.), the basic idea wasn't bad, but the execution was baffling.

#8 Brizna

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 1,367 posts
  • LocationCatalonia

Posted 11 August 2014 - 05:46 AM

Yes I know Jenner K isn't the only mech that's been rendered a metallic pile of junk, but it's one of the few who have objectively (without posibility of counter argument) been rendered so. They need a FIX, even if it's in the form of another useless weapon module slot, at least then people will be able to actually argue that it is ballanced with some degree of credibility. But to be honest if they gave JN7-K 2 general modules base the mech would be just fine. Surely people wouldn't flock to JN7-K leaving their timberwolves and daishies at home and picking a D or K would actually involve chosing something over something else, not just geting the ugliest girl.

#9 MechWarrior849305

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,024 posts

Posted 11 August 2014 - 06:02 AM

Yet Oxide got 3 :) Not to mention, that I fought 1k battles in JR7-K just because it(she?) had more than average module slots

Edited by DuoAngel, 11 August 2014 - 06:03 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users