Man I'm So Sick Of This Nerf Clan Crap
#21
Posted 29 August 2014 - 11:35 PM
#22
Posted 29 August 2014 - 11:36 PM
kilgor, on 29 August 2014 - 11:13 PM, said:
A common misconception. The Jade Falcons were really the only ones that idolized the glory of 1v1 combat. Us in Clan Wolf are here to get the mission done, but will honor your request for Zellbrigen if asked.
#23
Posted 29 August 2014 - 11:37 PM
mongo2006, on 29 August 2014 - 11:32 PM, said:
See we have common ground FatYak so lets work on that. If the two branches are unbalanced then yes make them balanced but Clan mechs have been nerfed to the point that some of the mech variants are going to have a hard time with even the build they came with, designed to have, so go the other way and buff IS and see how that goes before they unbalance Clan mechs.
A lot of the IS mechs are right now obsolete and why would anyone in their right mind take them into a CW match. A system of balance needs to be put into place, I do agree upon that. But PGI will make makes worthless, at least for CW, that is just going to be the nature of this game.
#24
Posted 29 August 2014 - 11:40 PM
Increasing IS im ok with but then you get power creep.
Edited by Ace Selin, 29 August 2014 - 11:42 PM.
#25
Posted 29 August 2014 - 11:40 PM
Edited by Mister D, 30 August 2014 - 12:18 AM.
#26
Posted 29 August 2014 - 11:41 PM
#27
Posted 29 August 2014 - 11:42 PM
#28
Posted 29 August 2014 - 11:46 PM
Aresye, on 29 August 2014 - 11:36 PM, said:
Sorry, but you are misinformed on that.
There are different interpretations of cellbriggen, you are right on this one, but they all come down to honorfull combat one against one and that the better skilled warrior will win. Cellbriggen is only disregarded if the opponent is breaking it by showing dishonorable combat. Many vs many battle reduces the honor a clan pilot can gain in battle as he can no longer claim a victory by himself.
In 3049 none of the clans knew how the IS would fight. They would all follow cellbriggen at the beginning of a fight and only use concentrated fire, if forced to do so by opponents with no honor. It took the clans a while to adapt to the tactics of the inner sphere and to engage them with more forces or with no cellbriggen rules. But at this point in time, you all should honor one on one duells and at least start the engagement with that in mind!
But... as the clanmechs are not supposed to be stronger in MWO, just different, I don't blame you for ignoring cellbriggen.
#29
Posted 29 August 2014 - 11:52 PM
#31
Posted 29 August 2014 - 11:57 PM
#32
Posted 30 August 2014 - 12:00 AM
#33
Posted 30 August 2014 - 12:02 AM
So they seem to have tossed out lore and went to the numerical form of balancing and as you can see it still ain't right.
#34
Posted 30 August 2014 - 12:08 AM
#35
Posted 30 August 2014 - 12:14 AM
#36
Posted 30 August 2014 - 12:15 AM
Balancing it out is fine but I'd wait to see how that works before nerfing the actual mechs. You might think they'd just take less lights but it should be dropping a heavy or assault from the clan teams. If you are going to make clan and IS mechs equivalent to balance them against each other then you also need to allow clan mechs the same level of customisation.
You also can't base this on the lore due to the customisation we've been allowed. Some IS builds can beat clan mechs one on one, even being a lighter mech than the clans mech. Lore describes pretty much stock IS mechs with standard pilots facing superior tech and pilots in the clans.
#37
Posted 30 August 2014 - 12:18 AM
#38
Posted 30 August 2014 - 12:18 AM
#39
Posted 30 August 2014 - 12:19 AM
Damien Tokala, on 30 August 2014 - 12:08 AM, said:
Bro I don't thinki most IS players have the stomach for "devastation" lol, not even sure if I would for that matter, we all just want a good fight. I dont mind being outnumbered, don't mind equally capable mechs, because at the end of the day I'll say we where out numbered, by capable mechs and we still kicked their asses.. I want that..
#40
Posted 30 August 2014 - 12:21 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users